x27;t do it as Alexander explained me IIRC.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 23:13
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: License Stuff
I was just wondering if FM was dealing with such a situation :)
--
-Message d'origine-
De : christofer.d...@c-ware.de [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de]
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 23:11
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : AW: License Stuff
Hi Frederic,
but that's not quite true ... each maven repo has a root and relative to
that the groupId, artifactI
I was just wondering if FM was dealing with such a situation :)
-Message d'origine-
De : christofer.d...@c-ware.de [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de]
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 23:11
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : AW: License Stuff
Hi Frederic,
but that's not quite tru
n't have to mess with its internals.
>
>Chris
>
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 22:46
>An: dev@flex.apache.org
>Betreff: Re: License Stuff
>
>Like I said, I don't know much about
1]
>
>-Fred
>
>[1]
>http://apacheflexvm.cloudapp.net/artifactory/simple/ext-release-local/com/
>ad
>obe/air/
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:46
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : Re: License
MAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 22:56
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: RE: License Stuff
> The FP SDK is just playerglobal.swc. It is a single file so if there
> was
a pom.xml next to it, would that be sufficient?
Thanks for make me recall again :-)
Should a pom file
associated with this zip file be sufficient?
Om
> -Fred
>
> [1]
>
> http://apacheflexvm.cloudapp.net/artifactory/simple/ext-release-local/com/ad
> obe/air/
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Envoyé :
Alex, we
>need artifacts and classifiers along with the project descriptor, I
>mean trees entire mavenized SDKs. did I miss or forgot something again
>:-) ?
>
>-Fred
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre
>
: mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:46
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: License Stuff
Like I said, I don't know much about Maven.
IIRC, there was some thinking that, because the FP and AIR SDKs are the
"leaf" of a dependency tree, there wasn't much more than a pom.xml needed.
I beli
the feasibility I still have.
>
>Thanks,
>-Fred
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
>Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:37
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : RE: License Stuff
>
>I can't see how 1 or more pom.x
have.
Thanks,
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:37
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: License Stuff
I can't see how 1 or more pom.xml on their server could help Alex, we need
artifacts and classifiers
artifacts and classifiers along with the project descriptor, I mean trees
>entire mavenized SDKs. did I miss or forgot something again :-) ?
>
>-Fred
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:32
>À : dev@fl
@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:32
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: License Stuff
Adobe did not want to deal with registration or a way to avoid the license
dialog, but I'm pretty sure we got permission to put up pom.xml files on the
current downloads server.
On 10/29/13 2:2
just for that.
>
>-Fred
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:20
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : Re: License Stuff
>
>
>
>On 10/29/13 2:14 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
I meant, invest any resources even IIRC
-Message d'origine-
De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:29
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: License Stuff
IIRC Adobe didn't want to invest in a server just for that.
-Fred
--
IIRC Adobe didn't want to invest in a server just for that.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:20
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: License Stuff
On 10/29/13 2:14 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
&
fer.d...@c-ware.de [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de]
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:01
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : AW: License Stuff
Hi Frederic,
well whenever I do a Flexmojos Release, I have to deploy quite a lot of
files. That was never really a problem.
I guess it should be possible to sta
On 10/29/13 2:14 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>Also, I can retrieve it at the moment but when I read the specific Air
>license terms, I understood it couldn't be distributed in piece but only
>in
>only one full and original distribution.
Yes, that's probably true, and the runtimes are part of t
e Nachricht-
>Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 21:31
>An: dev@flex.apache.org
>Betreff: Re: AW: License Stuff
>
>
>
>On 10/29/13 1:13 PM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
> wrote:
>
>>But if the deal Velo
:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:02
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: License Stuff
I hadn't noticed that "intranet" restriction before. I would contact Adobe
via the link where it says: "contact an Adobe Mobile & Devices
representative".
Mak
Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 21:31
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: License Stuff
On 10/29/13 1:13 PM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
wrote:
>But if the deal Velo and Sonatype had with Adobe was enough, I guess
>this would
On 10/29/13 2:02 PM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
wrote:
>It should be able, but it's not the usual way to go. Think about CI
>Servers ... how do you want to handle them?
Via some registration key. I think that was actually your idea. Once you
accept it stores (somehow) that you accepted and n
t-
Von: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 21:31
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: RE: License Stuff
Chris, I just had a look at the deployment process requires by Sonatype,
something I did 2 years ago, so, I didn't remembered well, it w
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 21:50
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: RE: License Stuff
> Looks like it is pretty easy to get a license. Just ask here [1]
I meant in order to publicly distribute adobe a
hy I had liked a pointer on a such
>license agreement used by Sonatype and how to get it.
>
>Thanks,
>-Fred
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 21:35
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : Re: License
13 21:35
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: License Stuff
On 10/29/13 1:23 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>Thanks for reminding me, it was completely out of my head.
>
>> I may still set up a simple "business" to distribute the same package
>> as
>Ad
yé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 21:35
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: License Stuff
On 10/29/13 1:23 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>Thanks for reminding me, it was completely out of my head.
>
>> I may still set up a simple "business" to distribute the same packa
On 10/29/13 1:23 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>Thanks for reminding me, it was completely out of my head.
>
>> I may still set up a simple "business" to distribute the same package as
>Adobe 4.6 but a license acceptance will still be required which AFAIK
>still
>poses a problem for Maven.
>
>Th
ept a compress file as a bundle of all signed
artifacts or something else ?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : christofer.d...@c-ware.de [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de]
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 21:14
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : AW: License Stuff
But if the deal Velo and Sonatyp
ogins?
>
>Chris
>
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 21:08
>An: dev@flex.apache.org
>Betreff: Re: License Stuff
>
>We did not pursue that approach because Apache supposedly only
>distributes
nteractive process.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 21:08
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: License Stuff
We did not pursue that approach because Apache supposedly only distributes
source code with open licenses. Even if t
n build.
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 21:08
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: License Stuff
We did not pursue that approach because Apache supposedly only distributes
source code with open licenses. Even if there was su
>Not sure if it has been already asked but can't Apache / Apache Flex
>sign a
>Distribution agreement ?
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 17:57
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : Re: Lic
Not sure if it has been already asked but can't Apache / Apache Flex sign a
Distribution agreement ?
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 17:57
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: License Stuff
On 10/29/
On 10/29/13 7:16 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
wrote:
>Hi Guys,
>
>I am currently talking to Brian Fox from Sonatype. He told me that
>Sonatype signed a Distribution Agreement with Adobe had been signed in
>2008, but this has expired 2009, but it seems they are willing to re-sign
>such an Agr
QUITE A LOT :)
As soon as possible!
Good work Chris!
Miguel
> From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:16:16 +0100
> Subject: License Stuff
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I am currently talking to Brian Fox from Sonatype. He told me t
Hi Guys,
I am currently talking to Brian Fox from Sonatype. He told me that Sonatype
signed a Distribution Agreement with Adobe had been signed in 2008, but this
has expired 2009, but it seems they are willing to re-sign such an Agreement.
For which parts would we Need an Agreement from Adobe?
37 matches
Mail list logo
