Vote passes with 3 +1 votes, no 0 votes and no -1 votes. On 4/21/14 10:33 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>+1 (binding) > >Sigs ok >Builds ok. >Can be used in FlexJS builds > >Definitely agree this is the bare minimum to go public with. Still lots >of work to get to 1.0. > >-Alex > >On 4/20/14 10:45 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > >>+1 (binding) >> >>- sigs good >>- docs meager, but seem OK >>- 'ant all' target completes successfully (i.e. source builds and all >>tests >>pass) >> >>I'll go with Justin on this one and add that these aren't release quality >>bits, but I think it is a good move to release early and (hopefully) >>often, >>getting this new framework to where the wild things live ;-) >> >>EdB >> >> >> >>On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Justin Mclean >><jus...@classsoftware.com>wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> NOTICE, LICENCE, RELEASE_NOTE all OK (minor formatting/line length >>>issues) >>> checksum/sigs good >>> rat report good >>> can compile from source >>> unit tests pass >>> can use mxmlc and compc without error however can't use compiler.jx >>>compc >>> and mxmlc >>> was (eventually) able to test compiler.jx with upstream FlexJS package >>> >>> Note if this wasn't an alpha I wouldn't vote +1 >>> - documentation needs some work >>> - compiler.jx compc and mxmlc don't work out of the box >>> - relies on a upstream package to correctly test and not all >>> tests/examples are working >>> >>> Tested on OSX. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Justin >> >> >> >> >>-- >>Ix Multimedia Software >> >>Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>3521 VB Utrecht >> >>T. 06-51952295 >>I. www.ixsoftware.nl >
