On 7/2/16, 10:34 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> IMO, because the patch files are generated from ant scripts, they don't
>> need headers.
>
>IMO if it source code it need a header, otherwise how do we know how the
>patch is licensed or where it come from?
>
>This same issue was also brough
Hi,
> IMO, because the patch files are generated from ant scripts, they don't
> need headers.
IMO if it source code it need a header, otherwise how do we know how the patch
is licensed or where it come from?
This same issue was also brought up on an incubating release recently. [1]
Thanks,
Jus
IMO, because the patch files are generated from ant scripts, they don't
need headers. And because the patches ares a modification to CreateJS, it
is ASF content, not CreateJS content, so I didn't mention CreateJS in the
LICENSE since none of their IP is bundled. In the binary package,
CreateJS is
Hi,
I took a quick look at the source releases:
For Falcon:
- The LICENSE file is missing MIT licensed creatjs / easeljs / tweenjs [1][2]
- I’m not sure how some files have this (e.g. [X]) is "Copyright 2001-2005 The
Apache Software Foundation”. The dates are odd and it’s unusual for a source
HI Alex,
I'm on mac. I'll try later today to install latest maven and report what
happen, in the mean while, I'll share the error of the last report (I
forgot to post it in all):
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] Apache Flex - FlexJS .. SUCCESS [1.925s]
[INFO] A
On 6/30/16, 1:12 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>So, I only run the first line for falcon, and I need to run other two ok?
Yes you need to run all 3.
>
>Should I try with at least 3.3.1?
I'm using 3.2.3 on Mac. Are you on Mac or Win?
-Alex
Datum: 30.06.16 20:08 (GMT+01:00)
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.7.0
>
> Ops!
>
> [INFO]
>
>
> [INFO] Reactor Summary:
>
> [INFO]
>
> [I
Ops!
[INFO]
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] Apache Flex - ASJS SUCCESS [0.766s]
[INFO] frameworks SUCCESS [0.021s]
[INFO] projects .
Hi,
amazing, just so easy thanks to the hard work of you guys during several
weeks.
Tested with 3.1.1. result:
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] Apache Flex - FlexJS .. SUCCESS
[4:41.490s]
Hi,
what's the minimal maven version to test? I should go to latest (3.3.9) or
I can use other like for example 3.1.1 or other?
Thanks and amazing work btw! :)
2016-06-30 6:30 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
> It will likely be at least another week (probably two) until the first RC
> so there is time
It will likely be at least another week (probably two) until the first RC
so there is time to iron this stuff out. Where are the instructions for
building/testing NPM install? I don't think we did any big changes to the
folder structure.
-Alex
On 6/29/16, 5:47 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf o
Sorry, I have not been following the maven stuff closely. Will we need to
change how the npm install stuff works? Any chance someone can test it to
see what breaks?
I hope to find some time starting this weekend to get back into FlexJS work.
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Alex Har
Hi,
After helping Chris spend the last several weeks on Maven for FlexJS and
Falcon, I think we are at the point where any future changes will be
minor, so this is a re-start of the last call to examine a nightly build
for the things you usually check before you vote on a release.
And this time,
On 5/5/16, 2:48 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm trying a simple Hello World in IntelliJ I did at the time of the 0.6
>release (with the Josh tutorial in NExtGestAS3), now with 0.7 nigthly
>(through Flex SdK installer), and getting the same error as Ju
14 matches
Mail list logo
