On a side note, I remember fiddling with angular a while back. I bumped into this free training for it [1] that gave a good start up understanding of how some of the things work in it.
[1] http://campus.codeschool.com/courses/shaping-up-with-angular-js/intro -Mark -----Original Message----- From: omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of OmPrakash Muppirala Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 4:06 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: [FlexJS] FlexJS vs. AngularJS 2.0 Here is a rundown of how to do things with AngularJS 2.0: http://angular-tips.com/blog/2015/06/why-will-angular-2-rock/ As I walk through the details, I see the twists and turns they are going through to do seemingly simple things. The single biggest reason for that is that there is no MXML like malleable way to declaratively create the UI and to wire things up. I am interested in seeing a step by step comparison of doing things the FlexJS way vs. AngularJS2.0 way. Here are a few things we can concentrate on: 1. Module loading 2. Classes 4. Components 5. Design Patterns 6. Events 7. Calling webservices 8. Skinning ... Anyone wants to volunteer to help write this document? This would involve understanding and writing FlexJS code samples. This would also involve understanding AngularJS2.0 as well. Which is a benefit on its own. Volunteers? Thanks, Om
