On 4/28/15, 8:30 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >On 4/28/15, 1:03 AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > >>>>Also according to [1] terms like "Flash application” and “Flash >>>>content” >>>> are not allowed to be used, which the content currently also uses. >>> >>> I’ll ask Adobe legal how important that is. For now I left "Adobe >>>Flash" >>> in the list on some pages. >> >I’ve asked Adobe Legal to see how important it is to fix these issues >before publication. If you want to start in on it, please coordinate with >Nick. This is SVN and having two people edit the file can cause merge >hell. I’d rather get something published for our community sooner and fix >things that can wait later. Our legal folks currently do not see the cleaning up of terms like “Flash content” as a requirement before publication. -Alex
