Hi,
> Bummer that we can’t tell it from other errors. For these older releases,
> can you determine roughly how many more failures are occurring per day
> after October 8 vs before?
Not easy to tell from the data one of the 2032 errors fell to zero at that
point for 4.12.1 (so yo
ne roughly how many more failures are occurring per day
after October 8 vs before?
Folks in the community, if you are stymied by installer failures when
attempting to install Apache Flex SDK 4.12.1 or older combined with
AIR/FlashPlayer 15.0, let us know on this thread so we can get a better
Hi,
> Just so I’m clear, are your numbers the number of folks attempting 4.12.1
> and older installs or the number attempting and failing?
Yes.
> Do the analytics show specifically when folks try an older build with FP/AIR
> 15?
No, just the Flex version.
> Judah’s failur
Just so I’m clear, are your numbers the number of folks attempting 4.12.1
and older installs or the number attempting and failing? Do the analytics
show specifically when folks try an older build with FP/AIR 15? Judah’s
failures should be in there in the last 24 hours or so. We did the
cutover
t; What do the analytics show for how often folks attempt
> to download 4.12.1 and earlier?
It's about 10-20% of installs on any given day and we get around 200-250
installs a day. I guess not everyone wants the latest.
Thanks,
Justin
On 11/21/14, 11:35 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> We switched 4.12.1 and earlier to legacy a while back to deal with the
>> SourceForge download problem. It appears that the Installer was never
>> upgraded to handle the versionID attribute we added
Hi,
> We switched 4.12.1 and earlier to legacy a while back to deal with the
> SourceForge download problem. It appears that the Installer was never
> upgraded to handle the versionID attribute we added to the Ant install
> scripts that disambiguate 15 from 15-beta.
So that could
r
>code. Can you provide more information to what the error is and if
>possible what is required to fix it. ie is it a config file change or an
>installer change?
We switched 4.12.1 and earlier to legacy a while back to deal with the
SourceForge download problem. It appears that the Inst
HI,
> The new ant-script-based install like 4.13.0 works fine but the legacy
> installs will have trouble with AIR 15.
How is 4.2.1 a legacy install as it's still using the "new" ant for air code.
Can you provide more information to what the error is and if possible what is
required to fix it.
I've copied the log here.
>>
>>Version 3.1.0 (mac)
>>Using Locale: en_US
>>Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI.
>>AIR version 15.0
>>Flash Player version 15.0
>>Creating Apache Flex home
>>Creating temporary directory
>>Dow
Locale: en_US
>Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI.
>AIR version 15.0
>Flash Player version 15.0
>Creating Apache Flex home
>Creating temporary directory
>Downloading Apache Flex SDK from:
>http://archive.apache.org/dist/flex/4.12.1/binaries/apache-flex-sdk-4.12.1
&g
pache Flex home
Creating temporary directory
Downloading Apache Flex SDK from:
http://archive.apache.org/dist/flex/4.12.1/binaries/apache-flex-sdk-4.12.1-bin.tar.gz
Verifying Apache Flex SDK MD5 Signature
The Apache Flex SDK MD5 Signature of the downloaded files matches the
reference. The file is
I have found the wrong definition is from somewhere else on runtime as you
suspect, there is nothing wrong with 4.12.1.
Thank you very much for answering my question, it is really helpful.
Best,
-Gary
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Mark Kessler
wrote:
> Well I took a look at it using
ubject: Could you help me with this weird problem when upgrading to
> 4.12.1 plz?
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to upgrade a program to Flex 4.12.1, it has a error inside
> DataGrid.as:
>
> ReferenceError: Error #1069: Property sortCompareType not found on
> mx.controls.dataGridCla
>-Mark
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Gary Yang [mailto:flashflex...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 9:07 PM
>To: aha...@adobe.com; dev@flex.apache.org
>Cc: Greg Gordon
>Subject: Could you help me with this weird problem when upgrading to
>4.12.1 plz?
>
&
Greg Gordon
Subject: Could you help me with this weird problem when upgrading to 4.12.1 plz?
Hi,
I am trying to upgrade a program to Flex 4.12.1, it has a error inside
DataGrid.as:
ReferenceError: Error #1069: Property sortCompareType not found on
mx.controls.dataGridClasses.DataGridColumn and there
The same thing happens to :
mx.controls.advancedDataGridClasses.AdvancedDataGridColumn;
too.
-Gary
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Gary Yang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to upgrade a program to Flex 4.12.1, it has a error inside
> DataGrid.as:
>
> ReferenceError: Err
Hi,
I am trying to upgrade a program to Flex 4.12.1, it has a error inside
DataGrid.as:
ReferenceError: Error #1069: Property sortCompareType not found on
mx.controls.dataGridClasses.DataGridColumn and there is no default value.
at
mx.controls::DataGrid/sortByColumn()[/Users/aharui/flex-sdk
Spreading the word in Spain and LATAM! :)
2014-05-04 6:22 GMT+02:00 DarkStone :
> Congraturations!
>
> I've spread the word to China just now.
>
> Keep up the great works!
>
>
> DarkStone
> 2014-05-04
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.c
Do we have the right installer sctipt in 4.12.1 I'm getting all of the licence
messages refering to FlexJS like so:
"Apache FlexJS uses the Adobe AIR SDK to build Adobe AIR applications".
IMO only a minor issue from a legal point of view that's probably quite serious.
Were is t
Hi,
> OK, "ant -f installer.xml" exactly matches against what Installer 3.0 does.
Do we have the right installer sctipt in 4.12.1 I'm getting all of the licence
messages refering to FlexJS like so:
"Apache FlexJS uses the Adobe AIR SDK to build Adobe AIR applications&qu
w what the airsdk.xml file does? It isn't in the Flash
Builder 4.6.0 sdk. The javascript folder isn't there either.
-Alex
On 5/3/14 8:54 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>On 5/3/14 8:37 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>>HI,
>>
>>> No
Congraturations!
I've spread the word to China just now.
Keep up the great works!
DarkStone
2014-05-04
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-Apache-Flex-4-12-1-released-tp37444p37473.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing
On 5/3/14 8:37 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>HI,
>
>> Note that these are all bugs in Apache Flex 4.12.1 installer.xml, not in
>> InstallApacheFlex.
>
>Including it not clearing out the in directory? Does that mean we need to
>release a 4.12.2 (and quickly)?
HI,
> Note that these are all bugs in Apache Flex 4.12.1 installer.xml, not in
> InstallApacheFlex.
Including it not clearing out the in directory? Does that mean we need to
release a 4.12.2 (and quickly)?
What would need to be done to remove the installer script out of 4.12.1 so th
Note that these are all bugs in Apache Flex 4.12.1 installer.xml, not in
InstallApacheFlex.
On 5/3/14 5:33 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I just installed via both installer and did a diff:
>
>diff ApacheFlex4.12Installer3.0 ApacheFlex4.12installer2.7
>Only i
lex 4.12.1 FP13.0 AIR13.0 en_US
---
> Apache Flex 4.12.1 FP 13.0 AIR 13.0 en_US
Only in ApacheFlex4.12Installer3.0: in
Only in ApacheFlex4.12installer2.7: javascript
Only in ApacheFlex4.12Installer3.0: sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml
We may have a serious issue with the missing airsdk.xml file.
Missi
Thanks Alex of taking care of this release.
Maurice
De : Alex Harui [aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : samedi 3 mai 2014 07:39
À : us...@flex.apache.org; dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : [ANNOUNCE] Apache Flex 4.12.1 released
The Apache Flex community is pleased to
Hi,
I will spread the word in Poland.. :)
Thanks guys!
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-Apache-Flex-4-12-1-released-tp37444p37452.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Developmen
Posted on blog and website updated to reflect this release.
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache
> Flex 4.12.1
>
> Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source application framework for
&g
The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache
Flex 4.12.1
Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source application framework for
building and maintaining expressive applications that deploy consistently
on all major browsers, desktops and devices (including smartphones
Hi,
Looks good to me.
Thanks,
Justin
Maybe include a link to the release notes:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Apache+Flex+4.12.1+Release+Notes
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 2 mai 2014 18:59
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : [DRAFT] 4
Hi,
I'll send this out in about 12 hours or so. Do we need to announce on the
official Apache announce list?
-- start draft announcement --
The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache
Flex 4.12.1
Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source application fram
Here you are:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Apache+Flex+4.12.1+Release+Notes
Feel free to make additions/changes.
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 1 mai 2014 18:15
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] Di
When do you intend to make the announcement on 4.12.1, so you I can have the
wiki page ready ?
De : Alex Harui [aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 1 mai 2014 17:35
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache Flex 4.12.1 RC2
On 4/30/14 1:41
jeudi 1 mai 2014 18:08
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache Flex 4.12.1 RC2
>
>Working on it now. If your wiki page isn't ready right away I don't think
>it will matter that much.
>
>On 5/1/14 9:06 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote:
No, it won't. So go ahead
De : Alex Harui [aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 1 mai 2014 18:08
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache Flex 4.12.1 RC2
Working on it now. If your wiki page isn't ready right away I don'
Working on it now. If your wiki page isn't ready right away I don't think
it will matter that much.
On 5/1/14 9:06 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote:
>When do you intend to make the announcement on 4.12.1, so you I can have
>the wiki page ready ?
>___
dd a page (either in the web site or in the wiki) to
>>describe in detail the various features.
>>What do you think?
>>
>>Maurice
>>
>>On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This is a Apache Flex 4.12.1
suggest that we add a page (either in the web site or in the wiki) to
>describe in detail the various features.
>What do you think?
>
>Maurice
>
>On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a Apache Flex 4.12.1 release candidate
On 4/30/14 1:41 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote:
>(copied from wrong VOTE thread):
>
>One minor issue in the release notes:
>FLEX-33948 Add touch behaviour to spark DropDownList classes => the
>ticket is still open. implementation attempts were not satisfactory, and
>have not been committed.
I a
27;origine-
De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Envoyé : mardi 29 avril 2014 04:33
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache Flex 4.12.1 RC2
Hi,
> Is it possible that between 4.11 and 4.12 we switched from OSX Java 6
> to Java 7 and that caused this p
Hi,
+1 (binding)
Signatures all good
LICENCE, NOTICE, README etc all good
Can compile from source (with a couple of minor issues - see discussion)
Can make release (also has some minor issues)
XML config files are correct (if you do a ant release rather than just an ant)
compc/mxmlc report correc
understand what was
done isn't better.
I suggest that we add a page (either in the web site or in the wiki) to
describe in detail the various features.
What do you think?
Maurice
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a Apache Flex 4.12.1 r
Hi,
> Is it possible that between 4.11 and 4.12 we switched from OSX Java 6 to Java
> 7 and that caused this
> problem?
Possibly.
> IMO, this is not a blocker since folks have not noticed this with 4.12.
No didn't think it was a blocker - just an inconvenience when trying to make a
release.
Ju
+1 (binding)
Win7 64bit, player global 12.0, air 4.0, Java 7.
-Successful build of sdk from source.
-Successfully created small test application.
-Mark
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a Apache Flex 4.12.1 release candidate 2. Pleas
On 4/28/14 9:08 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>On 4/28/14 5:12 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>
>>Seems an obvious issue (ie compc not being executable) and probably
>>easily fixed, but also seems related to the issue I pointed out with RC1.
>>Has something changed since 4.12 permission wise?
>I'm
On 4/28/14 5:12 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Seems an obvious issue (ie compc not being executable) and probably
>easily fixed, but also seems related to the issue I pointed out with RC1.
>Has something changed since 4.12 permission wise?
I'm seeing this same issue with 4.12.0, but not with 4.1
On 4/28/14 1:16 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>
>What the list to changes between the two RCs? Just changes to the README
>and RELEASE_NOTE or have there been build/code changes?
In addition to the README/RELEASE_NOTE change, there is one asdoc change.
Didn't my original [DISCUSS] post include m
Hi,
I'm currently getting "ant -Dbuild.number=20140428 -Dbuild.noprompt= release" /
"ant release" failing.
compilemustellaswc:
BUILD FAILED
/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexSDK4.12.1RC2/apache-flex-sdk-4.12.1-src/build.xml:1440:
The following error occurred
Hi,
Obviously link in vote thread should be:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.12.1/rc2/
Not:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.12.1/rc1/
What the list to changes between the two RCs? Just changes to the README and
RELEASE_NOTE or have there been build/code
Hi,
This is a Apache Flex 4.12.1 release candidate 2. Please see the
RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
There is a known bug in Adobe Flash Builder 4.6 and 4.7 that causes a
issue when creating new applications.
Adobe has provided a work around for FB 4.7 but not for 4.6.
The release candidate can
This is the discussion thread.
If you are going to use the Installer to test the binaries, please use the
Installer 3.0 RC at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc7/binaries/
The only changes are in README and RELEASE_NOTES and one minor asdoc fix.
Thanks,
-Alex
Going to do an RC2 with updated/fixed README/RELEASE_NOTES
On 4/25/14 6:13 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>This is a Apache Flex 4.12.1 release candidate 1. Please see the
>RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
>
>There is a known bug in Adobe Flash Builder 4.6 and 4
Hi,
Changing vote to +0 (binding).
Justin
On 4/26/14 1:22 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Probably not an issue but I noticed that bin/compc and bin/mxmlc are
>>not executable after a build from source - but they probably should be.
>
>This causes "ant checkintests" to fail after compiling, once fixed, they
>still fail due to FP tru
Did this work in past releases?
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
Found a potential blocker. After running /ide/constructFlexForIDE.sh on a
compile SDK the flex config RSL version numbers are incorrect and have "0" for
the build number. I know
Hi,
-1 (binding) for now
Signatures + hashes good
README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE, LICENCE all OK (minor changes + a few missing
fixes can be put into RC2 if you think it's needed)
Can compile from source
ant checkintests pass (after manually made executable and flash file added to
trusted list)
Hi,
Found a potential blocker. After running /ide/constructFlexForIDE.sh on a
compile SDK the flex config RSL version numbers are incorrect and have "0" for
the build number. I know most people use the installer and won't encounter this
issue but probably indicates that something is amiss somew
Hi,
> Probably not an issue but I noticed that bin/compc and bin/mxmlc are not
> executable after a build from source - but they probably should be.
This causes "ant checkintests" to fail after compiling, once fixed, they still
fail due to FP trust issue - do we have this documented in the
rea
Hi,
Probably not an issue but I noticed that bin/compc and bin/mxmlc are not
executable after a build from source - but they probably should be.
Justin
HI,
I think FLEX-34013 may be missing from the release notes (or was the checkin
comment incorrect and it was meant to be FLEX-34231?).
Justin
Hi,
Not a big issue but not 100% sure what TLF fixes have gone into this release as
the TLF is missing a tag. TLF fixes FLEX-34098, FLEX-33985 and FLEX-33423 are
not mentioned in the release notes.
Justin
Hi,
There a few minor issues with README/RELEASE_NOTE and AIR/FP 13 support - but
certainly not blockers. I've updated and checked in for next RC if there is one.
Thanks,
Justin
Thanks Alex for this release
I will test it this week-end.
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 25 avril 2014 15:17
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.12.1 RC1
This is the discussion thread.
If you are
This is the discussion thread.
If you are going to use the Installer to test the binaries, please use the
Installer 3.0 RC at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc7/binaries/
Thanks,
-Alex
Hi,
This is a Apache Flex 4.12.1 release candidate 1. Please see the
RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
There is a known bug in Adobe Flash Builder 4.6 and 4.7 that causes a
issue when creating new applications.
Adobe has provided a work around for FB 4.7 but not for 4.6.
The release candidate can
>Is there anything else you want to get into 4.12.1?
I am working on the GC issue (FLEX-34230)
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : lundi 21 avril 2014 23:31
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: 4.12.1
OK, I'll look into it. I just
OK, I'll look into it. I just saw a commit from you. Is there anything
else you want to get into 4.12.1?
-Alex
On 4/21/14 2:21 PM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote:
>Yes, I intend to take over Lee on this ticket, but not soon.
>If someone else would like to work on it before I
: Re: 4.12.1
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33948 please
On 21/04/2014 08:02, Alex Harui wrote:
> I'm getting ready to try my hand at 4.12.1 release candidates. I will
> sync the develop branch into the release4.12.0 and build from there.
>
> Does anybody have anythi
Maurice, are you going to look at this again or do you need someone else
to take it?
-ALex
On 4/21/14 5:46 AM, "Lee Burrows" wrote:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33948 please
>
>On 21/04/2014 08:02, Alex Harui wrote:
>> I'm getting ready to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33948 please
On 21/04/2014 08:02, Alex Harui wrote:
I'm getting ready to try my hand at 4.12.1 release candidates. I will
sync the develop branch into the release4.12.0 and build from there.
Does anybody have anything they want to get in before
Yes, I did the fix but not committed yet, as I want to fix the GC issue as well
De : Alex Harui [aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : lundi 21 avril 2014 09:02
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: 4.12.1
I'm getting ready to try my hand at 4.12.1 release candi
I'm getting ready to try my hand at 4.12.1 release candidates. I will
sync the develop branch into the release4.12.0 and build from there.
Does anybody have anything they want to get in before I do this? Maurice
did you have one more stage text fix?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 4/10/14 11:44 PM, &qu
>I know Maurice sort of volunteered to the the RM, but maybe someone else
>should just cut an RC for 4.12.1.
Yes, I volunteered, but in the meantime, I got committed to a critical delivery
to be scheduled early May (that's why I am not very active on a.o at the
moment).
So if
On 4/10/14 10:43 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>> I think we should re-add the try/catch blocks as requested in FLEX-34218
>I rather not if we can avoid it as a) it has worse performance b)
>silently catches and throws away user errors.
OK, maybe you should respond to FLEX-34218 and see what the
ue?
> Whatever is in the repo is going to be 4.12.1.
> I think we should re-add the try/catch blocks as requested in FLEX-34218
I rather not if we can avoid it as a) it has worse performance b) silently
catches and throws away user errors.
> One question: I know you create a whole
On 4/10/14 4:56 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>> I can look at FLEX-34132 if you want.
>That's been fixed.
OK, I'm confused. I thought the list you provided was bugs that needed to
be fixed. Whatever is in the repo is going to be 4.12.1. I think we
shoul
two out there to support. And, its another cycle of voting.
Should require minimal changes == only one or two RCs I would hope.
> I'd say we fix these two and crank out a 4.12.1. If you can jam anything
> else in there feel free to do so.
Not going to have much time over the next week or
nstall a regular SDK
>You could release a version of the installer just for FlexJS. All that
>would be needed is a different config file right? I know the whole point
>was to decouple SDK/installer release cycles but it seems a less risky
>option to me and wouldn't require a 4.12.1
K/installer release cycles but it seems a less risky option to me and
wouldn't require a 4.12.1 release right?
> 2) what else do we want to fix in 4.12.1?
Here's a couple of important ones:
FLEX-34209 fix parsing of hours between 12pm and 1pm
FLEX-34132 stop "[object Object]
I'm hopeful we'll approve a FlexJS soon and folks wanting to use an
installer for FlexJS need to use InstallApacheFlex 3.0 which has enough
votes to release, but because it will cause a locale issue with 4.12.0,
we've agreed to delay officially releasing the Installer until 4.12.1
83 matches
Mail list logo
