x27;t do it as Alexander explained me IIRC.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 23:13
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: License Stuff
I was just wondering if FM was dealing with such a situation :)
--
and somehow handle that ... so if it's the
problem "all or nothing" then we could handle this.
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 22:56
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: RE: Li
g, 29. Oktober 2013 22:56
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: RE: License Stuff
> The FP SDK is just playerglobal.swc. It is a single file so if there
> was
a pom.xml next to it, would that be sufficient?
Thanks for make me recall again :-) yes, you're right it could be enough.
> AI
1]
>
>-Fred
>
>[1]
>http://apacheflexvm.cloudapp.net/artifactory/simple/ext-release-local/com/
>ad
>obe/air/
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:46
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : Re: License
Should a pom file
associated with this zip file be sufficient?
Om
> -Fred
>
> [1]
>
> http://apacheflexvm.cloudapp.net/artifactory/simple/ext-release-local/com/ad
> obe/air/
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Envoyé :
: mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:46
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: License Stuff
Like I said, I don't know much about Maven.
IIRC, there was some thinking that, because the FP and AIR SDKs are the
"leaf" of a dependency tree, there wasn't much more than a pom.xml needed.
I beli
the feasibility I still have.
>
>Thanks,
>-Fred
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
>Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:37
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : RE: License Stuff
>
>I can't see how 1 or more pom.x
have.
Thanks,
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:37
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: License Stuff
I can't see how 1 or more pom.xml on their server could help Alex, we need
artifacts and classifiers
artifacts and classifiers along with the project descriptor, I mean trees
>entire mavenized SDKs. did I miss or forgot something again :-) ?
>
>-Fred
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:32
>À : dev@fl
@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:32
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: License Stuff
Adobe did not want to deal with registration or a way to avoid the license
dialog, but I'm pretty sure we got permission to put up pom.xml files on the
current downloads server.
On 10/29/13 2:2
just for that.
>
>-Fred
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:20
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : Re: License Stuff
>
>
>
>On 10/29/13 2:14 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
I meant, invest any resources even IIRC
-Message d'origine-
De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:29
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: License Stuff
IIRC Adobe didn't want to invest in a server just for that.
-Fred
--
IIRC Adobe didn't want to invest in a server just for that.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:20
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: License Stuff
On 10/29/13 2:14 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
&
available at the Sonatype OSS repo and after some time
artifacts are synced to Mavan Central.
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 21:31
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: RE: License Stuff
Chris, I jus
On 10/29/13 2:14 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>Also, I can retrieve it at the moment but when I read the specific Air
>license terms, I understood it couldn't be distributed in piece but only
>in
>only one full and original distribution.
Yes, that's probably true, and the runtimes are part of t
:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:02
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: License Stuff
I hadn't noticed that "intranet" restriction before. I would contact Adobe
via the link where it says: "contact an Adobe Mobile & Devices
representative".
Mak
hy I had liked a pointer on a such
>license agreement used by Sonatype and how to get it.
>
>Thanks,
>-Fred
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 21:35
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : Re: License
yé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 21:35
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: License Stuff
On 10/29/13 1:23 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>Thanks for reminding me, it was completely out of my head.
>
>> I may still set up a simple "business" to distribute the same packa
On 10/29/13 1:23 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>Thanks for reminding me, it was completely out of my head.
>
>> I may still set up a simple "business" to distribute the same package as
>Adobe 4.6 but a license acceptance will still be required which AFAIK
>still
>poses a problem for Maven.
>
>Th
n: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 21:08
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: License Stuff
We did not pursue that approach because Apache supposedly only distributes
source code with open licenses. Even if there was such an agreement, the
binary packages stil
nteractive process.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 21:08
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: License Stuff
We did not pursue that approach because Apache supposedly only distributes
source code with open licenses. Even if t
>Not sure if it has been already asked but can't Apache / Apache Flex
>sign a
>Distribution agreement ?
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 17:57
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : Re: Lic
Not sure if it has been already asked but can't Apache / Apache Flex sign a
Distribution agreement ?
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 17:57
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: License Stuff
On 10/29/
On 10/29/13 7:16 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
wrote:
>Hi Guys,
>
>I am currently talking to Brian Fox from Sonatype. He told me that
>Sonatype signed a Distribution Agreement with Adobe had been signed in
>2008, but this has expired 2009, but it seems they are willing to re-sign
>such an Agr
QUITE A LOT :)
As soon as possible!
Good work Chris!
Miguel
> From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:16:16 +0100
> Subject: License Stuff
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I am currently talking to Brian Fox from Sonatype. He told me that Sonatype
> signed a Di
25 matches
Mail list logo
