Thanks for the feedback. As I haven't heard any objections, I'll open a
JIRA issue and a PR to remove the vendor specific repositories.
Cheers,
Till
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 12:28 PM Aljoscha Krettek
wrote:
> +1 to remove
>
> > On 20. Dec 2019, at 10:34, Robert Metzger wrote:
> >
> > Okay, I und
+1 to remove
> On 20. Dec 2019, at 10:34, Robert Metzger wrote:
>
> Okay, I understand. I'm okay with removing the profile.
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 11:34 AM Till Rohrmann wrote:
>
>> The profiles make bumping ZooKeeper's version a bit more cumbersome. I
>> would be interested for this rea
Okay, I understand. I'm okay with removing the profile.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 11:34 AM Till Rohrmann wrote:
> The profiles make bumping ZooKeeper's version a bit more cumbersome. I
> would be interested for this reason to get rid of them, too.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 5:3
The profiles make bumping ZooKeeper's version a bit more cumbersome. I
would be interested for this reason to get rid of them, too.
Cheers,
Till
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 5:35 PM Robert Metzger wrote:
> I guess we are talking about this profile [1] in the pom.xml?
>
> +1 to remove.
>
> I'm not su
I guess we are talking about this profile [1] in the pom.xml?
+1 to remove.
I'm not sure if we need to rush this for the 1.10 release. The profile is
not doing us any harm at the moment.
[1]https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/pom.xml#L1035
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 4:51 PM Till Rohrmann
Hi everyone,
following the discussion started by Seth [1] I would like to discuss
dropping the vendor specific repositories from Flink's parent pom.xml. As
building Flink against a vendor specific Hadoop version is no longer needed
(as it simply needs to be added to the classpath) and documented,
