> Looks like it is pretty easy to get a license. Just ask here [1] I meant in order to publicly distribute adobe artifacts, not only in a closed intranet environment as mentioned, I read that document last night and others too, I haven't see any talking about an agreement to allow public distribution of Air / FP, from the ones I read, only Adobe was allowed to distribute them publicly, the reason why I had liked a pointer on a such license agreement used by Sonatype and how to get it.
Thanks, -Fred -----Message d'origine----- De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 21:35 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: License Stuff On 10/29/13 1:23 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: >Thanks for reminding me, it was completely out of my head. > >> I may still set up a simple "business" to distribute the same package >> as >Adobe 4.6 but a license acceptance will still be required which AFAIK >still poses a problem for Maven. > >The acceptance can be done thru the installer which in return gives a >credential to a Maven repo we could manage, maybe my limited company >could manage to ask an Adobe Distribution License, what's the requirements ? Looks like it is pretty easy to get a license. Just ask here [1] > >> Maybe we should add some license handling to Maven itself? > >I don't think it is possible to have an interactive process. If Ant can ask a question, Maven should be able to as well. And if there is a server involved, it should be able to handle registration so you can skip the interactive dialogs. But that's just my opinion... > >-Fred [1] http://www.adobe.com/products/players/flash-player-distribution.html
