Re: Installer Revisited

2014-01-14 Thread Alex Harui
need both? If so, what order? > > > Best regards, >TBraz > > >-Original Message- >From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com] >Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 3:49 PM >To: dev@flex.apache.org >Subject: Re: Installer Revisited > >Hi, > >&

RE: Installer Revisited

2014-01-14 Thread Tom Brazil
Thanks, Justin. Do they need both? If so, what order? Best regards, TBraz -Original Message- From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 3:49 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: Installer Revisited Hi, > Is there a means to inst

RE: Installer Revisited

2014-01-13 Thread Maurice Amsellem
-Message d'origine- De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : lundi 13 janvier 2014 22:32 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Installer Revisited If you have an application built with the Flex SDK, your client's shouldn't need to install the Flex SDK in order to use

Re: Installer Revisited

2014-01-13 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Is there a means to install ApacheFlex without requiring the AIR package? Yes. Look at the scripts in the IDE directory makeApacheFlexForIDE and constructFlexForIDE. Thanks, Justin

Re: Installer Revisited

2014-01-13 Thread Alex Harui
opment, there is no need for >it after install... > > >TBraz > >-Original Message- >From: Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] >Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 5:59 AM >To: dev@flex.apache.org >Subject: RE: Installer Revisited > >>Assuming I d

RE: Installer Revisited

2014-01-13 Thread Tom Brazil
t: RE: Installer Revisited >Assuming I don't target an AIR application, then I suppose the AIR SDK is >required, but this is installed by the installer. AFAIU, that's correct Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Tom Chiverton [mailto:t...@extravision.com] Envoyé : lundi

Re: Installer Revisited

2014-01-05 Thread Alex Harui
On 1/5/14 6:33 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote: >> I might also be able to >> post my binaries after I get a few kinks worked out. > >Giving that a go - again, what's the FLEX_HOME variable required for here >? Falcon is currently set up to be "injected" into a Flex or FlexJS SDK. I have done most

Re: Installer Revisited

2014-01-05 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Saturday 04 Jan 2014 16:11:39 Alex Harui wrote: > Yeah, wiki stuff is out of date. You'll need to set up environment > variables. Hopefully the error messages are informative enough to give > you a clue. Well, yes, but I didn't understand why the Flex compiler needs a path to a Flex install

Re: Installer Revisited

2014-01-04 Thread Alex Harui
I posted my binary packages here: http://people.apache.org/~aharui/FlexJS/binaries/ Running "ant -f installer.xml install" worked for me on mac. I'm going to be trying on Windows tomorrow. You will need to modify the local.properties to point to the installer-config-4.0.xml and other packages.

Re: Installer Revisited

2014-01-04 Thread Alex Harui
Yeah, wiki stuff is out of date. You'll need to set up environment variables. Hopefully the error messages are informative enough to give you a clue. I'll try to take a shot at updating the wiki. I might also be able to post my binaries after I get a few kinks worked out. -Alex On 1/4/14 6:03

Re: Installer Revisited

2014-01-04 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Friday 03 Jan 2014 19:23:58 Alex Harui wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Thanks for trying it. I think these scripts are expecting to be run > inside an expanded binary package. Run ant release, falken@wopr:~/workspace/flex-falcon$ ant release Buildfile: /home/falken/workspace/flex-falcon/build.xml chec

Re: Installer Revisited

2014-01-03 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Tom, Thanks for trying it. I think these scripts are expecting to be run inside an expanded binary package. Run ant release, get the binary package from the out folder, expand that somewhere and then run the installer.xml from in there. Thanks, -Alex On 1/3/14 10:53 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wro

Re: Installer Revisited

2014-01-03 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Friday 03 Jan 2014 09:19:13 you wrote: > On 02/01/2014 18:06, Alex Harui wrote: > > OK. I'm essentially ignorant as to how installs happen on Linux. If you > > have time, can you try to get the installer.xml files to run for > > flex-falcon/flex-asjs on Linux? Separate sections below for each

Re: Installer Revisited

2014-01-03 Thread Alex Harui
So one of the goals of rewriting the installer is to get us out of the business of needing to create platform-dependent artifacts. Ideally, the next release of the Apache Flex Installer would be the last one ever. All further installs are done by having the Installer execute an ant script in a GU

Re: Installer Revisited

2014-01-03 Thread Tom Chiverton
On 02/01/2014 18:06, Alex Harui wrote: OK. I'm essentially ignorant as to how installs happen on Linux. If you have time, can you try to get the installer.xml files to run for flex-falcon/flex-asjs on Linux? It's a bit like .dmg on MacOS in that a single file contains the dependency and metada

Re: Installer Revisited

2014-01-02 Thread Alex Harui
On 1/2/14 8:51 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote: >On 02/01/2014 16:23, Alex Harui wrote: >> Sort of. I'm not envisioning a shell based installer. Just an >>AIR-based >> installer like we have now, or else we assume you have Ant installed and >> you download an archive, unpack it, and run "ant instal

Re: Installer Revisited

2014-01-02 Thread Tom Chiverton
On 02/01/2014 16:23, Alex Harui wrote: Sort of. I'm not envisioning a shell based installer. Just an AIR-based installer like we have now, or else we assume you have Ant installed and you download an archive, unpack it, and run "ant install" or something like that. My thoughts are that second m

Re: Installer Revisited

2014-01-02 Thread Alex Harui
Oh, I forgot. If you try to run installer.xml from flex-asjs, you need to have run "ant release" in flex-falcon and point to the bin.zip with something like: falcon.url.path=file:///Users/aharui/git/flex/master/flex-falcon/out On 1/2/14 8:23 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > >On 1/2/14 3:05 AM, "Tom

Re: Installer Revisited

2014-01-02 Thread Alex Harui
On 1/2/14 3:05 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote: >But it sounds like the plan is to structure things so that the installer >(AIR or Shell based) can download an archive and then just unpack it and >run ant, and ant will take care of putting stuff in the correct place ? >And the list of things to down

Re: Installer Revisited

2014-01-02 Thread Tom Chiverton
On 17/12/2013 14:15, Alex Harui wrote: You are welcome to take on writing the installer.xml for flex-sdk, or I will get to it over the next few weeks. My current plan (once I get past this PGP Key fiasco) is to get the flex-asjs and flex-falcon ant scripts to work then get ant_on_air to run them

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-18 Thread Tom Chiverton
an be installed at the same time. However if you have an environmental variable, It can only be pointed to one version at a time. -Mark -Original Message- From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:t...@extravision.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 9:55 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: Inst

RE: Installer Revisited

2013-12-17 Thread Kessler CTR Mark J
: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: Installer Revisited You can have multiple different JDK versions at once can't you ? Even on Windows ? I didn't think we were suggesting not having a GUI installer for the SDK, just that under the hood it would call an ant task ? Tom On 17/12/

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-17 Thread Tom Chiverton
p...@gmail.com] De la part de OmPrakash Muppirala Envoyé : lundi 16 décembre 2013 20:15 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Installer Revisited On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Alex Harui wrote: That's interesting. On Mac, folks are given a dmg file that essentially installs the installer

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-17 Thread Nicholas Kwiatkowski
Maurice > > -Message d'origine- > De : omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] De la part de OmPrakash > Muppirala > Envoyé : lundi 16 décembre 2013 20:15 > À : dev@flex.apache.org > Objet : Re: Installer Revisited > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Alex

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-17 Thread Alex Harui
I checked in an ant script for flex-falcon. The proposed pattern is to put it all in an installer.xml file. It presumes you have expanded the binary kit and am running ant -f installer.xml in that expanded kit. It will download and copy stuff into that same folder. I guess maybe we should add a

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-17 Thread Tom Chiverton
On 16/12/2013 20:24, Alex Harui wrote: On 12/16/13 11:14 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: On Linux, we can probably assume that Ant is already installed, or just a 'yum install' away from being available. That way, they can just use the ant script just as well. Interesting. Tom, do you agre

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-16 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, The stats of which versions of windows use the installer is unclear. We did have one person use the installer to install 4.11 on Windows NT. Wonder how that worked out for them? Justin

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-16 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Do you guys know the breakdown of which OS's are downloading? Via the installer it's 74% window, 25% OSX and 1% linux. Via other mean we don't know ie compiling the source or using the binaries and then running the ide scripts. I usually use the IDE scripts. Thanks, Justin

RE: Installer Revisited

2013-12-16 Thread Mark Fuqua
sler CTR Mark J [mailto:mark.kessler@usmc.mil] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 1:49 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: RE: Installer Revisited " I heard it isn't on WinXP. Do we need to support that?" XP support ends April 8th 2014 [1]. I would say not to support it. [1] http://windows.m

RE: Installer Revisited

2013-12-16 Thread Maurice Amsellem
r language you are working with. Don't you think so? Maurice -Message d'origine- De : omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] De la part de OmPrakash Muppirala Envoyé : lundi 16 décembre 2013 20:15 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Installer Revisited On Mon, Dec 16,

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-16 Thread Alex Harui
On 12/16/13 11:14 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: > >On Linux, we can probably assume that Ant is already installed, or just a >'yum install' away from being available. That way, they can just use the >ant script just as well. Interesting. Tom, do you agree that Ant would be sufficient for a

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-16 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > That's interesting. > > On Mac, folks are given a dmg file that essentially installs the installer > and I don't believe it requires that AIR is already installed. Or am I > wrong about that? > Yes, no need for an AIR install. The installer

RE: Installer Revisited

2013-12-16 Thread Kessler CTR Mark J
ay, December 16, 2013 1:03 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: Installer Revisited That's interesting. On Mac, folks are given a dmg file that essentially installs the installer and I don't believe it requires that AIR is already installed. Or am I wrong about that? On Linux, you

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-16 Thread Alex Harui
That's interesting. On Mac, folks are given a dmg file that essentially installs the installer and I don't believe it requires that AIR is already installed. Or am I wrong about that? On Linux, you're saying the package we create still requires a separate install of AIR? I'm not a huge fan of

RE: Installer Revisited

2013-12-16 Thread Maurice Amsellem
: dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Installer Revisited On 16/12/2013 10:44, Maurice Amsellem wrote: >> AIR isn't required for*using* the SDK one it is built, right ? > Do you mean AIR runtime, or AIR SDK ? > > Maurice AIR the runtime. Assuming I don't target an AIR applic

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-16 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > AIR isn't required for *using* the SDK one it is built, right ? Correct you can build and install an SDK without using the installer - take a look at the scripts in the ide directory. Thanks, Justin

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-16 Thread Tom Chiverton
On 16/12/2013 10:44, Maurice Amsellem wrote: AIR isn't required for*using* the SDK one it is built, right ? Do you mean AIR runtime, or AIR SDK ? Maurice AIR the runtime. Assuming I don't target an AIR application, then I suppose the AIR SDK is required, but this is installed by the installe

RE: Installer Revisited

2013-12-16 Thread Maurice Amsellem
>AIR isn't required for *using* the SDK one it is built, right ? Do you mean AIR runtime, or AIR SDK ? Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Tom Chiverton [mailto:t...@extravision.com] Envoyé : lundi 16 décembre 2013 11:38 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Installer Revisi

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-16 Thread Tom Chiverton
On 15/12/2013 15:51, Maurice Amsellem wrote: In which case, would it make sense that the installer won't be based solely on Adobe technology? Maurice Ahh, interesting, because I was starting to work on an PPA for Ubuntu users that would correctly install AIR and it's dependencies and then the

RE: Installer Revisited

2013-12-15 Thread Maurice Amsellem
ler" up our sleeves ... Regards, Maurice -Message d'origine- De : omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] De la part de OmPrakash Muppirala Envoyé : dimanche 15 décembre 2013 18:01 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Installer Revisited On Dec 15, 2013 8:37 AM, "Alex Ha

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-15 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
. Thanks, Om > >> > >> Maurice > >> > >> -Message d'origine- > >> De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] > >> Envoyé : dimanche 15 décembre 2013 16:35 > >> À : dev@flex.apache.org > >> Objet : Re: Installer Revis

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-15 Thread Alex Harui
t; In which case, would it make sense that the installer won't be based >> solely on Adobe technology? >> >> Maurice >> >> -Message d'origine- >> De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] >> Envoyé : dimanche 15 décembre 2013 16:35 &

RE: Installer Revisited

2013-12-15 Thread aYo ~
se that the installer won't be based > solely on Adobe technology? > > Maurice > > -Message d'origine- > De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] > Envoyé : dimanche 15 décembre 2013 16:35 > À : dev@flex.apache.org > Objet : Re: Installer Revisited >

RE: Installer Revisited

2013-12-15 Thread Maurice Amsellem
: dimanche 15 décembre 2013 16:35 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Installer Revisited Ah, sorry, missed seeing that earlier. My personal goal is that, someday, a newbie's initial experience when coming to Apache Flex to learn about Flex is a showcase for Flex. That our current landin

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-15 Thread Alex Harui
50 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote: >Any reaction to the Java-based installer proposition below (Point B) ? > >Maurice > >-Message d'origine- >De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] >Envoyé : jeudi 12 décembre 2013 09:17 >À : dev@flex

RE: Installer Revisited

2013-12-15 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Any reaction to the Java-based installer proposition below (Point B) ? Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] Envoyé : jeudi 12 décembre 2013 09:17 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : RE: Installer Revisited (Point A) >I tho

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-12 Thread Alex Harui
reliminary" discussions on what could be done >in the near future. > >Regards, > >Maurice > >-----Message d'origine- >De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com] >Envoyé : jeudi 12 décembre 2013 09:52 >À : dev@flex.apache.org >Objet : Re: I

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-12 Thread Erik de Bruin
the UI: > - fast download and install > - does not break when a resource is not available > - well thought and efficient UI. > > That's only my personal view. > > Maurice > > -Message d'origine- > De : Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] > Envoyé

RE: Installer Revisited

2013-12-12 Thread Maurice Amsellem
ns on what could be done in the near future. Regards, Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com] Envoyé : jeudi 12 décembre 2013 09:52 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Installer Revisited Hi, A few questions: The installer can also run locally ie

RE: Installer Revisited

2013-12-12 Thread Maurice Amsellem
-Message d'origine- De : Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] Envoyé : jeudi 12 décembre 2013 10:08 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Installer Revisited The FlexJS SDK build is a little more involved than a 'regular' Flex SDK build, from an Installer point of view. Ins

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-12 Thread Erik de Bruin
The FlexJS SDK build is a little more involved than a 'regular' Flex SDK build, from an Installer point of view. Instead of adding yet another monolithic code path to the Installer, Alex's idea boils down to building a 'can handle all builds' installer by using existing ant build files. A big +1 o

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-12 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, A few questions: The installer can also run locally ie not download anything but copy local files. Can we do this with ant for air? With ant for air how would be be able to select the AIR and FP version and only download the correct version? Can we default to current latest versions? Would a

RE: Installer Revisited

2013-12-12 Thread Maurice Amsellem
e -Message d'origine- De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : jeudi 12 décembre 2013 01:42 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Installer Revisited The ant_on_air stuff is brand new and full of bugs. I thought Air followed redirects. There must be code in the installer tha

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-11 Thread Alex Harui
Right, ant_on_air is only for the installer to use to run an ant target without ant installed. That target will be added to build.xml or its own xml file and just upgrade a binary package into an IDE compatible directory structure. It should not need to compile anything. All other targets will r

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-11 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Little bit lost on the thread here - but I assume that you'll still be able to build a source and binary release without using ant for air. I rather not add yet another stumbling block to compile or use on a CI machine. Thanks, Justin

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-11 Thread Alex Harui
>Maurice > >-Message d'origine- >De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] >Envoyé : jeudi 12 décembre 2013 00:53 >À : dev@flex.apache.org >Objet : Re: Installer Revisited > >Yup, makes sense. > >-Alex > >On 12/11/13 3:18 PM, "Maurice Amsellem&quo

RE: Installer Revisited

2013-12-11 Thread Maurice Amsellem
#x27;origine- De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : jeudi 12 décembre 2013 00:53 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Installer Revisited Yup, makes sense. -Alex On 12/11/13 3:18 PM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote: >>I guess it is a separate question whether the mai

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-11 Thread Alex Harui
tc...) > >Makes sense ? > >Maurice > >-Message d'origine- >De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] >Envoyé : jeudi 12 décembre 2013 00:00 >À : dev@flex.apache.org >Objet : Re: Installer Revisited > > > >On 12/11/13 2:53 PM, "Maurice Amsell

RE: Installer Revisited

2013-12-11 Thread Maurice Amsellem
dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Installer Revisited On 12/11/13 2:53 PM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote: >Hi Alex, > >I like better the first idea (that the script is in the first package >to download, in a known place). >Furthermore, that would merge the logic for building the SDK

Re: Installer Revisited

2013-12-11 Thread Alex Harui
get other stuff and copy it into the right places. But essentially, the script is co-located in the binary packages files. -Alex > >-Message d'origine- >De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] >Envoyé : mercredi 11 décembre 2013 23:26 >À : dev@flex.apache.org >Obje

RE: Installer Revisited

2013-12-11 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Found it: ant_on_air is in flex_utility repo. -Message d'origine- De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] Envoyé : mercredi 11 décembre 2013 23:54 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : RE: Installer Revisited Hi Alex, I like better the first idea (that the script

RE: Installer Revisited

2013-12-11 Thread Maurice Amsellem
"? I googled for it, but found nothing. Is it something already existing, or that has to be done yet? Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mercredi 11 décembre 2013 23:26 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Installer Revisited Hi, I'

Installer Revisited

2013-12-11 Thread Alex Harui
Hi, I've checked in enough stuff into flex-utilities/ant_on_air to try to build out SDK installation in Ant. My plan is to create an ant script that does what the current installer does, make sure it works in Ant, then try to get it to work in ant_on_air. Of course, that will be a bit ugly since