It's sure that Angular or React has more things right now (and many devs
right now enrolling their rows), but FlexJS is not comparable right now.
Looking at the way and speed things are happening here, I should expect
FlexJS to be a great technology
in the next 6 or 12 months, with many thinks othe
Probably true, but that's why we need volunteers to help us. Lots of
small contributions can really add up. And Apache projects are not
controlled by commercial entities so your contributions can have more
impact.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 7/7/16, 2:00 AM, "anshumanpradippatil1506"
wrote:
>I have work
I have worked lot with Flex and also now days working with angular2. One
thing I am sure about is FlexJS is far away from angular2, This is not only
about component(UI) creation there are many other thing which angular2
provides such as DI, Routing, documentation ..etc a long list
--
Vie
I think a comparison to polymer would be interesting as well.
Richard Oren
714-916-2102
> On 15 Jun 2015, at 1:06 pm, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
>
> Here is a rundown of how to do things with AngularJS 2.0:
> http://angular-tips.com/blog/2015/06/why-will-angular-2-rock/
>
> As I walk through t
Heh Mark - I have started my short adventure with AngularJS from exactly same
tutorial. Really good. :)
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-FlexJS-vs-AngularJS-2-0-tp47827p47899.html
On a side note, I remember fiddling with angular a while back. I bumped into
this free training for it [1] that gave a good start up understanding of how
some of the things work in it.
[1] http://campus.codeschool.com/courses/shaping-up-with-angular-js/intro
-Mark
-Original Message-
In my company colleagues did some internal project using webcomponents and
when I saw it for the first time I thought hey! We already have such things
in Flex - We can build such components really easy - This is nothing new. :)
Now in FlexJS it is also possible - maybe it's not so sophisticated as
Well I understand your point but, in this day and age, the success of a
framework will come down to how well it integrates with other frameworks
and now even languages. Just like our world with it's diverse ethnic and
cultural backgrounds, a truly successful framework can integrate things
created b
The problem with webcomponents is that it is not yet widely supported.
Only Chrome supports anything related to ShadowDOM, etc.
http://caniuse.com/#feat=shadowdom
The way I see this is that webcomponents is a way to make developers reuse
code easily and has no real runtime advantages. So, the app
Hi Om,
I really have no idea as I am more down in the mud right now witht he
compiler but, I know one thing on the horizon that we should integrate and
maybe even try with MXML or something and that is Web Components. I still
need to do more research but now that is seems like we are making headwa
10 matches
Mail list logo
