On 9/6/13 4:29 PM, "Mark Kessler" wrote:
>Well I found a better way to check it out if we want to find out when it
>first started. Look through the log on the image file. You put the
>image
>in on 9/5/1012 and it shows correctly... It shows the image without a
>line. Carol put in a new ve
Well I found a better way to check it out if we want to find out when it
first started. Look through the log on the image file. You put the image
in on 9/5/1012 and it shows correctly... It shows the image without a
line. Carol put in a new version on 12/21/2012 when she added that huge
datag
On 9/6/13 3:58 PM, "Mark Kessler" wrote:
>
>My question would be do the tests no show the image compare failures or
>further errors if a previous testID failed higher up in the same file.
>Such as [4] which I fixed.
Theoretically, the tests continue on unless an exception is thrown, so if
the t
The line was in the image for months at least. Not sure why it wasn't
found until recently. But [1] and [2] were specifically about the DataGrid
itemEditor stopping in weird places while editing after having scrolled.
Which to mean would have been caused a line to appear since it would have
disp
On 9/6/13 1:48 AM, "Mark Kessler" wrote:
>Yeah I got the horizontal line myself. I bet that was originally a bug
>from before we fixed the scrolling itemEdit issue. The correct image
>should not show the line through the box.
Hmm. That scrolling position issue wasn't one of the three changes
Yeah I got the horizontal line myself. I bet that was originally a bug
from before we fixed the scrolling itemEdit issue. The correct image
should not show the line through the box.
-Mark
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Ran the tests myself. The bitmap shows a horizonta
Ran the tests myself. The bitmap shows a horizontal line through the
reference image that is not in the result image. Please verify that you
are seeing the same. You'll need to investigate whether that line should
be there or not and if it is, figure out which code change resulted in the
line no
On 9/5/13 3:43 PM, "Mark Kessler" wrote:
>Ok so I ran [1] with createdImages and the test passed. Deleted the two
>XML files it created and ran [2] without the create option and it still
>passed. Image looks fine. So do I upload the two new baseline images ?
Well, what are the differences be
Ok so I ran [1] with createdImages and the test passed. Deleted the two
XML files it created and ran [2] without the create option and it still
passed. Image looks fine. So do I upload the two new baseline images ?
[1] mini_run.sh -caseName=Editable_variableRowHeight
tests/gumbo/components/Dat
mm...@flex.apache.org; kesslerconsult...@gmail.com;
>jmcl...@apache.org; bigosma...@gmail.com; ftho...@apache.org;
>cyrill.za...@gmail.com
>Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella #290
>
>See <http://localhost:8080/job/flex-sdk_mustella/290/changes>
>
>Changes:
>
&
mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 12:41 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella #290
On 9/5/13 6:47 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" wrote:
>Not sure how we changed a bitmap for variableRowHeight with the 3 below
>commits. I ca
From: flex.muste...@gmail.com [mailto:flex.muste...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 9:30 AM
To: comm...@flex.apache.org; kesslerconsult...@gmail.com; jmcl...@apache.org;
bigosma...@gmail.com; ftho...@apache.org; cyrill.za...@gmail.com
Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mus
12 matches
Mail list logo
