On 15/12/2013 15:51, Maurice Amsellem wrote:
In which case, would it make sense that the installer won't be based solely on
Adobe technology?
Maurice
Ahh, interesting, because I was starting to work on an PPA for Ubuntu
users that would correctly install AIR and it's dependencies and then
the existing installer; think of it as the
apache-flex-sdk-installer-installer. This would solve a lot of pain
points for Ubuntu users, and the same thing would work for .rpm systems too.
Now I am wondering that as the GUI installer is just a fairly thin
wrapper around a licence agreement, some file fetches and batch scripts,
weather I shouldn't just skip installing the installer and just create a
package that fetches and runs the files and scripts (from the same XML
config file the AIR app uses) ?
AIR isn't required for *using* the SDK one it is built, right ?
Tom