Hi,
That is a problem, but for Royale, we should stop requiring the flex-sdk
> repo and just use Apache Flex release bits.
>
For now, it's way easier to simply make the code run and let devs get set
up with a workable Royale SDK by following the steps in the READme.
And since this is a Flex issu
.swc?format=raw
I hesitate to change the URL in the build script as I don't know if it
changed at sourceforge or if the link in the script is a workaround for
e.g. a redirect at the source when running on the command line?
Thanks,
EdB
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
Hi,
When I run 'ant' on a fresh copy of the Flex SDK repo, I get the following
error:
[error]
download-osmf-swc:
[get] Getting:
https://sourceforge.net/adobe/flexsdk/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/frameworks/libs/OSMF2_0.swc?format=raw
[get] To: /Users/erik/Desktop/royale/flex-sdk/in/osmf.swc
How about the mailing lists?
EdB
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Alex Harui
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Looks like the new Royale repos have been created, so I think we need to
> switch over to those repos and not make more commits to flex-asjs,
> flex-typedefs, and flex-falcon.
>
> Thanks,
> -Al
>
> [...] I’d definitely like to see if we could migrate the content
> afterwards.
>
Dogfooding. Yeah!
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
t; > >>>>>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fissues.a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> pache.org <http://pache.org/>%2Fjira%
> > 2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15141&data=02%7C01%7C%
> > >>>>>>>&g
fy with Trademarks@. At the worst it will have to redirect
> to
> > >royale.apache.org, so I don't think you have to wait. It would be nice
> > to
> > >have that domain no matter what.
> > >
> > >-Alex
> > >
>
be we should know first what's the final price and see open a
> >>thread
> >> > >for
> >> > >it asking the community for some little donation. Of course I suppose
> >> that
> >> > >the rest of years will be down to a normal price
or, slightly better, royale.rocks, again for $12
EdB
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> We can also be '4chan cool' and get roy4le.com for only $12, which I'll
> gladly donate :-)
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10
We can also be '4chan cool' and get roy4le.com for only $12, which I'll
gladly donate :-)
EdB
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Piotr Zarzycki
wrote:
> If more people would like to give some we may have that royale.io. :)
>
> 2017-09-22 10:50 GMT+02:00 Erik de Brui
; >
> > What do you think?
> >
> >
> >
> > 2017-09-22 9:30 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
> >
> > > Erik,
> > >
> > > If it is connected (royale.as) to something majestic it is even
> better.
> > :)
> > >
> > > P
Ds will be the ones with exotic
extensions (.group, .zone, etc.) or where we 'pad' the name: royalesdk.org,
royaleframework.net, etc.)
EdB
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:27 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> I'll give it a look my tomorrow morning.
>
> EdB
>
>
>
>
I'll give it a look my tomorrow morning.
EdB
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:17 AM, Carlos Rovira
wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> I just have the WP installation running as a subdomain here:
>
> http://royale.codeoscopic.com
>
> I will working privately inside until I have something to show in the
> mailing
>
> Maybe we should have discussion whether we need Jira for new project?
> Maybe we should use Github only?
>
That sound like a plan. KISS [1] all the way ;-)
EdB
1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295 <
> I think if we grab a domain and donate it to the ASF, that it can't be
> hosted on non-ASF hardware. That would need to be verified.
> Maybe it would be better for the Royale PMC to approve Royale.xx as a
> third-party domain under Carlos's control. I think that's allowed. The
> policy [1] say
>
> * Domain: We must find a good and simple domain for Royale. I think if we
> can find something short like "royale.XXX" would be great over
> "apacheroyale.XXX".
>
.com, .org, .net, .io etc. all seem to be either in use or squatted upon.
Am I forgetting memorable TLP extensions? I assume we don
What is this FlexJS you are talking about? I sound a lot like this "Royale"
thing I'm hearing a lot about recently... Is it similar?
:-P
EdB
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Harbs wrote:
> We are currently in a “partner preview” of our FlexJS application and
> getting feedback from partners
Isn't it about time to reduce the number of names we're considering, not
think of more? With the VOTE already running and such...
EdB
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:13 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> Gah
> https://helix.apache.org/ is already taken :-((
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Dave
>
> > You should do this on the VOTE thread.
>
> This is the VOTE thread. At least that is what my gmail thinks it is...
>
My Gmail agrees ;-)
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
I'm changing my vote to:
1) Limb(e)r
2) Bead(s)
3) Braid
Sorry for any confusion.
EdB
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui
wrote:
> What a dilemma!
>
> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions. I haven't voted yet. I wanted to
> see what the trend was first.
>
> If you assign 3 points
Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
EdB
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went before
> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
>
> My new favorite is Limber, but
I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went before
it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can break
a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes, right?)
EdB
On Tue, Sep 19, 201
t; > > popular ones to vote. I think if we put ten options we'll end with a
> > > difficult decision making people split their votes through such amount
> of
> > > candidates.
> > >
> > > @Piotr, as Harbs said if you want to start the vote thread th
Bead (or Beads; binding)
Braid
Boja
EdB
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 9:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of FlexJS
> project.
>
> LIST:
>
> Royale
> Boja
> Strand
> Bead
> Limber
> Boinga
> Braid
> Arise
>
> HOW DO WE VOTE:
> 1)
Royale: 710 repos match Royale on Github. One,
https://github.com/ian-culleton/royale is a "React-esque framework for
Javascript"
That is a little close to home...
EdB
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Alex Harui
wrote:
> A quick "suitable name search" on some other candidates:
>
> Braid: 26
>
> One way I was thinking about a vote was by allowing everyone to pick up to
> three options. Option 1 would count for 3 points, option 2 for 2 and option
> 3 for 1.
>
Excellent idea!
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
> have a problem if someone created a runtime we wanted to target called
> "Dover".
>
Are you testing the non-native speakers?
I spilt some of my coffee over that one ;-)
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Olaf,
Have a great vacation!
EdB
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Olaf Krueger wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd just like to let you know that this my last day at work before I'll
> start a holiday trip over a few weeks.
> Hence I've been unsubscribed from the list. Probably I will be sporadically
> onlin
BendForward...
(just kidding!)
EdB
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Mihai Chira wrote:
> How about FlexForward? Maybe better for the project name.
>
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:48 Harbs wrote:
>
> > Here’s a list of other options which came up off-list:
> >
> > > Limber (or maybe Limbre/Limbur
No (binding)
EdB
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
>
> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
> discussed.
> [ ] Abstain - Don’t
Piotr,
I'm not subscribed, would you mind doing this for me?
EdB
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> I think this should be also forwarded to users group.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
>
> 2017-09-14 14:02 GMT+02:00 Erik de Br
Hi,
With the upcoming fork and renewed focus and most likely some publicity, I
want to ask the community to answer this question:
Why should a web dev choose FlexJS to write JS applications, and not go
with a more mainstream option like e.g. TypeScript/Angular?
I think that if we can answer that
>
> [...] so my preference stays with Blend
>
Bend, Erik, not BLend. Wow.
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
#x27;')
>
> hehe
>
> ;)
>
>
>
> 2017-09-14 9:29 GMT+02:00 Erik de Bruin :
>
> > Royale
> >
> > makes me think of French hamburgers :-)
> >
> > I do like
> >
> > Bend
> >
> > To keep things simple, my prime can
Royale
makes me think of French hamburgers :-)
I do like
Bend
To keep things simple, my prime candidate is still simply
FlexJS
EdB
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Piotr Zarzycki
wrote:
> Don't you think guys that is too much references, regarding what Alex
> found?
>
> We are writing in
For an Apache project, I think FlexJS would be the best name.
EdB
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Olaf Krueger wrote:
> I would stick with the name "FlexJS" for now.
> I do not think that people associate negative vibes with it.
> So many other JS frameworks are born every day, I think a ne
Hi,
This morning my eye fell on this encouraging statistic: the splicers for
the first time had to process more than 5000 video calls a day last week.
This is up from < 2000 this time last year. Go Homewav!
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I.
Remember to vote in the [VOTE] thread.
EdB
2017-09-04 9:29 GMT+02:00 Jose Barragan :
> I think is the best option.
> Hope I could be part of this.
>
> +1
> __
> *Jose Barragan*
> *Senior Software Engineer*
> Codeoscopic
> +34 912 94 80 80 <+34%20912%2094%2080%2080>
> http:/
> Mailing Lists
>
> -private@
> -dev@
> -commits@
> -users@
> -issues@
>
> Version Control
>
> We would like to use GitBox if it is practical to convert the current git
> repos listed above. We want to explore using GitHub's wiki and
> documentation tools.
>
OK, if we're throwing names out there, here is one:
BendJS
EdB
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:55 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> I want to throw in the name FenixJS for the fork.
> Its a play on the words Flex + Phoenix. You know what that means :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
--
Ix Multimedia Soft
Hi,
With another release around the corner, I want to make sure that everyone
understands the new database change paradigm:
1) When you create a JIRA stack, it's database (a fresh copy of production)
is brought up to date with the recent changes made earlier in the dev
process by automatically ru
Hi,
I'm rounding off my involvement in the project and want to (somehow) hand
over the Mustella VM, if anyone is interested - if it's still used.
Any takers?
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
At one point I had the entire SDK cross-compiling to Javascript. Look at
VF2JS, I think it is still in the repo.
It didn't run, but it was up to the point where "all" that was needed was a
lot of bootstrapping ;-)
EdB
On Monday, 28 March 2016, Alex Harui wrote:
> AFAIK, nobody has spent any
>
> Oh ... is VF2JS still valid? I thought this approach was dropped?
>
Both can be true, I'm afraid.
I created VF2JS to leverage the power of the Flex SDK but allow for
publication to JS in case Flash wasn't an option. I delayed work on it to
help out with the development of FlexJS. And I think
They are building for
> me. Post some console logs and I’ll try to take a look but I’ll be off
> the grid for the next several hours.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/27/15, 8:26 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>
> >Alex,
> >
> >I downloaded the nightly and after fixing
OK, I've manually started the Jenkins server, reset the Java security
permissions and reverted the Jenkins update and that has (so far) done the
trick... Mustella is now running.
We'll see.
EdB
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Well, that's what I t
Alex,
I downloaded the nightly and after fixing all my dependencies (it's been a
while), I was able to build the project from source. However, when trying
to build the examples, no go. I think there may be some references to the
old .jar names (jsc.jar instead of asjsc.jar) perhaps?
Thanks,
EdB
>
> Well but isn't that what the Infra guys are for?
>
> If something doesn't work, they'll help us fix it ... at least every time
> I contacted them they were more than willing to help. It's just that from
> our side there didn't seem to be much interest in them helping us.
>
That is not entirely
and give it a try!
Have a nice weekend!
EdB
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> What about flex-mustella.cloudapp.net ?
>>>
>>
>> I wasn't aware there was an issue here. I'll look into it.
>>
>
> That was one ignored VM ;
>
> What about flex-mustella.cloudapp.net ?
>>
>
> I wasn't aware there was an issue here. I'll look into it.
>
That was one ignored VM ;-)
I've updated the test script, the various debug players, Windows, Jenkins,
Chrome and the VM (increased size, will sponsor the cost).
I'll monitor for the n
>
> What about flex-mustella.cloudapp.net ?
>
I wasn't aware there was an issue here. I'll look into it.
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Yishay,
I'll be happy to work with you to finish and donate this code to Apache
Flex.
I can help you familiarize yourself with the Wiki, JIRA and other Apache
Flex procedures, and I can commit your code for review by myself and others.
Let me know,
EdB
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 11:17 PM, yishay
I looked into this a while ago. It seemed related to the 'externs' that are
fed into the GCC. The SVG externs are bunched in with the 'regular' JS.SWC
externs, but there are some issues with the SVG externs such that they
cause trouble :-(
I (obviously) wasn't able to fix it.
Also, the SVG stuff
I would prefer left to right naming: source to target:
mxml-jsc, as-jsc, etc.
EdB
On Thursday, August 20, 2015, Josh Tynjala > wrote:
> These are pretty straightforward options:
>
> js-mxmlc
> jsmxmlc
>
> I'd lean more towards the version with the dash in the name, if we consider
> that we al
That'd be me ;-)
I'm AFK until Monday, then I'll do a hard reboot and update some stuff as
well.
OK?
EdB
On Tuesday, August 18, 2015, Tom Chiverton wrote:
> On 18/08/15 00:20, Mark Kessler wrote:
>
>> I think for doing a hard reboot it has to be done by the instance manager.
>>
>> -Mark
>>
>
> Hmm. I think I’ll stop what I’m doing (which is trying to make UI widgets
> handle more CSS) and make the switch back to “.” I didn’t realize it
> would get messy with the Language class.
>
Yes, please.
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I
igure out how to tell they’ve seen my request for renewal.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 7/10/15, 7:08 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>
> >I had to 'manually' renew mine the first time, since then they
> >automatically renew me...
> >
> >EdB
> >
>
I had to 'manually' renew mine the first time, since then they
automatically renew me...
EdB
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hmm. It says my subscription expired. I got notices in May and
> submitted the form. The notices said things would stop on June 1. I never
>
No, there should be a full signature, if I'm not mistaken. But since I was
last in the emitter, they switched to using Object.createProperties. I'm
not familiar with the expected outcome for that pattern.
EdB
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
> Is that expected the qux me
>
> > Fixed some issues that were preventing the release code to work. It still
> > doesn't, but we're closer ;-)
> >
> > Will look further into this tonight.
>
> Any progress on that ?
>
Unfortunately not, maybe I'll be able to spend a few hours on it on
Wednesday.
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Soft
Nice!
I'm starting to see the light at the end of the tunnel again, so if you
have some grunt work that I can spend a couple of hours on, I'll be glad to
help out.
EdB
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I got all the changes required to stop using @expose and
Can you check in the 'js-debug' if the Main.js has an 'exportSymbol'
statement at the bottom?
EdB
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Are you using IntelliJ?
>
> Then you're on your own :-P
>
> I'll post my command line scrip
; tell GCC to use
> >> those to prevent renaming
> >>
> >> We've worked so hard to create AS classes from the Closure externs,
> let's
> >> not forget what these were originally intended for... and what we need
> them
> >> for: preven
simply assumed
a JS file with the same name as the SWC exists, but for 'js.swc', I need to
generically check if there are any files in the 'externs' "directory" in
the SWC so I can include them in the procedure I wrote.
Thanks,
EdB
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:05
for: prevent renaming of externally declared functions. We needed to
> include the original extern files in their respective SWCs so we can later
> present them to the GCC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erik de Bruin
>
>
> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-falcon/repo
> C
gt;>> From: erikdebr...@apache.org
> >>> To: comm...@flex.apache.org
> >>> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:46:37 +
> >>> Subject: [4/5] git commit: [flex-falcon] [refs/heads/develop] - Fix
> >> uncaught exception
> >>>
> >>> Fix uncaug
; > Subject: [3/5] git commit: [flex-falcon] [refs/heads/develop] - Fix NPE
> >
> > Fix NPE
> >
> > This time such that the diff looks nicer ;-)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Erik de Bruin
> >
> >
> > Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/
to compile a modified version of Fred's
> JQuery externs example. I know next to nothing about Falcon, so if more
> enlightened folks can trace this back to the root cause, that would be
> lovely :-)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Erik de Bruin
> >
> >
> > Project:
OK, got it working well enough to have a look at both the debug and release
code (nice example, Fred!).
Fixed some issues that were preventing the release code to work. It still
doesn't, but we're closer ;-)
Will look further into this tonight.
EdB
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Frédéric THO
gt; Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but
> we now have 1.9 in AS
> >> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >>
> >> Ah,
> >>
> >> Nasty Fred ;-)
> >>
> >> your instructions say: -define+=CONFIG::AS
>
Ah,
Nasty Fred ;-)
your instructions say: -define+=CONFIG::AS
but in the .as file, it says: COMPILE::AS3
The devil is in the details, as always, I guess.
EdB
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Nope, nothing. Still no compiler defines recognized on the first s
t;>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>> A little patience with a terribly out of date committer: how does one
> who
> >>>> may have missed (more than) a few emails compile (or download?) these
> >>>> famous SWCs?
> >
6 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> >
> >> He posted his .AS in one of the four links. That and the js.swc and
> >> jquery.swc should be all the ingredients.
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 6/30/15, 7:44 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
> >>
&
nJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we
> now have 1.9 in AS
> > Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:56:46 +
> >
> > He posted his .AS in one of the four links. That and the js.swc and
> > jquery.swc should be all the ingredients.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
and
> jquery.swc should be all the ingredients.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 6/30/15, 7:44 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>
> >I was hoping to get my hands on Fred's AS project. I want to run that
> >through the new compiler and have a long look at the output JS - debug and
>
wrote:
>
>
> On 6/30/15, 7:28 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>
> >GCC no likey ;-)
> >
> >Can I maybe have a look at the example project? I've been gone for a
> >while,
> >but if I'm correct I should be able to get the latest stuff from
an a large hurdle to get back in
the game for a bit :-(
EdB
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Yeah, I think that’s at least one issue. HTMLContainer.js is a transpiled
> extern and we aren’t putting them in the externs list in the publisher.
>
> -Alex
>
> O
Is there a handwritten or transpiled "HTMLContainer.js" to go with that? Or
am I missing something?
EdB
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
> > OK, maybe I didn’t understand you earlier, but yes, the above is what I
> > see in the output.
>
> Yes, it was a conversation abo
>
> Actually, I just studied the code more and it's subclass hell(I didn't work
> on this part of the framework).
>
Thanks, mate ;-)
That should teach you to always do everything yourself!
EdB
P.S. In case you missed it, I'm just kidding. There are (many) parts of the
code that deserve the atte
Mike,
I wholeheartedly agree with the need for a uniform formatting, and I think
it doesn't really matter which rules are used, as long as they are used.
A matter of procedure though: what you are doing with the '3 days till
armageddon' is actually called a "lazy vote". Normally we do prefix the
Yeah, but that is a very, very different design pattern and would require
substantial work on the transpiler to make that output possible. It would
also, I believe, be incompatible with the way the GCC optimizes (not
minimize, mind you) the code, so that advantage would be lost as well.
As our JS
It's the little things ;-)
EdB
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> Thanks Alex!
>
> Mike
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:42 AM, wrote:
>
> > copy-o
> >
> >
> > Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-falcon/repo
> > Commit:
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/rep
Alex,
You're right. Let's count the votes and move on.
Contributions in the form of actual patches or even constructive comments
are always welcome and will certainly be part of the next release (which
everyone is free to create and put to a vote, btw). Just let's not let them
interfere with the
+1
Despite the problems getting the source version to compile, when it does,
it works as expected. Since the Installer is mostly a binary convenience
utility, it gets my vote.
EdB
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> And this time I made sure I ran the ApprovalScript before h
Alex,
I'm very sorry for the delay in my repsonse, but this time I get:
/Users/erik/Desktop/flex/apache-flex-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src/installer/src/InstallApacheFlex-app.xml:
error 305: Intial window content SWF version 28 exceeds namespace version
http://ns.adobe.com/air/application/4.0
when run
>
> Anyone else seeing this or have I done something wrong?
>
I reported this about an hour ago.
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
> build.number=0
>
> Ignoring the incorrect dates, should the build.number be 0?
>
?
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Hi,
Just trying to run the approve script. I get a failure while building. The
'packageair' step is looking for NOTICE in the 'installer' subdirectory,
where it isn't. It seems to be in the root.
Also I noticed that running the approve script that it doesn't check the
PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME variable b
Is this a sudden exodus - with all the same erroneous subject - or a new
kind of spam?
EdB
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Sesiom nyllor
wrote:
>
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
> Erik, this was in regards to Alex asking about a TypeScript emitter for AS
> - > TS. I said TS doesn't support property inheritance yet, so you would
> have to rename properties to set/get when doing a TS emitter. The I said,
> some AS dev might already have a setFoo() where they also have a se
>
> As far as subclassing, it handles it fine, it's properties that they don't
> support right now. As I said previously, they say call Java like mutator
> methods. So if you wrote an emitter, all properties would be converted to
> "setFoo(), getFoo()" but that could be a conflict as some AS code c
I've rebooted through the Azure Portal. I'm now letting it run Windows
Update, if you check back in about an hour (give or take), it should be
purring along nicely...
EdB
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Tom Chiverton wrote:
> I can't access the flex-mustella remote desktop, it just fails to
>
> So Erik, are you saying that since it soon will fully support ES6, the
> FalconJX compiler should be able to emit ES6?
>
Most certainly. The combination of ES6 and 'TypeScript typing' (ES6_TYPED)
support should make the life of FalconJX much easier. To me it seems that
there is lot's less 'tra
Hi,
While I'm sorry to say that I'm still knee deep in a work project and won't
have time to contribute for some time yet, this weekend I ran across
something that might be helpful for the project:
The Closure Compiler has made large improvements over the past few
releases. One area is ECMASript
>
> Sounds like a convoluted way to do this.
>
> I think we are overthinking this.
Ya think?
This is what happens when you let loose the lawyers ;-)
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Yes, double bump.
Can someone please take a look at this?
EdB
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Dretch wrote:
> Github user Dretch commented on the pull request:
>
> https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/pull/18#issuecomment-110656554
>
> Bump. Could this pull request be considered?
>
>
Can someone please take a look a this?
Thanks,
EdB
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:09 PM, adpg wrote:
> GitHub user adpg opened a pull request:
>
> https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/pull/19
>
> Update DateTimeFormatterEx.as
>
> Proposing patch for bug Apache Flex / FLEX-34581: DateSpi
>
> we’ll get an answer by then otherwise I think I’ll just rename the
> “Disclaimer” link button to “Legal Stuff” and add the L & N to the web
> page it points to.
>
That absolutely makes the most sense of anything I've read on the thread.
+ 1
Just do it ;-)
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
>
> On 6/2/15, 11:45 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>
> >I think the best solution, 'goog' safe, would be to define the field on
> >the
> >prototype (with all the proper JSDoc annotations) and then initialize it
> >in
> >the constructor.
>
array is not shared.
>
> So I think Mike has two choices:
> 1) initialize everything in the constructor
> 2) be smart about what can be initialized in the constructor vs the
> prototype.
>
> I’ll leave it up to Mike to decide. We can always be smarter later.
>
> -Alex
>
&g
1 - 100 of 2506 matches
Mail list logo
