I can't see how 1 or more pom.xml on their server could help Alex, we need artifacts and classifiers along with the project descriptor, I mean trees entire mavenized SDKs. did I miss or forgot something again :-) ?
-Fred -----Message d'origine----- De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:32 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: License Stuff Adobe did not want to deal with registration or a way to avoid the license dialog, but I'm pretty sure we got permission to put up pom.xml files on the current downloads server. On 10/29/13 2:29 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: >IIRC Adobe didn't want to invest in a server just for that. > >-Fred > >-----Message d'origine----- >De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre >2013 22:20 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: License Stuff > > > >On 10/29/13 2:14 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>Also, I can retrieve it at the moment but when I read the specific Air >>license terms, I understood it couldn't be distributed in piece but >>only in only one full and original distribution. >Yes, that's probably true, and the runtimes are part of the SDK. I >don't think they make a distribution without the runtimes. > >Just to be sure, we once talked about Adobe putting pom.xml files on >its downloads server. Have we decided that is insufficient and a >distribution agreement is better? Either way, there is some sort of a >license acceptance requirement unless we can get an exemption. > >-Alex >
