These are pretty straightforward options: js-mxmlc jsmxmlc
I'd lean more towards the version with the dash in the name, if we consider that we also have a jqueryc to rename. I think jquery-mxmlc is easier to read than jquerymxmlc. In the future, I would also hope to see node-mxmlc for NodeJS. Does MXML work with this output type? If not, then maybe using asc in the name would be better: js-asc jsasc - Josh On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 8/19/15, 4:27 PM, "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Typically, the name of a compiler comes from the language it compiles into > >something else. > > > >asc = ActionScript compiler > >mxmlc = MXML Compiler > >tsc = TypeScript Compiler > >csc = C Sharp Compiler > > > >jsc doesn't follow that convention. Instead, it's named after its output > >format, with no mention of its input language. With this name, many > >developers might expect it to compile JavaScript into something else. > > > >Should it be renamed? > > I’m open to renaming just about every name the code base. Suggest some > names. > > -Alex > >
