Re: AW: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-06 Thread Alex Harui
On 5/6/16, 3:07 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: > >3) Do we know of any other Maven-built code bases that use conditional >compilation and offer slightly different APIs for downstream modules? > >I don't know of any, but I do know projects that produce different output >from the same input ... if y

RE: Re: AW: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-06 Thread Kessler CTR Mark J
Just adding some two cents on the other side. We do not use Maven for our internal production. We have exclusively private intranets for our development environments that do not have internet access. We have our own build mechanisms in place internally which function better than kludging

AW: AW: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-06 Thread Christofer Dutz
ee ya ... well really hope Alex will make the trip on Wednesday. Von: Alex Harui Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Mai 2016 16:51:13 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon On 5/6/16, 2:07 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com

Re: AW: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-06 Thread Alex Harui
On 5/6/16, 2:07 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" wrote: >2016-05-06 9:41 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > >> which is why I'd rather not spend time right now trying to >> make Maven build a SWC that our end-user customers won't need. >> > >If I talk as a customer, I would say th

AW: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-06 Thread Christofer Dutz
ed to be done. I am willing to work on this, but I'm not willing to work on this all on my own and I'm not willing to waste my time in continuing to support sloppy design work. Chris ____________ Von: Alex Harui Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Mai 2016 09:16:53 An: dev@

Re: AW: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-06 Thread Carlos Rovira
2016-05-06 9:41 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > which is why I'd rather not spend time right now trying to > make Maven build a SWC that our end-user customers won't need. > If I talk as a customer, I would say that my company could never adopt a technology that it's not maven driven, since all our prod

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-06 Thread Carlos Rovira
2016-05-06 9:16 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > Why put the entire project on hold? Don't people also want to > know if we can shim the MX and Spark libraries? > > -Alex > > MX and Spark is, for me, the viewable thing that could make people get interest (all eye candy things has that attraction power

Re: AW: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-06 Thread Alex Harui
> >5) Why not use Ant for the things that are hard and Maven for the rest? > >This way we have to configure two build systems. And it doesn't make us >think twice about design decisions. If our first thought doesn't work >with maven we do it with Ant. Anyway it wouldn't solve the root problem: >Th

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-06 Thread Alex Harui
On 5/5/16, 11:28 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" wrote: >2016-05-06 2:24 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > >> >> I'm totally in favor of having Maven artifacts. I don't understand the >> "all-Maven-for-every-build-step or nothing" attitude. So what if we use >> Ant for some of

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Alex Harui
On 5/5/16, 5:36 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Alex Harui wrote: >> >> I'm totally in favor of having Maven artifacts. I don't understand the >> "all-Maven-for-every-build-step or nothing" attitude. So what if we use >> Ant fo

AW: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Christofer Dutz
standard build, that follows some standard rules instead of with the current solution ... and ... Adobe promised to support us for 5 years by paying someone to continue working on Flex ... so how much time do we have left? Ufff ... think I'm through with it :-) I think I'll sketch my v

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Carlos Rovira
2016-05-06 2:24 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > > I'm totally in favor of having Maven artifacts. I don't understand the > "all-Maven-for-every-build-step or nothing" attitude. So what if we use > Ant for some of it? > > -Alex > > Alex, cause is the nature of maven...is all or nothing. Embrace it or le

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 5/5/16, 1:36 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > wrote: > > > >For multiple targets, I think it should be possible by using different pom > >files for different targets. You could have a parent pom that calls thes

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Alex Harui
On 5/5/16, 1:36 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: > >For multiple targets, I think it should be possible by using different pom >files for different targets. You could have a parent pom that calls these >two poms if you want to chain them together. Sounds possible

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Alex Harui
;as soon as you try to build something that relies on "Core". In order to >>finish this, we need to clean this mess up and that's where I'm stuck, >>cause I cant do this without breaking things. >> >> Chris >> ____ &

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Harbs
a > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2016 21:00:23 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon > > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Christofer Dutz > wrote: > >> To me it feels like I'm the only one actually wanting to go to M

AW: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Christofer Dutz
ftrag von OmPrakash Muppirala Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2016 21:00:23 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > To me it feels like I'm the only one actually wanting to go to Maven :-( >

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
;2016-05-05 12:32 GMT+02:00 Christofer Dutz : > > > >> To me it feels like I'm the only one actually wanting to go to Maven :-( > >> > >> I'm even thinking about dropping the ball on this entirely, cause I > >>don't > >> want to be the onl

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Carlos Rovira
2016-05-05 20:24 GMT+02:00 Josh Tynjala : > but if it means that onboarding new > contributors (including those who have never used Maven before) is quick > and easy, The pain is to get to the maven setup done. Once in that state, it's so easy to contribute, since you only have to be worried ab

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
> > Ursprüngliche Nachricht > Von: Harbs > Datum: 05.05.16 11:54 (GMT+01:00) > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon > > Got it. > > Once you have the Maven build working, it would be great to see what it

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Josh Tynjala
as I don't hear a meaningful number of others stepping up ... > > I'll step down and start living a life again ... far too many friends I > > didn't have a beer with cause I was working on Flex, far to many days my > > girlfriend was mad at me, cause I sat at the com

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Carlos Rovira
at at the computer the whole day trying > to get this one thing finished. > > I'm sick of it and so I'll check where to put a sensible amount of effort > into other projects at ApacheCon. > > Chris > > > Von: Alex Harui > G

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Josh Tynjala
shed. > > I'm sick of it and so I'll check where to put a sensible amount of effort > into other projects at ApacheCon. > > Chris > > > Von: Alex Harui > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2016 18:22:26 > An: dev@flex.apac

AW: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Christofer Dutz
lfriend was mad at me, cause I sat at the computer the whole day trying to get this one thing finished. I'm sick of it and so I'll check where to put a sensible amount of effort into other projects at ApacheCon. Chris ____________ Von: Alex Harui Ges

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Alex Harui
ryone is happy with Ant and it's the overall >>impression >> I'm making things more complicated with Maven, I better invest my time >>in >> other projects. >> >> Chris >> >> >> Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. >> >>

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread yishayw
up making this trivial, I think the community will indeed benefit. -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FALCON-Code-analysis-stats-for-Falcon-tp52793p52805.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

AW: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Christofer Dutz
Most if the critical and blocker issues are related to null pointer safety. Chris Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Alex Harui Datum: 05.05.16 17:07 (GMT+01:00) An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Alex Harui
On 5/5/16, 1:35 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Hi, > > >I just turned on public access to my SonarQube server ... there you can >see an up-to-date code analysis report for Falcon and FalconJX. It >clearly points out the Null Pointer hot spots. > > >http://dev.c-ware.de:1/overview?id=2471 > >

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Harbs
th Maven, I better invest my time in > other projects. > > Chris > > > Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. > > > Ursprüngliche Nachricht > Von: Harbs > Datum: 05.05.16 11:54 (GMT+01:00) > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [FALCO

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Carlos Rovira
pression > I'm making things more complicated with Maven, I better invest my time in > other projects. > > Chris > > > Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. > > > Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---- > Von: Harbs > Datum: 05.05.16 11:54 (GMT+01:0

AW: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Christofer Dutz
ung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Harbs Datum: 05.05.16 11:54 (GMT+01:00) An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon Got it. Once you have the Maven build working, it would be great to see what it does with asjs. W

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Harbs
n: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon > > Wow. That’s really nice. Seems like it’s very useful! > > Does this only work for Java, or can it be configured for other languages > (such as ActionScript)? > > Harbs > > On May 5

AW: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Christofer Dutz
Datum: 05.05.16 11:02 (GMT+01:00) An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon Wow. That’s really nice. Seems like it’s very useful! Does this only work for Java, or can it be configured for other languages (such as ActionScript)? Harbs On May 5, 2016, at 11:35 AM

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Harbs
Wow. That’s really nice. Seems like it’s very useful! Does this only work for Java, or can it be configured for other languages (such as ActionScript)? Harbs On May 5, 2016, at 11:35 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi, > > > I just turned on public access to my SonarQube server ... there you c

Re: [FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I just turned on public access to my SonarQube server … Nice! Do you know if we can generate/host this at Apache? Your’ve also given me another slide for one of my talks at ApacheCon - I owe you a beer. Thanks, Justin

[FALCON] Code analysis stats for Falcon

2016-05-05 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi, I just turned on public access to my SonarQube server ... there you can see an up-to-date code analysis report for Falcon and FalconJX. It clearly points out the Null Pointer hot spots. http://dev.c-ware.de:1/overview?id=2471 Perhaps looking into this every now and then could help i