Hi,
> IMO, it is all under ALv2, so we can do what we want.
Probably not the case for all files, from a quick look via [1] see [2]
(copyright Adobe), [3] is MIT Licensed (along with 8 odd other files), [4] is
also MIT license (again along with 8 other files). I’ve not looked into any of
these
Hi,
> Look further up this thread, and you’ll see that Christophe said it’s fine.
> Roland dissociated himself from the code, and Mike? said fine as well. That’s
> pretty much the main contributors with the exception of Jens Struwe.
Thanks, a summary of a long thread is always good.
Has anyone
Look further up this thread, and you’ll see that Christophe said it’s fine.
Roland dissociated himself from the code, and Mike? said fine as well. That’s
pretty much the main contributors with the exception of Jens Struwe.
On Jul 7, 2016, at 2:24 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has the fir
Hi,
Has the first step been done? i.e.as discussed in etc first email of this
thread that is to contact contributors and see if they are OK if we fork this?
I can help out with assembling license and notice if needed.
Thanks,
Justin
once, I would probably start whistling a tune and
>> pretending not to have read your email [?]
>>
>>
>> And would Justin help me with this?
>>
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> ________
>> Von: Alex Harui
>> Gesende
On 7/6/16, 5:47 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>That approach makes sense. We could put it in a “legacy” folder and bring
>in pieces as they seem needed or folks have time to sanitize the code —
>possibly with a different package structure.
Incrementally adopting AS3Commons is a fine approach as well. Wh
equired or asked by our users.
> In that case I would vote +1 ... if we should continue to maintain a huge
> pile of legacy functionality, I would vote -1.
>
>
> Chris
>
>
> Von: Harbs
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Juli 2016 14:24:29
> An:
I’d like to resurrect this discussion. It kind of fizzled out without a
resolution.
What’s bringing this back up, is I need to implement compression and
decompression of BinaryData. I believe that FZip has the code necessary for
that. (I may be wrong about that, though.)
On Feb 11, 2016, at 1:
components / methods.
xmlns:u="library://ns.apache.org/flex/utils"
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2015 12:25 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
I'm not a fan of changing th
On 12/6/15, 2:43 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Christophe Herreman, who also happens to be on our PMC, and one of the
>> major contributors to AS3Commons, is interested in having Apache Flex
>> adopt the AS3Commons code. I think this would be a good move for Apache
>> Flex because we us
egrate it back if people are requesting it to
>>be
>> supported.
>>
>> I think after Adobe announced giving up on Flex about 80% of the
>> frameworks died and only a hand full of great ones survived. I'm not
>> planning on keeping zombies alive, that none need,
Hi,
> Christophe Herreman, who also happens to be on our PMC, and one of the
> major contributors to AS3Commons, is interested in having Apache Flex
> adopt the AS3Commons code. I think this would be a good move for Apache
> Flex because we use some of AS3Commons in the Installer already so it
>
other libraries is AS3Commons dependent on
> that we need to be concerned about?
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> From: jude mailto:flexcapaci...@gmail.com>>
> Reply-To: "dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>" <
> dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.a
apache.org>>
Date: Saturday, December 5, 2015 at 8:30 PM
To: "dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>"
mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
If someone will help me with that I'll do it. What I'm thinking is when you
0:26 AM, Kessler CTR Mark J <
> > > > mark.kessler@usmc.mil> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Good point, we should keep it the same then. However if we do have
> > to
> > > > > reorganize it in the future, we can go over options
g the ball on all non-maven things ;-)
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von
> OmPrakash Muppirala
> Gesendet: Samstag, 5. Dezember 2015 09:33
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [DISC
o
> > > > reorganize it in the future, we can go over options then.
> > > >
> > > > -Mark
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> > > > Sent: Friday, De
> > >
> > > -Mark
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 10:52 AM
> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS
o over options then.
> >
> > -Mark
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> > Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 10:52 AM
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
> &
wrote:
> Good point, we should keep it the same then. However if we do have to
> reorganize it in the future, we can go over options then.
>
> -Mark
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 10:52 AM
>
Good point, we should keep it the same then. However if we do have to
reorganize it in the future, we can go over options then.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 10:52 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS
On 12/4/15, 5:05 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J"
wrote:
>+1
>
>Would we store it under something like "org.apache.flex.utils"?
>
I'd either leave it as is: org.as3commons
Or add apache: org.apache.as3commons
Or add apache.flex: org.apache.flex.as3commons
Or hint at Apache Commons: org.apache.commons
+1
Would we store it under something like "org.apache.flex.utils"?
-Mark
I use the async library in my feathers app right now. Some of the utilities
as well. The authors of all the librariues are top rate. :)
BTW, as3commons-asblocks, haha that was me that wrote all that! ;-)
Mike
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Nice find. Thanks, -Alex
>
> On
Nice find. Thanks, -Alex
On 12/3/15, 1:09 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>This seems to be confirmation:
>https://twitter.com/as3commons/status/185620600272855040
>
>It appears to be donated by the author, so I think we’re okay there.
>
>On Dec 3, 2015, at 11:00 PM, Harbs wrote:
>
>> I have heard that FZi
This seems to be confirmation:
https://twitter.com/as3commons/status/185620600272855040
It appears to be donated by the author, so I think we’re okay there.
On Dec 3, 2015, at 11:00 PM, Harbs wrote:
> I have heard that FZip moved to be included in AS3Commons, but I have no idea
> if that’s tru
I have heard that FZip moved to be included in AS3Commons, but I have no idea
if that’s true.
I assume Christophe should know the answer to that.
On Dec 3, 2015, at 10:51 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 12/3/15, 12:26 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>> The feature I probably use most often in the zip
On 12/3/15, 12:26 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>The feature I probably use most often in the zip functionality. It has
>the best zip library (formally FZip).
Do you know for a fact it uses Fzip? That could pose a problem since Fzip
isn't Apache-licensed. It wouldn't block adoption of the rest of the c
I use the AS3 Commons eventbus.
-Original Message-
From: Harbs [mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 3:26 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
The feature I probably use most often in the zip functionality. It has the
best zip
Ah that's why the name is familiar. I used it in the Installer :-)
Thanks for the info!
Regards,
Om
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Harbs wrote:
> The feature I probably use most often in the zip functionality. It has the
> best zip library (formally FZip).
>
> But there’s tons of helper fun
The feature I probably use most often in the zip functionality. It has the best
zip library (formally FZip).
But there’s tons of helper functions and containers as well.
Take a look here: https://github.com/AS3Commons
and here: https://code.google.com/p/as3-commons/source/browse/trunk
On Dec 3
Do we have a list of features or an URL we can look at?
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Harbs wrote:
> +1.
>
> There’s lot’s useful stuff in AS3Commons.
>
> On Dec 3, 2015, at 7:18 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > It has been my understanding that any existing code base that
+1.
There’s lot’s useful stuff in AS3Commons.
On Dec 3, 2015, at 7:18 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It has been my understanding that any existing code base that gets stored
> in an Apache Flex repo must be "donated" via the Apache Software Grant
> process, which essentially requires that th
33 matches
Mail list logo
