IMO, it is all under ALv2, so we can do what we want. Usually we adopt
communities so we want to move the entire community in one move so there
is no confusion about where the active code and discussions are and we
clearly know we adopted all of the latest code.
In this case, there isn't an activ
IMO, it would be best if code we can't use never hits the ASF repos. We
should make sure we have a good copy somewhere maybe in a volunteer's
account on GitHub, or maybe there is already a good one out there, so we
don't lose the code from the internet. Then, we should probably get a
flex-as3comm
to build the lib, we
> > would need them ... That's the problem.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> > Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
> >
> >
> > Ursprüngliche Nachricht
> > Von: Alex Harui
> > D
endet: Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2016 11:09
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
I wouldn't care too much about all the logging framework integrations. We
have no data about usage but I suspect they are not used that much, if at
all. I assume you'
;
>
> Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
>
>
> Ursprüngliche Nachricht
> Von: Alex Harui
> Datum: 10.02.2016 19:05 (GMT+01:00)
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
>
> I haven't looked at the code in detail, but
Von: Alex Harui
Datum: 10.02.2016 19:05 (GMT+01:00)
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
I haven't looked at the code in detail, but if it is possible to have all
the logging libraries as external dependencies, it should be ok to accept
the AS3Co
that most
>is built with Flexmojos and I only gave up on non-maven stuff ;-)
>
>Chris
>
>
>Von: Christophe Herreman
>Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2016 10:56
>An: dev@flex.apache.org
>Betreff: Re: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopti
t: Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2016 10:56
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
Hi all,
sorry to jump in late here. I'm the original founder and one of the main
authors of AS3Commons and wanted to give some feedback on the things I read
here:
- renaming: I don&
helps keep the echo system a
> > little stronger.
> >
> >
> > -Mark
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: lizhi [mailto:s...@qq.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 2:15 AM
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopt
nt: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 2:15 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
>
> i thinks it is just a lib.it in the github is good.why put it to flex?
> the flex should clear.
> if the flex can not use the lib from github,should fixed,it is a
...@qq.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 2:15 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
i thinks it is just a lib.it in the github is good.why put it to flex?
the flex should clear.
if the flex can not use the lib from github,should fixed,it is a bug.
why put some
i thinks it is just a lib.it in the github is good.why put it to flex?
the flex should clear.
if the flex can not use the lib from github,should fixed,it is a bug.
why put some lib in flex?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Adopting-AS
12 matches
Mail list logo
