Hi Om, I really have no idea as I am more down in the mud right now witht he compiler but, I know one thing on the horizon that we should integrate and maybe even try with MXML or something and that is Web Components. I still need to do more research but now that is seems like we are making headway with AS and the DOM, I might spend some time reading.
I also wonder if one side of this discussion could be if Apache Flex can augment the development of Angular, don't know, just talking. I tried a couple of the Hello World examples and the TODO app about a month ago and totally hated add crap to HTML tags but, I did like the concept of binding and stuff but, then again, MXML has been doing this for ages and is Type strict. :) Mike On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:06 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here is a rundown of how to do things with AngularJS 2.0: > http://angular-tips.com/blog/2015/06/why-will-angular-2-rock/ > > As I walk through the details, I see the twists and turns they are going > through to do seemingly simple things. The single biggest reason for that > is that there is no MXML like malleable way to declaratively create the UI > and to wire things up. > > I am interested in seeing a step by step comparison of doing things the > FlexJS way vs. AngularJS2.0 way. Here are a few things we can concentrate > on: > > 1. Module loading > 2. Classes > 4. Components > 5. Design Patterns > 6. Events > 7. Calling webservices > 8. Skinning > ... > > Anyone wants to volunteer to help write this document? This would involve > understanding and writing FlexJS code samples. This would also involve > understanding AngularJS2.0 as well. Which is a benefit on its own. > > Volunteers? > > Thanks, > Om >
