[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Flex FalconJX 0.0.1 RC4

2014-04-21 Thread Alex Harui
Vote passes with 3 +1 votes, no 0 votes and no -1 votes. On 4/21/14 10:33 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >+1 (binding) > >Sigs ok >Builds ok. >Can be used in FlexJS builds > >Definitely agree this is the bare minimum to go public with. Still lots >of work to get to 1.0. > >-Alex > >On 4/20/14 10:45 PM

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex FalconJX 0.0.1 RC4

2014-04-21 Thread Alex Harui
+1 (binding) Sigs ok Builds ok. Can be used in FlexJS builds Definitely agree this is the bare minimum to go public with. Still lots of work to get to 1.0. -Alex On 4/20/14 10:45 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >+1 (binding) > >- sigs good >- docs meager, but seem OK >- 'ant all' target completes

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex FalconJX 0.0.1 RC4

2014-04-20 Thread Erik de Bruin
+1 (binding) - sigs good - docs meager, but seem OK - 'ant all' target completes successfully (i.e. source builds and all tests pass) I'll go with Justin on this one and add that these aren't release quality bits, but I think it is a good move to release early and (hopefully) often, getting this

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex FalconJX 0.0.1 RC4

2014-04-20 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) NOTICE, LICENCE, RELEASE_NOTE all OK (minor formatting/line length issues) checksum/sigs good rat report good can compile from source unit tests pass can use mxmlc and compc without error however can't use compiler.jx compc and mxmlc was (eventually) able to test compiler.jx wit

[VOTE] Apache Flex FalconJX 0.0.1 RC4

2014-04-18 Thread Alex Harui
Hi, This is vote for the initial (0.0.1) release of the FalconJX (and Falcon) compilers. I am not proposing a separate Falcon-only release package at this time. The only purpose of the FalconJX packages are to serve as upstream packages for the FlexJS release. The release candidate can be found