Is there a handwritten or transpiled "HTMLContainer.js" to go with that? Or am I missing something?
EdB On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > OK, maybe I didn’t understand you earlier, but yes, the above is what I > > see in the output. > > Yes, it was a conversation about private, protected members, maybe that's > why. > > > The release version of my test app does get called and executed by the > > browser. Maybe post the html that was generated? > > the AS3: > https://paste.apache.org/6gCj > > The Debug HTML: > https://paste.apache.org/1MwN > > The Debug JS: > https://paste.apache.org/7QgT > > The Release HTML: > https://paste.apache.org/j903 > > The Release JS: > https://paste.apache.org/jdJR > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > ---------------------------------------- > > From: aha...@adobe.com > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we > now have 1.9 in AS > > Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 05:30:16 +0000 > > > > > > > > On 6/29/15, 1:17 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>>Now, if I run the index.html from js-release in the browser, I got > >>>>"Uncaught ReferenceError: Main is not defined" whatever start() is > >>>>public > >>>>or not. > >>> > >>> I will take a look. Interestingly, I cannot duplicate the constructor > >>> containing the private function body, so I don’t know why you are > >>>getting > >>> different results than me. > >> > >>The constructor does contain a private function body here, but a public > >>function: > >> > >>>> private function start():void { > >>>> HtmlContainer.load([JQUERY_SCRIPT], run); > >>>> } > >> > >>is translated to: > >> > >>/** > >> * @private > >> */ > >>Main.prototype.start = function() { > >> HtmlContainer.load([Main.JQUERY_SCRIPT], Main.run); > >>}; > > > > OK, maybe I didn’t understand you earlier, but yes, the above is what I > > see in the output. > > > >> > >>and there's is no compile time check for start() called from the html > >>script because > >>this one is not compiled by jscomp. > >> > >>I was thinking and hoping we had some runtime enforcements but realized > >>we have none, > >>the opposite could have make me love more JS whenever I had to debug a > >>FLEXJS output > >>type only application. > > > > Well, IMO, in most cases you won’t need runtime enforcement because, > other > > than this particular entry point, all other code paths should get checked > > by the compiler. If you want to add a specific check for the entry point, > > that’s fine with me. > > > > The release version of my test app does get called and executed by the > > browser. Maybe post the html that was generated? > > > > -Alex > > > > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
