OK, "ant -f installer.xml" exactly matches against what Installer 3.0 does.
I ran the 2.7 and 3.0 installer and actually got a few more differences on OSX. The bin/adt script was missing in 3.0. There was an extensions and sdk folder in templates in the 2.7 install. Does anybody know what the airsdk.xml file does? It isn't in the Flash Builder 4.6.0 sdk. The javascript folder isn't there either. -Alex On 5/3/14 8:54 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > >On 5/3/14 8:37 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > >>HI, >> >>> Note that these are all bugs in Apache Flex 4.12.1 installer.xml, not >>>in >>> InstallApacheFlex. >> >>Including it not clearing out the in directory? Does that mean we need to >>release a 4.12.2 (and quickly)? >Why is not removing the in directory a major problem? > >> >>What would need to be done to remove the installer script out of 4.12.1 >>so that we don't have this dependancy between the SDK and the installer? >The installer is just an execution engine like Apache Ant. It runs >whatever the 4.12.1 install script runs. It enables us to have one >installer for both Flex and FlexJS and eventually other packages. > >Actually, the next test to try is "ant -f installer.xml" on an expanded >bin kit. Thinking about this some more, it is a bit surprising that the >javascript folder was missing since I would think that it would appear as >part of the uncompressing of the binary package. > >Folks running "ant -f installer.xml" should also see the "in" folder left >behind and all of the other issues you brought up. I'll take a look. > >-Alex >
