Re: [FlexJS] jsc doesn't follow typical compiler naming convention...

2015-08-20 Thread Michael Schmalle
As much as I hate hyphens, to me we are dealing with a cross compiler from one language to anther. I would vote for; as-jsc mxml-jsc read as ActionScript To JavaScript compiler MXML To JavaScript compiler Mike On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 8/20/15, 11:28 AM, "

Re: [FlexJS] jsc doesn't follow typical compiler naming convention...

2015-08-20 Thread Alex Harui
On 8/20/15, 11:28 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote: >On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Alex Harui wrote: >> Interesting, I thought you didn’t want it to start with “js" and that it >should start with “as” instead given the input is “as”. >> So the pattern there is "c" > >The most important point for m

Re: [FlexJS] jsc doesn't follow typical compiler naming convention...

2015-08-20 Thread Josh Tynjala
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Interesting, I thought you didn’t want it to start with “js" and that it should start with “as” instead given the input is “as”. > So the pattern there is "c" The most important point for me is including "as" or "mxml" in the name, which isn't

Re: [FlexJS] jsc doesn't follow typical compiler naming convention...

2015-08-20 Thread Alex Harui
On 8/20/15, 9:19 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote: >These are pretty straightforward options: > >js-mxmlc >jsmxmlc > >I'd lean more towards the version with the dash in the name, if we >consider >that we also have a jqueryc to rename. I think jquery-mxmlc is easier to >read than jquerymxmlc. Interesting

[FlexJS] jsc doesn't follow typical compiler naming convention...

2015-08-20 Thread Erik de Bruin
I would prefer left to right naming: source to target: mxml-jsc, as-jsc, etc. EdB On Thursday, August 20, 2015, Josh Tynjala > wrote: > These are pretty straightforward options: > > js-mxmlc > jsmxmlc > > I'd lean more towards the version with the dash in the name, if we consider > that we al

Re: [FlexJS] jsc doesn't follow typical compiler naming convention...

2015-08-20 Thread Josh Tynjala
These are pretty straightforward options: js-mxmlc jsmxmlc I'd lean more towards the version with the dash in the name, if we consider that we also have a jqueryc to rename. I think jquery-mxmlc is easier to read than jquerymxmlc. In the future, I would also hope to see node-mxmlc for NodeJS. D

Re: [FlexJS] jsc doesn't follow typical compiler naming convention...

2015-08-19 Thread Alex Harui
On 8/19/15, 4:27 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote: >Typically, the name of a compiler comes from the language it compiles into >something else. > >asc = ActionScript compiler >mxmlc = MXML Compiler >tsc = TypeScript Compiler >csc = C Sharp Compiler > >jsc doesn't follow that convention. Instead, it's n

[FlexJS] jsc doesn't follow typical compiler naming convention...

2015-08-19 Thread Josh Tynjala
Typically, the name of a compiler comes from the language it compiles into something else. asc = ActionScript compiler mxmlc = MXML Compiler tsc = TypeScript Compiler csc = C Sharp Compiler jsc doesn't follow that convention. Instead, it's named after its output format, with no mention of its inp