Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-06 Thread Carlos Rovira
2016-05-06 9:16 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > Why put the entire project on hold? Don't people also want to > know if we can shim the MX and Spark libraries? > > -Alex > > MX and Spark is, for me, the viewable thing that could make people get interest (all eye candy things has that attraction power

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-06 Thread Alex Harui
On 5/5/16, 11:28 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" wrote: >2016-05-06 2:24 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > >> >> I'm totally in favor of having Maven artifacts. I don't understand the >> "all-Maven-for-every-build-step or nothing" attitude. So what if we use >> Ant for some of

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Alex Harui
On 5/5/16, 5:36 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Alex Harui wrote: >> >> I'm totally in favor of having Maven artifacts. I don't understand the >> "all-Maven-for-every-build-step or nothing" attitude. So what if we use >> Ant fo

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Carlos Rovira
2016-05-06 2:24 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > > I'm totally in favor of having Maven artifacts. I don't understand the > "all-Maven-for-every-build-step or nothing" attitude. So what if we use > Ant for some of it? > > -Alex > > Alex, cause is the nature of maven...is all or nothing. Embrace it or le

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 5/5/16, 1:36 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > wrote: > > > >For multiple targets, I think it should be possible by using different pom > >files for different targets. You could have a parent pom that calls thes

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Alex Harui
On 5/5/16, 1:36 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: > >For multiple targets, I think it should be possible by using different pom >files for different targets. You could have a parent pom that calls these >two poms if you want to chain them together. Sounds possible

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Alex Harui
;as soon as you try to build something that relies on "Core". In order to >>finish this, we need to clean this mess up and that's where I'm stuck, >>cause I cant do this without breaking things. >> >> Chris >> ____ &

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Harbs
a > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2016 21:00:23 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon > > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Christofer Dutz > wrote: > >> To me it feels like I'm the only one actually wanting to go to M

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
;2016-05-05 12:32 GMT+02:00 Christofer Dutz : > > > >> To me it feels like I'm the only one actually wanting to go to Maven :-( > >> > >> I'm even thinking about dropping the ball on this entirely, cause I > >>don't > >> want to be the onl

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Carlos Rovira
2016-05-05 20:24 GMT+02:00 Josh Tynjala : > but if it means that onboarding new > contributors (including those who have never used Maven before) is quick > and easy, The pain is to get to the maven setup done. Once in that state, it's so easy to contribute, since you only have to be worried ab

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
> > Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---- > Von: Harbs > Datum: 05.05.16 11:54 (GMT+01:00) > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon > > Got it. > > Once you have the Maven build working, it would be great to see what it

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Josh Tynjala
t; > > >Regarding Maven things, people working with maven knows how much pain is > > >to > > >make a working maven setup correctly, and it needs too much effort, but > as > > >things gets working, it's an invaluable tool. I think this is the way to > > >go, and

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Carlos Rovira
at at the computer the whole day trying > to get this one thing finished. > > I'm sick of it and so I'll check where to put a sensible amount of effort > into other projects at ApacheCon. > > Chris > > > Von: Alex Harui > G

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Josh Tynjala
fuly) :) > > > >Thanks for your effort, hope you decide to keep the great work > > > >Carlos > > > > > > > >2016-05-05 12:32 GMT+02:00 Christofer Dutz : > > > >> To me it feels like I'm the only one actually wanting to

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Alex Harui
ryone is happy with Ant and it's the overall >>impression >> I'm making things more complicated with Maven, I better invest my time >>in >> other projects. >> >> Chris >> >> >> Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. >> >>

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread yishayw
Like Carlos, I've been silently following and appreciating the work you and Alex have been doing on this. The last time I tried, and from posts I've seen here I'm not the only one, getting a full and clean installation of the dev environment was a big hassle. If your joint work ends up making this

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Alex Harui
On 5/5/16, 1:35 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Hi, > > >I just turned on public access to my SonarQube server ... there you can >see an up-to-date code analysis report for Falcon and FalconJX. It >clearly points out the Null Pointer hot spots. > > >http://dev.c-ware.de:1/overview?id=2471 > >

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Harbs
th Maven, I better invest my time in > other projects. > > Chris > > > Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. > > > Ursprüngliche Nachricht > Von: Harbs > Datum: 05.05.16 11:54 (GMT+01:00) > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [FALCO

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Carlos Rovira
pression > I'm making things more complicated with Maven, I better invest my time in > other projects. > > Chris > > > Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. > > > Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---- > Von: Harbs > Datum: 05.05.16 11:54 (GMT+01:0

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Harbs
n: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon > > Wow. That’s really nice. Seems like it’s very useful! > > Does this only work for Java, or can it be configured for other languages > (such as ActionScript)? > > Harbs > > On May 5

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Harbs
Wow. That’s really nice. Seems like it’s very useful! Does this only work for Java, or can it be configured for other languages (such as ActionScript)? Harbs On May 5, 2016, at 11:35 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi, > > > I just turned on public access to my SonarQube server ... there you c

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I just turned on public access to my SonarQube server … Nice! Do you know if we can generate/host this at Apache? Your’ve also given me another slide for one of my talks at ApacheCon - I owe you a beer. Thanks, Justin