I just committed a bunch of updates to the trademark lists. Thanks Justin for finding these.
On 4/27/15, 3:41 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >There’s still a couple of minor trademarks issue that need fixing up. > >grep "Nokia" ./content/doc/flex/using/* I replaced Nokia with Flex just for now. We can’t use the images anyway so Nick or someone will have to cook up a modified example. > >Should be “LifeCycle": >grep "LIveCycle” ./content/doc/flex/using/* Didn’t understand this. > > >Perhaps these: >grep "Adobe Flex" ./content/doc/flex/using/* I’ll leave these for someone else to determine if they can be replaced with Apache Flex. If any can’t be then we’ll add Adobe Flex to the list. >grep “Blaze" ./content/doc/flex/using/* > >Perhaps these as well: >grep “Flash Platform" ./content/doc/flex/using/* >grep “Flash Player" ./content/doc/flex/using/* Added all three. > >I’m not 100% how they need to be handled. [1] probably contains the >answer. > >Also according to [1] terms like "Flash application” and “Flash content” >are not allowed to be used, which the content currently also uses. I’ll ask Adobe legal how important that is. For now I left "Adobe Flash" in the list on some pages. > >I’d also like to point out that the trademark attribution is non standard >and contains an extra bit "No other license to the Adobe trademarks are >granted.” The result of which is that we need to be careful when editing >the trademarks and may in fact require permission from Adobe in order to >do so. That may not be the correct interpretation. Since I have to ask Legal about the usage of “Flash content” etc, I’ll ask for a clarification on this attribution. -Alex > >1. >http://wwwimages.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/legal/documents/Flash_Trad >emark_Guidelines_3rd_Party_2014.pdf
