On 5/6/16, 3:07 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>3) Do we know of any other Maven-built code bases that use conditional
>compilation and offer slightly different APIs for downstream modules?
>
>I don't know of any, but I do know projects that produce different output
>from the same input ... if y
Just adding some two cents on the other side. We do not use Maven for our
internal production. We have exclusively private intranets for our development
environments that do not have internet access. We have our own build
mechanisms in place internally which function better than kludging
ee
ya ... well really hope Alex will make the trip on Wednesday.
Von: Alex Harui
Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Mai 2016 16:51:13
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon
On 5/6/16, 2:07 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com
On 5/6/16, 2:07 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>2016-05-06 9:41 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
>
>> which is why I'd rather not spend time right now trying to
>> make Maven build a SWC that our end-user customers won't need.
>>
>
>If I talk as a customer, I would say th
ed to be done. I am willing to work
on this, but I'm not willing to work on this all on my own and I'm not willing
to waste my time in continuing to support sloppy design work.
Chris
____________
Von: Alex Harui
Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Mai 2016 09:16:53
An: dev@
2016-05-06 9:41 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
> which is why I'd rather not spend time right now trying to
> make Maven build a SWC that our end-user customers won't need.
>
If I talk as a customer, I would say that my company could never adopt a
technology that it's not maven driven, since all our prod
2016-05-06 9:16 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
> Why put the entire project on hold? Don't people also want to
> know if we can shim the MX and Spark libraries?
>
> -Alex
>
>
MX and Spark is, for me, the viewable thing that could make people get
interest (all eye candy things has that attraction power
>
>5) Why not use Ant for the things that are hard and Maven for the rest?
>
>This way we have to configure two build systems. And it doesn't make us
>think twice about design decisions. If our first thought doesn't work
>with maven we do it with Ant. Anyway it wouldn't solve the root problem:
>Th
On 5/5/16, 11:28 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>2016-05-06 2:24 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
>
>>
>> I'm totally in favor of having Maven artifacts. I don't understand the
>> "all-Maven-for-every-build-step or nothing" attitude. So what if we use
>> Ant for some of
On 5/5/16, 5:36 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>>
>> I'm totally in favor of having Maven artifacts. I don't understand the
>> "all-Maven-for-every-build-step or nothing" attitude. So what if we use
>> Ant fo
standard build, that
follows some standard rules instead of with the current solution ... and ...
Adobe promised to support us for 5 years by paying someone to continue working
on Flex ... so how much time do we have left?
Ufff ... think I'm through with it :-)
I think I'll sketch my v
2016-05-06 2:24 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
>
> I'm totally in favor of having Maven artifacts. I don't understand the
> "all-Maven-for-every-build-step or nothing" attitude. So what if we use
> Ant for some of it?
>
> -Alex
>
>
Alex, cause is the nature of maven...is all or nothing. Embrace it or le
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 5/5/16, 1:36 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> wrote:
> >
> >For multiple targets, I think it should be possible by using different pom
> >files for different targets. You could have a parent pom that calls thes
On 5/5/16, 1:36 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>
>For multiple targets, I think it should be possible by using different pom
>files for different targets. You could have a parent pom that calls these
>two poms if you want to chain them together.
Sounds possible
;as soon as you try to build something that relies on "Core". In order to
>>finish this, we need to clean this mess up and that's where I'm stuck,
>>cause I cant do this without breaking things.
>>
>> Chris
>> ____
&
a
>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2016 21:00:23
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Christofer Dutz
> wrote:
>
>> To me it feels like I'm the only one actually wanting to go to M
ftrag von OmPrakash Muppirala
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2016 21:00:23
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> To me it feels like I'm the only one actually wanting to go to Maven :-(
>
;2016-05-05 12:32 GMT+02:00 Christofer Dutz :
> >
> >> To me it feels like I'm the only one actually wanting to go to Maven :-(
> >>
> >> I'm even thinking about dropping the ball on this entirely, cause I
> >>don't
> >> want to be the onl
2016-05-05 20:24 GMT+02:00 Josh Tynjala :
> but if it means that onboarding new
> contributors (including those who have never used Maven before) is quick
> and easy,
The pain is to get to the maven setup done. Once in that state, it's so
easy to contribute, since you only have to be worried ab
>
> Ursprüngliche Nachricht
> Von: Harbs
> Datum: 05.05.16 11:54 (GMT+01:00)
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon
>
> Got it.
>
> Once you have the Maven build working, it would be great to see what it
as I don't hear a meaningful number of others stepping up ...
> > I'll step down and start living a life again ... far too many friends I
> > didn't have a beer with cause I was working on Flex, far to many days my
> > girlfriend was mad at me, cause I sat at the com
at at the computer the whole day trying
> to get this one thing finished.
>
> I'm sick of it and so I'll check where to put a sensible amount of effort
> into other projects at ApacheCon.
>
> Chris
>
>
> Von: Alex Harui
> G
shed.
>
> I'm sick of it and so I'll check where to put a sensible amount of effort
> into other projects at ApacheCon.
>
> Chris
>
>
> Von: Alex Harui
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2016 18:22:26
> An: dev@flex.apac
lfriend was mad
at me, cause I sat at the computer the whole day trying to get this one thing
finished.
I'm sick of it and so I'll check where to put a sensible amount of effort into
other projects at ApacheCon.
Chris
____________
Von: Alex Harui
Ges
ryone is happy with Ant and it's the overall
>>impression
>> I'm making things more complicated with Maven, I better invest my time
>>in
>> other projects.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>> Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
>>
>>
up making this
trivial, I think the community will indeed benefit.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FALCON-Code-analysis-stats-for-Falcon-tp52793p52805.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Most if the critical and blocker issues are related to null pointer safety.
Chris
Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Alex Harui
Datum: 05.05.16 17:07 (GMT+01:00)
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for
On 5/5/16, 1:35 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>I just turned on public access to my SonarQube server ... there you can
>see an up-to-date code analysis report for Falcon and FalconJX. It
>clearly points out the Null Pointer hot spots.
>
>
>http://dev.c-ware.de:1/overview?id=2471
>
>
th Maven, I better invest my time in
> other projects.
>
> Chris
>
>
> Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
>
>
> Ursprüngliche Nachricht
> Von: Harbs
> Datum: 05.05.16 11:54 (GMT+01:00)
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [FALCO
pression
> I'm making things more complicated with Maven, I better invest my time in
> other projects.
>
> Chris
>
>
> Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
>
>
> Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----
> Von: Harbs
> Datum: 05.05.16 11:54 (GMT+01:0
ung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Harbs
Datum: 05.05.16 11:54 (GMT+01:00)
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon
Got it.
Once you have the Maven build working, it would be great to see what it does
with asjs. W
n: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon
>
> Wow. That’s really nice. Seems like it’s very useful!
>
> Does this only work for Java, or can it be configured for other languages
> (such as ActionScript)?
>
> Harbs
>
> On May 5
Datum: 05.05.16 11:02 (GMT+01:00)
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon
Wow. That’s really nice. Seems like it’s very useful!
Does this only work for Java, or can it be configured for other languages (such
as ActionScript)?
Harbs
On May 5, 2016, at 11:35 AM
Wow. That’s really nice. Seems like it’s very useful!
Does this only work for Java, or can it be configured for other languages (such
as ActionScript)?
Harbs
On May 5, 2016, at 11:35 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I just turned on public access to my SonarQube server ... there you c
Hi,
> I just turned on public access to my SonarQube server …
Nice! Do you know if we can generate/host this at Apache?
Your’ve also given me another slide for one of my talks at ApacheCon - I owe
you a beer.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
I just turned on public access to my SonarQube server ... there you can see an
up-to-date code analysis report for Falcon and FalconJX. It clearly points out
the Null Pointer hot spots.
http://dev.c-ware.de:1/overview?id=2471
Perhaps looking into this every now and then could help i
36 matches
Mail list logo