So maybe it’s time to do the work on asjs in a separate maven branch? That way you don’t have to worry if something is broken while you pull things apart.
On May 5, 2016, at 11:37 PM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > > The problem with finishing the maven stuff for the ASJS part is that I am > trying to bring to paper how the parts fit together. Now it's hard but not > impossible to sketch how one module is built ... that's why I seem to have > managed to have "Core" build, but it starts getting insane as soon as you try > to build something that relies on "Core". In order to finish this, we need to > clean this mess up and that's where I'm stuck, cause I cant do this without > breaking things. > > Chris > ________________________________________ > Von: omup...@gmail.com <omup...@gmail.com> im Auftrag von OmPrakash Muppirala > <bigosma...@gmail.com> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2016 21:00:23 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon > > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > wrote: > >> To me it feels like I'm the only one actually wanting to go to Maven :-( >> > > You can always set up a poll to gauge interest. It is a good way to see > what the community wants. Also, in the end, it is your personal choice to > work on this or not. > > Personally, I am waiting for you to finish the maven integration so I can > start using it. Unfortunately, I don't have a lot of time to spare to > actually help you with coding this stuff. But you know that I try my best > to help you with testing your stuff. > > Thanks, > Om > > >> >> I'm even thinking about dropping the ball on this entirely, cause I don't >> want to be the only one complaining about the status quo. It was an insane >> amount of work to get falcon to build with Maven. I invested far nite time >> than I actually had. All I am hearing is that I'm making things more >> complicated. If everyone is happy with Ant and it's the overall impression >> I'm making things more complicated with Maven, I better invest my time in >> other projects. >> >> Chris >> >> >> Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. >> >> >> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- >> Von: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> >> Datum: 05.05.16 11:54 (GMT+01:00) >> An: dev@flex.apache.org >> Betreff: Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon >> >> Got it. >> >> Once you have the Maven build working, it would be great to see what it >> does with asjs. Who knows. Maybe we’ll be lucky… ;-) >> >> On May 5, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> wrote: >> >>> Actually it does support ActionScript. But unfortunately I need to build >> with Maven fire that and I doubt it will be able to understand the flexjs >> code with all these define blocks >>> >>> Chris >>> >>> >>> >>> Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. >>> >>> >>> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- >>> Von: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> >>> Datum: 05.05.16 11:02 (GMT+01:00) >>> An: dev@flex.apache.org >>> Betreff: Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon >>> >>> Wow. That’s really nice. Seems like it’s very useful! >>> >>> Does this only work for Java, or can it be configured for other >> languages (such as ActionScript)? >>> >>> Harbs >>> >>> On May 5, 2016, at 11:35 AM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> >>>> I just turned on public access to my SonarQube server ... there you can >> see an up-to-date code analysis report for Falcon and FalconJX. It clearly >> points out the Null Pointer hot spots. >>>> >>>> >>>> http://dev.c-ware.de:10000/overview?id=2471 >>>> >>>> >>>> Perhaps looking into this every now and then could help improving >> code-quality, stability and resillience of our software. >>>> >>>> >>>> Chris >>> >> >>
