On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> The files are in our svn in a branch. Are you saying some XML files were
> missing from the donation?
>
Yes, the missing aspx files, ex:
http://aspexamples.adobe.com/chart_examples/expenses.aspx
A cached version from 2012 is available here:
The files are in our svn in a branch. Are you saying some XML files were
missing from the donation?
-Alex
On 8/12/15, 12:01 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>Do we know what the status of this is?
>
>I have managed to find out data used in the Chart examples from
Do we know what the status of this is?
I have managed to find out data used in the Chart examples from the
web.archive.org backups. I have them on my local box as xml files. What
would be the next steps?
Thanks,
Om
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 4/29/15, 2:51 PM,
On 4/29/15, 2:51 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>I’ve been asked to supply a list of the ways Flash is used in the content
>and will supposedly receive a set of replacement phrases, so stay tuned.
OK, here’s the list. Of course, these may not all be there after Nick’s
edits. And if something isn’t
On 4/30/15, 5:54 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
>I image we can re-configure the applets to use .xml documents. From what
>I
>remember, 90% of them were calling web services anyway, so we should be
>able to get the same result.
OK. I know there is an employees.xml in the flex-external rep
I don't think it really offers us much advantage at the moment. Because of
the size of our site (mainly because of asdocs), it will add a lot of bloat
everytime we publish a new Flex version...
-Nick
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:56 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:07 AM,
I image we can re-configure the applets to use .xml documents. From what I
remember, 90% of them were calling web services anyway, so we should be
able to get the same result.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 4/27/15, 2:59 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
> >In my
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> It just occurred to me: I can create a branch in SVN right? Only trunk
> gets pub’d?
>
>
Just saw this notification:
https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/git_based_websites_available
Infra now supports git based website publication.
Thanks,
On 4/29/15, 2:44 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>HI,
>
>> Our legal folks currently do not see the cleaning up of terms like
>>“Flash
>> content” as a requirement before publication.
>
>Dos that mean they it needs to be done after publication or do they don't
>care at all?
Well, yes it needs to be
HI,
> Our legal folks currently do not see the cleaning up of terms like “Flash
> content” as a requirement before publication.
Dos that mean they it needs to be done after publication or do they don't care
at all?
Thanks,
Justin
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 4/27/15, 2:59 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
> >In my experience, I have seen a lot of them. I don't know if there is a
> >way to get an accurate count of how many.
> >
> >Of course, if you are not able to locate them, we would ha
On 4/28/15, 8:30 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>On 4/28/15, 1:03 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
Also according to [1] terms like "Flash application” and “Flash
content”
are not allowed to be used, which the content currently also uses.
>>>
>>> I’ll ask Adobe legal how important that
On 4/27/15, 2:59 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>In my experience, I have seen a lot of them. I don't know if there is a
>way to get an accurate count of how many.
>
>Of course, if you are not able to locate them, we would have to go update
>them anyways. But, if you are able to locate and
On 4/28/15, 1:03 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>>>Also according to [1] terms like "Flash application” and “Flash content”
>>> are not allowed to be used, which the content currently also uses.
>>
>> I’ll ask Adobe legal how important that is. For now I left "Adobe
>>Flash"
>> in the list on som
Hi,
>> Should be “LifeCycle":
>> grep "LIveCycle” ./content/doc/flex/using/*
>
> Didn’t understand this.
Very minor - the “I” should be a ”i”.
> I’ll leave these for someone else to determine if they can be replaced
> with Apache Flex. If any can’t be then we’ll add Adobe Flex to the list.
So
I just committed a bunch of updates to the trademark lists. Thanks Justin
for finding these.
On 4/27/15, 3:41 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>There’s still a couple of minor trademarks issue that need fixing up.
>
>grep "Nokia" ./content/doc/flex/using/*
I replaced Nokia with Flex just for
I think the product name of Adobes "BlazeDS Professional/Enterprise" is
LiveCycle
Chris
Von: Justin Mclean
Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. April 2015 00:41
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Hi,
There’s still a
Hi,
> I have a pile of mxml files that look like they are safe to commit. Where
> should they go? SVN or Git?
A good place for them would be Tour De Flex and (eventually) have the content
point to that.
Thanks,
Justin
I don’t know what is behind an asp site, but if it looks like code, it
will have to go through the donation process, I can’t just copy it over.
I’ll ask around, but even if there are dozens of apps and they all hit one
or two server calls, it will still be faster to adjust those dozen tests,
espec
Hi,
There’s still a couple of minor trademarks issue that need fixing up.
grep "Nokia" ./content/doc/flex/using/*
Should be “LifeCycle":
grep "LIveCycle” ./content/doc/flex/using/*
Perhaps these:
grep "Adobe Flex" ./content/doc/flex/using/*
grep “Blaze" ./content/doc/flex/using/*
Perhaps thes
In my experience, I have seen a lot of them. I don't know if there is a
way to get an accurate count of how many.
Of course, if you are not able to locate them, we would have to go update
them anyways. But, if you are able to locate and copy them over, it will
definitely save us a lot of time.
Unless there are a lot of them, it will probably take less time to replace
the data with local .xml files. Some of this stuff was created and
maintained by individuals and had no corporate backup.
-Alex
On 4/27/15, 2:47 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>Also, it looks like a lot of the running
Also, it looks like a lot of the running swf files load example content
from this server:
http://aspexamples.adobe.com
Ex: click on the "View Running Example" button in the bottom on this page:
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/WS2db454920e96a9e51e63e3d11c0bf6568f-7ffc.html
The swf file load
Infra confirmed that only trunk gets pub’d and I test I ran also seems to
prove that. I’ve put the files in the flexdocs branch
(site/branches/flexdocs).
After the .html files were signed off, someone on our docs team found a
folder of .mxml files that are supposedly the examples used in the .htm
You are correct. That would be the best way to go.
-Nick
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> It just occurred to me: I can create a branch in SVN right? Only trunk
> gets pub’d?
>
> -Alex
>
> On 4/27/15, 4:48 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
>
> >I've got a window to work
It just occurred to me: I can create a branch in SVN right? Only trunk
gets pub’d?
-Alex
On 4/27/15, 4:48 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
>I've got a window to work on it later this week. I had a project get put
>on hold so I'm pretty free Wednesday through Friday.
>
>I don't think there i
I've got a window to work on it later this week. I had a project get put
on hold so I'm pretty free Wednesday through Friday.
I don't think there is a good way to stop a single folder from being
published. I think if it's in the SVN, it's in. I want to open up a
ticket with INFRA to see if we c
Is there a good way to keep a folder from being published? What folder
should be put it in?
BTW, over on general@, Justin is expressing a concern about the wording of
the trademark attributions. I’m not sure I understand his concern, but I
guess I’ll hold off on the commit for a few more days un
I think it should go into the SVN, because ultimately that is where it will
end up. But we will need to do some fixing up before we push it live...
-Nick
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> This finally got officially recorded and reviewed by Apache. I’m ready to
> commit it
This finally got officially recorded and reviewed by Apache. I’m ready to
commit it to a repo, but which one? I was going to use flex-utilities,
but maybe it should go in a folder on our web site SVN?
BTW, Justin found in the IP review that there are a few other trademark
names used in lists of
Vote passed with:
11 +1 binding votes
2 +1 non-binding votes
After a few mixups, the Software Grant was finally recorded so we can
start on the IP clearance.
-Alex
On 3/16/15, 3:32 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote:
>+1
>
>On 13/03/15 19:58, Alex Harui wrote:
>> Looks like the process documents want
+1
On 13/03/15 19:58, Alex Harui wrote:
Looks like the process documents want an actual VOTE thread, so here it is:
Please vote to accept the Adobe donation of most of the content found here
[1]. Some images will be removed as well as the Adobe stuff you see
around the edges of the screen, but
+1 (binding)
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 3:59 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Looks like the process documents want an actual VOTE thread, so here it is:
Please vote to accept the Adobe
13.03.2015 21:59 пользователь "Alex Harui" написал:
>
> Looks like the process documents want an actual VOTE thread, so here it
is:
>
> Please vote to accept the Adobe donation of most of the content found here
> [1]. Some images will be removed as well as the Adobe stuff you see
> around the edg
+1 (binding)
Harbs
+1 Binding
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 19:58:42 +
>
> Looks like the process documents want an actual VOTE thread, so here it is:
>
> Please vote to accept the Adobe
+1 binding
On 13 Mar 2015 20:59, "Alex Harui" wrote:
> Looks like the process documents want an actual VOTE thread, so here it is:
>
> Please vote to accept the Adobe donation of most of the content found here
> [1]. Some images will be removed as well as the Adobe stuff you see
> around the edg
+1 Binding
2015-03-14 15:08 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz :
> +1 binding
>
>
> Von: Margo Powell
> Gesendet: Samstag, 14. März 2015 12:46
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: RE: [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
>
> +1
>
> >
+1 binding
Von: Margo Powell
Gesendet: Samstag, 14. März 2015 12:46
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: RE: [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
+1
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2
+1
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 19:58:42 +
>
> Looks like the process documents want an actual VOTE thread, so here it is:
>
> Please vote to accept the Adobe donation of most of the
+1 binding
+1
On Friday, March 13, 2015, Jeffry Houser wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
>
> --
> Jeffry Houser
> Technical Entrepreneur
> http://www.jeffryhouser.com
> 203-379-0773
>
>
+1
--
Jeffry Houser
Technical Entrepreneur
http://www.jeffryhouser.com
203-379-0773
+1 (Binding)
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Looks like the process documents want an actual VOTE thread, so here it is:
>
> Please vote to accept the Adobe donation of most of the content found here
> [1]. Some images will be removed as well as the Adobe stuff you see
> ar
Looks like the process documents want an actual VOTE thread, so here it is:
Please vote to accept the Adobe donation of most of the content found here
[1]. Some images will be removed as well as the Adobe stuff you see
around the edges of the screen, but essentially, the text content will be
dona
45 matches
Mail list logo
