+1 (binding) Sigs ok Builds ok. Can be used in FlexJS builds
Definitely agree this is the bare minimum to go public with. Still lots of work to get to 1.0. -Alex On 4/20/14 10:45 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >+1 (binding) > >- sigs good >- docs meager, but seem OK >- 'ant all' target completes successfully (i.e. source builds and all >tests >pass) > >I'll go with Justin on this one and add that these aren't release quality >bits, but I think it is a good move to release early and (hopefully) >often, >getting this new framework to where the wild things live ;-) > >EdB > > > >On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Justin Mclean ><jus...@classsoftware.com>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> NOTICE, LICENCE, RELEASE_NOTE all OK (minor formatting/line length >>issues) >> checksum/sigs good >> rat report good >> can compile from source >> unit tests pass >> can use mxmlc and compc without error however can't use compiler.jx >>compc >> and mxmlc >> was (eventually) able to test compiler.jx with upstream FlexJS package >> >> Note if this wasn't an alpha I wouldn't vote +1 >> - documentation needs some work >> - compiler.jx compc and mxmlc don't work out of the box >> - relies on a upstream package to correctly test and not all >> tests/examples are working >> >> Tested on OSX. >> >> Thanks, >> Justin > > > > >-- >Ix Multimedia Software > >Jan Luykenstraat 27 >3521 VB Utrecht > >T. 06-51952295 >I. www.ixsoftware.nl
