>AIR isn't required for *using* the SDK one it is built, right ? Do you mean AIR runtime, or AIR SDK ?
Maurice -----Message d'origine----- De : Tom Chiverton [mailto:t...@extravision.com] Envoyé : lundi 16 décembre 2013 11:38 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Installer Revisited On 15/12/2013 15:51, Maurice Amsellem wrote: > In which case, would it make sense that the installer won't be based solely > on Adobe technology? > > Maurice Ahh, interesting, because I was starting to work on an PPA for Ubuntu users that would correctly install AIR and it's dependencies and then the existing installer; think of it as the apache-flex-sdk-installer-installer. This would solve a lot of pain points for Ubuntu users, and the same thing would work for .rpm systems too. Now I am wondering that as the GUI installer is just a fairly thin wrapper around a licence agreement, some file fetches and batch scripts, weather I shouldn't just skip installing the installer and just create a package that fetches and runs the files and scripts (from the same XML config file the AIR app uses) ? AIR isn't required for *using* the SDK one it is built, right ? Tom
