On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > Interesting, I thought you didn’t want it to start with “js" and that it should start with “as” instead given the input is “as”. > So the pattern there is "<input><output>c"
The most important point for me is including "as" or "mxml" in the name, which isn't there right now. The order of the input and output formats can be debated, I guess. I feel that the input language should be immediately before the "c". If jsasc doesn't look like it's in the correct order to some people, then I propose ascjs so that the "as" and the "c" are not split apart (or mxmlcjs). Ultimately, though, I'd be willing to accept asjsc or mxmljsc, if everyone thinks that's better. All I strongly care about is that "as" or "mxml" appears in the name. - Josh
