Okay, I understand. I'm okay with removing the profile. On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 11:34 AM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote:
> The profiles make bumping ZooKeeper's version a bit more cumbersome. I > would be interested for this reason to get rid of them, too. > > Cheers, > Till > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 5:35 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> I guess we are talking about this profile [1] in the pom.xml? >> >> +1 to remove. >> >> I'm not sure if we need to rush this for the 1.10 release. The profile is >> not doing us any harm at the moment. >> >> [1]https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/pom.xml#L1035 >> >> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 4:51 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> following the discussion started by Seth [1] I would like to discuss >>> dropping the vendor specific repositories from Flink's parent pom.xml. As >>> building Flink against a vendor specific Hadoop version is no longer >>> needed >>> (as it simply needs to be added to the classpath) and documented, I >>> believe >>> that the vendor specific repositories and the mapr profile have become >>> obsolete. Moreover, users can still use vendor specific Hadoop versions >>> if >>> they configure their local maven to point to the respective repository >>> [2]. >>> Flink's sources would simply no longer be shipped with this option. >>> >>> Are there any concerns about dropping the vendor specific repositories >>> from >>> pom.xml? I would like to make this change for the upcoming Flink 1.10 >>> release if possible. >>> >>> [1] >>> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/83afcf6c0d5d7a0a7179cbdac9593ebe7478b0dc548781bf9915a006%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E >>> [2] >>> https://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-multiple-repositories.html >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Till >>> >>
