Fred you did an awesome job. :)
All I meant is that 75% of the time we would just want to save things in
the model or a reference, such that you use addImport() during the
resolution. Then it keeps the emit() phase straight burn rubber and loop
through all existing model structures, where imports would be just a list
that emitImport() iterates through, no logic.
I AM NOT saying what you did was wrong, I am just offering a look into how
I set it up. You know how I got this pattern? From my massive mistakes in
code generators of past. :) I realized that an emit phase needs to be
stupid and not dependent on any type of intelligence, just needs to create
what already exists.
This can also solve many problems at once. So I haven't got back into the
code BUT my intuition says we need a universal solution for any type of
TYPE that is attached to a member, identifier such as a param type, return
type, filed type, superclass and interface(already taken care of using
addImport()).
See where I am coming from? We know that every type is eventually going to
need to be scanned for imports and validated.
Dude, I just don't want to come off bossy or condescending, I love you
help. A lot can be added to this compiler that could be very interesting.
So having you understand my design intention is really important to me. :)
Mike
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> > Fred pretty much iterated things correctly.
> >
> > The ResolvePackageNamePass I haven't to get back to. I was in the middle
> of
> > implementing something when I got it to work in another place.
> >
> > There is a pattern to how things are parsed so most of the time it's
> better
> > to set state as nodes/references are being added to the model. In the
> case
> > of imports, I don't see any problems right now with checking during the
> > emit phase but, if the model was more interactive during the session,
> this
> > type of logic should happen during the resolve phase so the model with
> it's
> > references has a correct state if there is any logic happening between
> two
> > references.
>
> Thanks for the explanation, I will take the time to do some debug spins to
> understand
> when the phases are called, what they do and what classes are involved.
> Given it is a fairly small transpiler and despite the recursive visitor
> pattern, I guess I can do it.
>
> > How much are you working on right now Fred? I just ask because I don't
> want
> > to create any conflicts.
>
> Go ahead Mike, I'm done with that at the moment, I did my last cleanup
> already.
> Anyway, better I work on a branch and commit the branch instead for review
> next time.
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
> > Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 13:23:15 -0400
> > Subject: Re: [Externs] jasmine-2.0.js
> > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >
> > Fred pretty much iterated things correctly.
> >
> > The ResolvePackageNamePass I haven't to get back to. I was in the middle
> of
> > implementing something when I got it to work in another place.
> >
> > There is a pattern to how things are parsed so most of the time it's
> better
> > to set state as nodes/references are being added to the model. In the
> case
> > of imports, I don't see any problems right now with checking during the
> > emit phase but, if the model was more interactive during the session,
> this
> > type of logic should happen during the resolve phase so the model with
> it's
> > references has a correct state if there is any logic happening between
> two
> > references.
> >
> > How much are you working on right now Fred? I just ask because I don't
> want
> > to create any conflicts.
> >
> > Mike
> > .
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Michael Schmalle <
> teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> Hey Fred, I was out all day. I will have some time in the morning to
> look
> >> at what you did and comment. :)
> >>
> >> Mike
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <
> webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Just to explain what I did, especially to folks who would like to get
> >>> their hand dirty on the compiler but like me, don't know how it works
> :-)
> >>>
> >>> I was adding jasmine-2.0.js [1], a file that contains only jsDoc
> >>> (parameters and return type descriptions) and declarations, no
> >>> implementations.
> >>> When I say "adding jasmine-2.0.js" I mean, transpile this .js file to
> .as
> >>> and then compile it to a .swc.
> >>>
> >>> The transpilation part is done by EXTERNC
> >>>
> >>> You call it like that:
> >>>
> >>> <java jar="${basedir}/compiler.jx/lib/externc.jar" fork="true"
> >>> failonerror="false">
> >>> <arg value="+flexlib=${env.ASJS_HOME}/frameworks" />
> >>> <arg value="-debug" />
> >>> <arg
> >>>
> value="-load-config=${basedir}/externs/jasmine/jasmine-compile-config.xml"
> >>> />
> >>>
> >>> In the jasmine-compile-config.xml, you can exclude classes and member,
> >>> for example, in the jasmine.Spec class, I excluded the variable
> $injector
> >>> as its type was coming from the Angular library that is not yet
> transpiled.
> >>>
> >>> <field-exclude>
> >>> <class>jasmine.Spec</class>
> >>> <field>$injector</field>
> >>> </field-exclude>
> >>>
> >>> You can also exclude classes and functions.
> >>>
> >>> The compile part is done by the falcon compc as follow:
> >>>
> >>> <java jar="${basedir}/compiler/generated/dist/sdk/lib/falcon-compc.jar"
> >>> fork="true"
> >>> failonerror="true">
> >>> <arg value="+flexlib=${env.ASJS_HOME}/frameworks" />
> >>> <arg value="-debug" />
> >>> <arg
> >>> value="-load-config=${basedir}/externs/jasmine/compile-config.xml" />
> >>> <arg
> >>> value="-output=${basedir}/externs/jasmine/out/bin/jasmine-2.0.swc" />
> >>> </java>
> >>>
> >>> The problem was that this last part was failing with an NPE a Type of
> >>> something:
> >>>
> >>>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.scopes.TypeScope.getPropertyForMemberAccess(TypeScope.java:344)
> >>>
> >>> Even looking closely at the code, I didn't get why it was failing but
> for
> >>> sure, because it was trying to compile one of the transpiled .as file,
> this
> >>> transpiled code was wrong.
> >>> Looking at those .as, it was easy to see that some import were missing.
> >>>
> >>> So, why the 2 others externs (js and jquery) had no issues ?
> >>> It is always surprising to see something working on all the things
> except
> >>> of yours, but it can help you too :-)
> >>>
> >>> So, I've been looking at those other transpiled .as files from existing
> >>> externs to see if they had imports and they were some.
> >>> I then created a mini jasmine.js containing only the faulty case only,
> >>> that, from what I've been able to determinate, was that the import was
> not
> >>> generated when a static function had a return type of a class created
> via a
> >>> function constructor, so, I filled this mini jasmine.js with the
> equivalent
> >>> of a static function like this:
> >>>
> >>> /**
> >>> * @return {!jasmine.Clock}
> >>> */
> >>> jasmine.clock = function() {};
> >>>
> >>> Which should transpile in AS3, something like:
> >>>
> >>> import jasmine.Clock;
> >>> public static function clock():Clock {}
> >>>
> >>> and a function constructor like this:
> >>>
> >>> /** @constructor */
> >>> jasmine.Clock = function() {};
> >>>
> >>> which transpile:
> >>>
> >>> package jasmine {
> >>> public class Clock {}
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> Created a test class based on those Mike created for the previous
> externs
> >>> doing:
> >>>
> >>> // jasmine, the main jasmine class.
> >>> ClassReference jasmine = model.getClassReference("jasmine");
> >>> assertNotNull(jasmine);
> >>>
> >>> assertTrue(jasmine.hasImport("jasmine.Clock"));
> >>>
> >>> The hasImport method didn't exist on ClassReference but it was a
> >>> addImport(), I follow to where it was called in ResolvePackagesPass
> hoping
> >>> to find a missing case but after debug spin I wasn't able to do what I
> >>> expected, I'm not sure I understood all the logic in this class but it
> >>> looked like the Node of my return type was never visited and therefore
> >>> wasn't able to add my import here.
> >>>
> >>> But wait, in the ClassReference, I have a
> >>>
> >>> public MethodReference addMethod(Node node, String functionName,
> >>> JSDocInfo comment, boolean isStatic)
> >>>
> >>> To me it would be enough to add the import to the list of imports to be
> >>> emitted when the MethodReference is to be added, I just had to
> determinate
> >>> if the return type given in the jsDoc was not from the current
> package, the
> >>> given method not excluded, the given return type neither !
> >>>
> >>> My test was passing was I was able to compile with this new code the
> old
> >>> externs.
> >>>
> >>> The only thing I had to do to finish to compile the jasmine extern was
> to
> >>> emit the imports for the global functions too as they shown to be
> faulty
> >>> for the same reasons.
> >>>
> >>> Mike will probably tell me now where my logic was wrong now :-)
> >>>
> >>> Frédéric THOMAS
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----------------------------------------
> >>>> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> >>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >>>> Subject: RE: [Externs] jasmine-2.0.js
> >>>> Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 20:43:43 +0100
> >>>>
> >>>> Ok, done !
> >>>>
> >>>> I forgot to uncomment the externc build of jasmine and print the
> global
> >>> function imports !
> >>>>
> >>>> Frédéric THOMAS
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ----------------------------------------
> >>>>> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> >>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >>>>> Subject: RE: [Externs] jasmine-2.0.js
> >>>>> Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 20:12:16 +0100
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I pushed the changes which are ready to be reviewed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> oups, hold on, I had some things commented that hidden other
> problems,
> >>> I will continue on it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Frédéric THOMAS
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ----------------------------------------
> >>>>>> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> >>>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >>>>>> Subject: RE: [Externs] jasmine-2.0.js
> >>>>>> Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 18:31:32 +0100
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Mike,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I pushed the changes which are ready to be reviewed.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Note: The jasmine-2.0.js is not committed as it should be downloaded
> >>> with the unpack-externs target of the download.xml, I followed the
> model.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Frédéric THOMAS
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> >>>>>>> Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 05:31:50 -0400
> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Externs] jasmine-2.0.js
> >>>>>>> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I just noticed you said today or tomorrow, whatever man. doesn't
> >>> matter.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Mike
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 5:17 AM, Michael Schmalle <
> >>> teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Well its the practice. I know the pattern I am using so if I have
> to
> >>>>>>>> adjust it to fit I will. You can tell that with AST type stuff, it
> >>> has to
> >>>>>>>> follow a specific pattern or everything turns to crap when trying
> >>> to add
> >>>>>>>> stuff down the road.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Commit it sooner than later as I have a couple hours to check it
> >>> out this
> >>>>>>>> morning.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Mike
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:15 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <
> >>> webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Mike,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I can now compile jasmine, I'm not sure my fix is very clean but
> it
> >>>>>>>>> works, I've been able to compile all the externs with.
> >>>>>>>>> I will commit it later today or tomorrow as I need to clean a bit
> >>> before
> >>>>>>>>> and it would be nice if you can review it.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>> Frédéric THOMAS
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [Externs] jasmine-2.0.js
> >>>>>>>>>> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 22:43:30 +0100
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hey Mike, it looks like "import jasmine.Clock;" is missing in
> the
> >>>>>>>>> generated jasmine.as, that's it !
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Frédéric THOMAS
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [Externs] jasmine-2.0.js
> >>>>>>>>>>> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 22:26:32 +0100
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> HAHA, ah that is a hard one man, thanks for the offer but I
> >>> think I am
> >>>>>>>>>>>> going to need to get this one. There are a couple places it
> >>> could be
> >>>>>>>>> though
> >>>>>>>>>>>> if you are curious.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> First you really need to understand the problem, I am typing
> >>> this
> >>>>>>>>> stuff in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> between installing a bathroom vanity and sink, so I haven't
> >>> looked at
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> code yet. :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> So I can't really give you an answer since I don't quite know
> >>> the
> >>>>>>>>> problem
> >>>>>>>>>>>> yet.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I will check your solution :-)
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Frédéric THOMAS
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:59:58 -0400
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Externs] jasmine-2.0.js
> >>>>>>>>>>>> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <
> >>>>>>>>> webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, this "jasmine.Clock"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The error means that the Falcon compiler is trying to
> resolve
> >>> a
> >>>>>>>>> member
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> expression and it can't resolve it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So this means there is a bug in the AST resolver. You are
> >>> using the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> extern
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the GCC project correct?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/google/closure-compiler/master/contrib/externs/jasmine-2.0.js
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If so, I need to take a look at it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, I did one pass and tests on packages and class
> >>> creation,
> >>>>>>>>> so
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> these
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> types of bugs are to be expected as the AST/Type resolver is
> >>>>>>>>> "asked" to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> do
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> more work then my initial implementation.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Make sense?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, kind of :-)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What classes would you check for this ?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> HAHA, ah that is a hard one man, thanks for the offer but I
> >>> think I am
> >>>>>>>>>>>> going to need to get this one. There are a couple places it
> >>> could be
> >>>>>>>>> though
> >>>>>>>>>>>> if you are curious.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> First you really need to understand the problem, I am typing
> >>> this
> >>>>>>>>> stuff in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> between installing a bathroom vanity and sink, so I haven't
> >>> looked at
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> code yet. :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> So I can't really give you an answer since I don't quite know
> >>> the
> >>>>>>>>> problem
> >>>>>>>>>>>> yet.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mike
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Frédéric THOMAS
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:32:16 -0400
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Externs] jasmine-2.0.js
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, this "jasmine.Clock"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The error means that the Falcon compiler is trying to
> resolve
> >>> a
> >>>>>>>>> member
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> expression and it can't resolve it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So this means there is a bug in the AST resolver. You are
> >>> using the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> extern
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the GCC project correct?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If so, I need to take a look at it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, I did one pass and tests on packages and class
> >>> creation,
> >>>>>>>>> so
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> these
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> types of bugs are to be expected as the AST/Type resolver is
> >>>>>>>>> "asked" to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> do
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> more work then my initial implementation.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Make sense?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Mike,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any idea why ?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> U:\sources\asf\flex\falcon\externs\jasmine\out\as\classes\
> >>>>>>>>> jasmine.as:26
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Erreur interne : java.lang.NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.scopes.TypeScope.getPropertyForMemberAccess(TypeScope.java:344)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.scopes.ScopeView.getPropertyForMemberAccess(ScopeView.java:81)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.scopes.ASScope.getPropertyFromDef(ASScope.java:879)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.scopes.ASScope.getPropertyFromDef(ASScope.java:841)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.scopes.ASScope.getPropertyFromDef(ASScope.java:760)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.tree.as.IdentifierNode.resolveMemberRef(IdentifierNode.java:829)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.tree.as.IdentifierNode.resolve(IdentifierNode.java:377)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.tree.as.IdentifierNode.getMName(IdentifierNode.java:432)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.tree.as.MemberAccessExpressionNode.getMName(MemberAccessExpressionNode.java:158)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.ABCGeneratingReducer.dottedName(ABCGeneratingReducer.java:840)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.CmcEmitter.action_321(CmcEmitter.java:5236)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public static function clock():jasmine.Clock { return
> null; }
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ^
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the jasmine extern file
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /**
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * @return {!jasmine.Clock}
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> */
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jasmine.clock = function() {};
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /** @constructor */
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jasmine.Clock = function() {};
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /** */
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jasmine.Clock.prototype.install = function() {};
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /** */
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jasmine.Clock.prototype.uninstall = function() {};
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /** @param {number} ms */
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jasmine.Clock.prototype.tick = function(ms) {};
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /** @param {!Date} date */
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jasmine.Clock.prototype.mockDate = function(date) {};
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In jasmine.as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /**
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * @see [jasmine-2.0]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * @returns {jasmine.Clock}
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> */
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public static function clock():jasmine.Clock { return
> null; }
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clock.as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package jasmine {
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /**
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * @see [jasmine-2.0]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> */
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public class Clock {
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /**
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * @see [jasmine-2.0]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> */
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public function Clock() {
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> super();
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /**
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Generated doc for missing method JSDoc.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * @see [jasmine-2.0]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> */
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public function install():void { }
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /**
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * @param ms [number]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * @see [jasmine-2.0]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> */
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public function tick(ms:Number):void { }
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /**
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Generated doc for missing method JSDoc.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * @see [jasmine-2.0]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> */
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public function uninstall():void { }
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /**
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * @param date [Date]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * @see [jasmine-2.0]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> */
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public function mockDate(date:Date):void { }
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Frédéric THOMAS
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
