>
> Actually, I just studied the code more and it's subclass hell(I didn't work
> on this part of the framework).
>
Thanks, mate ;-)
That should teach you to always do everything yourself!
EdB
P.S. In case you missed it, I'm just kidding. There are (many) parts of the
code that deserve the atte
Mike,
I wholeheartedly agree with the need for a uniform formatting, and I think
it doesn't really matter which rules are used, as long as they are used.
A matter of procedure though: what you are doing with the '3 days till
armageddon' is actually called a "lazy vote". Normally we do prefix the
The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache
Flex SDK Installer 3.2
Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source application framework for
building and maintaining expressive applications that deploy consistently
on all major browsers, desktops and devices (including s
On 6/28/15, 2:21 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Josh Tynjala
>wrote:
>
>> Yes, that is correct.
>>
>> In case it wasn't obvious, event listeners are the typical use case
>>where
>> you'd pass a reference to a member function somewhere else where a
>> reference
On 6/28/15, 1:19 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>Thanks again, Alex. I had some time to give it a try it today. The CSS
>file
>isn't created, and the classes aren't renamed. That looks good. It still
>creates an HTML file, though. I'm looking for the only output to be
>JavaScript.
Ah, sorry, I miss
Will send in a minute or two. I updated the badge last night to and
wanted to see if anybody complained.
-Alex
On 6/28/15, 7:39 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Has the announcement email gone out?
>
>Justin
Hi,
Has the announcement email gone out?
Justin
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Josh Tynjala wrote:
> Cool. Sounds like a good foundation.
>
> I was able to get CreateJS up and running today. I only drew a circle and
> animated it's position, but it's a start. I need to finish up the first
> beta of the Feathers SDK this coming week, but I'll
Cool. Sounds like a good foundation.
I was able to get CreateJS up and running today. I only drew a circle and
animated it's position, but it's a start. I need to finish up the first
beta of the Feathers SDK this coming week, but I'll have more time to play
around after that's out.
- Josh
On Sun
Word, that is great.
Now we have a lot of control with what we want to do with js-output-type
jsc because we have a whole new backend and I am not going to step on
FlexJS if we want to start doing things to a custom emitter, publisher etc.
Mike
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Josh Tynjala wrot
Thanks, Mike! That did the trick. I thought maybe I was building something
wrong for a minute there.
- Josh
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> Actually, I just studied the code more and it's subclass hell(I didn't work
> on this part of the framework).
>
> I rewrote the
Hi,
I am going to let this thread sit for 3 days and if nobody objects, I am
going to commit a code format xml(with Apache header) from Eclipse that was
used for most of my development of FalconJX 2 years ago.
Yeah it may not be what everybody likes but a lot of the framework I wrote
was formatte
Actually, I just studied the code more and it's subclass hell(I didn't work
on this part of the framework).
I rewrote the backend and created a JSCBackend that just stubs off the
writeHTML(), can you let me know if this commit works.
Mike
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
Here's the JIRA ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34897
- Josh
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Josh Tynjala
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, that is correct.
> >
> > In case it wasn't obvious, event listeners are the typical use
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Josh Tynjala wrote:
> Yes, that is correct.
>
> In case it wasn't obvious, event listeners are the typical use case where
> you'd pass a reference to a member function somewhere else where a
> reference needs to be saved in a variable. AS3 made this easy by
> auto
Yes, that is correct.
In case it wasn't obvious, event listeners are the typical use case where
you'd pass a reference to a member function somewhere else where a
reference needs to be saved in a variable. AS3 made this easy by
automatically binding member functions. JavaScript usually requires so
So this only happens in javascript when you pass an object function to a
variable? SO what I am saying is that not using this.func() is what looses
the connection to the instance scope and then this becaomes window, correct?
Mike
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Josh Tynjala wrote:
> In Flash P
I just committed this change, can you test it Josh?
Mike
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> I can take a look real quick, I have a feeling I know where it is, Alex I
> think is on vacation.
>
> Mike
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Josh Tynjala
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks
In Flash Player, when you save a reference to a member function, you can
call the function reference, and "this" will still be bound to the instance
where it came from.
public class Test
{
public function Test()
{
this.func();
var func:Function = this.func;
func();
I can take a look real quick, I have a feeling I know where it is, Alex I
think is on vacation.
Mike
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Josh Tynjala wrote:
> Thanks again, Alex. I had some time to give it a try it today. The CSS file
> isn't created, and the classes aren't renamed. That looks goo
Thanks again, Alex. I had some time to give it a try it today. The CSS file
isn't created, and the classes aren't renamed. That looks good. It still
creates an HTML file, though. I'm looking for the only output to be
JavaScript.
- Josh
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Josh Tynjala wrote:
> Than
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
> I just found that
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/881515/how-do-i-declare-a-namespace-in-javascript
>
> There are I guess all the ways to create them.
>
haha I looked at that very same thread a couple weeks ago.
There is a way that
I just found that
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/881515/how-do-i-declare-a-namespace-in-javascript
There are I guess all the ways to create them.
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 15:51:45 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Externs] jasmine-2.0.js
> From:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
> > My intuition is telling me I am not handling them correctly for most
> cases,
> > things work right now but it would be better if we had some test .js
> files
> > that had all types of package/namespace creation structures.
>
> Like what
> My intuition is telling me I am not handling them correctly for most cases,
> things work right now but it would be better if we had some test .js files
> that had all types of package/namespace creation structures.
Like what ?
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date:
Alright !
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 15:28:54 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Externs] jasmine-2.0.js
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> Fred, what I plan on doing since you are going to be working with the code
> is start
And... haha packages are really sketchy. We need more package type test
from the externs that use them.
My intuition is telling me I am not handling them correctly for most cases,
things work right now but it would be better if we had some test .js files
that had all types of package/namespace cre
Fred, what I plan on doing since you are going to be working with the code
is start to test all the base externs we have and find bugs or non
implemented things. I will probably just add the things I find in JIRA
throughout the week during my little free time.
I'm not going to change any code, jus
Thanks !
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 15:11:20 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Externs] jasmine-2.0.js
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> Yeah I know, sent to your hotmail.
>
> Mike
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Frédé
Yeah I know, sent to your hotmail.
Mike
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
> > What you can do is to send me your eclipse formatter property file.
> > I will use it in IJ.
>
> I meant export your formatter profiles in xml
>
> Thanks,
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
>
> What you can do is to send me your eclipse formatter property file.
> I will use it in IJ.
I meant export your formatter profiles in xml
Thanks,
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Externs] jasmine-
> BTW, what should we do about code formatting, it seems my formatting is
> different then yours. I am using Eclipse right now since I don't have IJ
> setup for Falcon dev.
I was wrong when I thought I had setup IJ correctly for Falcon, they are still
things it doesn't know how to do, for instanc
BTW, what should we do about code formatting, it seems my formatting is
different then yours. I am using Eclipse right now since I don't have IJ
setup for Falcon dev.
Mike
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> Yeah, I didn't want to go crazy with subclasses. Ideally class,
Yeah, I didn't want to go crazy with subclasses. Ideally class, function
and constant could share a "TopLevelReference" subclass of BaseReference
and you could put import logic there if you wanted to.
Mike
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
> > Once you find instances of im
> Once you find instances of imports that need to be saves, your current
> context is already the ClassReference, so call classRef.addImport(). :)
Btw, I will probably need to have a addImport() FunctionReference too, right ?
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Sun,
> If it's top level why would we need an import, I am confused?
lol, sorry, not enough coffee !!
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 14:41:52 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Externs] jasmine-2.0.js
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
If it's top level why would we need an import, I am confused?
Mike
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
> > I am going to be busy most of the week remodeling my mother in laws
> > bathroom starting tomorrow. So if you want to try a new custom pass like
> > ResolveImportPass,
> I am going to be busy most of the week remodeling my mother in laws
> bathroom starting tomorrow. So if you want to try a new custom pass like
> ResolveImportPass, go for it, I will just stay out of the way. I think it
> would be good for you. :) If not, no worries, you gave me the idea. haha
>
>
BTW, this goes for Constant, Function and Class/Interface top level refs.
You visit each one of these references from the model and go into the class
members or function/constant signatures.
Mike
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> Kewl.
>
> I am going to be busy most of
Kewl.
I am going to be busy most of the week remodeling my mother in laws
bathroom starting tomorrow. So if you want to try a new custom pass like
ResolveImportPass, go for it, I will just stay out of the way. I think it
would be good for you. :) If not, no worries, you gave me the idea. haha
If
> All I meant is that 75% of the time we would just want to save things in
> the model or a reference, such that you use addImport() during the
> resolution. Then it keeps the emit() phase straight burn rubber and loop
> through all existing model structures, where imports would be just a list
> th
By the way, I know you see visit a lot but this implementation is not
recursive in the way FalconJX is.
The main loop iterates over a SCRIPT node's children 1 level deep. When
certain node structures are found in the child, a visit*() method is called
to visit that child node. There isn't anywhere
Fred you did an awesome job. :)
All I meant is that 75% of the time we would just want to save things in
the model or a reference, such that you use addImport() during the
resolution. Then it keeps the emit() phase straight burn rubber and loop
through all existing model structures, where imports
> Fred pretty much iterated things correctly.
>
> The ResolvePackageNamePass I haven't to get back to. I was in the middle of
> implementing something when I got it to work in another place.
>
> There is a pattern to how things are parsed so most of the time it's better
> to set state as nodes/refe
+ Manage the case where a custom class belongs
+ to the top level package and needs to be imported
+ in a sub-package as I don't know how to deal with
+ builtin classes.
Can you explain this a bit more? I am not understanding the problem, if a
class
Fred pretty much iterated things correctly.
The ResolvePackageNamePass I haven't to get back to. I was in the middle of
implementing something when I got it to work in another place.
There is a pattern to how things are parsed so most of the time it's better
to set state as nodes/references are b
> I was going to change this last night, you beat me to it.
:-) Yes, it was a bit perturbing.
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 12:51:38 -0400
> Subject: Re: [2/2] git commit: [flex-falcon] [refs/heads/develop] - Renamed
> ExcludedMemeber to Excl
I was going to change this last night, you beat me to it.
Mike
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 12:25 PM, wrote:
> Renamed ExcludedMemeber to ExcludedMember
>
>
> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-falcon/repo
> Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-falcon/commit/108dc013
48 matches
Mail list logo
