Interesting stuff. Does anybody know if in Java or other languages that
support abstract classes and private constructors whether that is handled
by the runtime or by generated code? If generated code, what does the
generated code look like? If by runtime, is there open source code that
implemen
On 6/13/15, 3:15 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I was just curious if we can include the source for asdoc in the JS swc.
>IMHO it's pretty important dealing with the hundreds of classes and 1000's
>of fields and members a lot have some docs and most all have at least 1
>@see tag that dir
When debugging a regular flex mobile app on IntelliJ, I have been targeting
the iOS Simulator, instead of the Emulator(adl). I think the iOS Simulator
is only an option when on Mac. The problem I run across quite often, is that
I press the debug button without remembering to quit the iOS Simulator.
Try syncing up flex-falcon. Run ‘ant wipe-all’ and ‘ant all’
The compiler has changed how it finds files.
-Alex
On 6/13/15, 9:49 PM, "Darrell Loverin" wrote:
>Trying to build the release target:
>
>
>>ant -Dbuild.number=20140613 -Dbuild.prompt= release
>
>
>getting the below errors:
>
>
>basi
Trying to build the release target:
>ant -Dbuild.number=20140613 -Dbuild.prompt= release
getting the below errors:
basictests-compile-js:
[echo] FLEX_HOME: /Users/dloverin/ApacheFlex/asjs
[echo] FALCONJX_HOME: /Users/dloverin/ApacheFlex/falcon/compiler.jx
[echo] GOOG_HOME: /
Fred,
All this stuff is still not in the develop branch? I would like to try it in
intelij as you described in the video.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-Re-Re-Re-Re-AW-AW-AW-FlexJS-
Hi,
I was just curious if we can include the source for asdoc in the JS swc.
IMHO it's pretty important dealing with the hundreds of classes and 1000's
of fields and members a lot have some docs and most all have at least 1
@see tag that directs you to the w3c or whatever documentation.
Not to me
The way I see most groups doing this is have the release be a ZIP file with
the license and release notes. We shouldn't make it harder than that.
Nobody will open a hex editor to view a read me. The ext info in the
filesystem is generally limited to 256 characters (or 512 in newer os's)
including
Interesting, the byte code option is probably the best. I have no
experience in that part of the compiler(ABC emitter). I know it just emits
byte arrays but I get lost in there. :)
Mike
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
>
> Oups, I meant -optimize=true, that the optimizati
Oups, I meant -optimize=true, that the optimization process that erase the
annotations gather all the actions in one IIRC.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: [Falcon] More NS for ctor ? (was: [FlexJS] In
IIRC, I've been able to make the compiler to not complain when having private
and protected NS to the constructor, the player doesn't expect anything except
public, so, the trick was to add an internal annotation on the class (not
possible on the constructor itself) to keep that information and
Had IntelliJ locking the file and wasn't able to wipe it :-) done now, thanks
guys !!
Just committed btw.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Dat
In compiler.jx, run
ant super-clean
Then try again.
On 6/13/15, 9:25 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>Did you rebuild the compiler? There is a new version of the GCC compiler
>you need, the old jar is outdated and I am using new API for the June
>release.
>
>Look at Alex's last commits, you w
Did you rebuild the compiler? There is a new version of the GCC compiler
you need, the old jar is outdated and I am using new API for the June
release.
Look at Alex's last commits, you will see he updated the build.
Mike
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
> I was rebasing
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
> Yep, would like to see private / protected constructors, method
> overloading, generics and lambda in falcon to overwhelm any competitor :-)
>
I wish I got paid doing this because I would take 3 months of my life and
learn the low level
I was rebasing my branch on develop and now the compilation fails in
ReferenceCompiler
options.setParseJsDocDocumentation(true);
options.setExternExports(false);
options.addCustomPass(CustomPassExecutionTime.BEFORE_OPTIMIZATIONS,
new CollectTypesPass(model
Yep, would like to see private / protected constructors, method overloading,
generics and lambda in falcon to overwhelm any competitor :-)
I've been trying time ago for private / protected constructors using class
annotation in the compiler, I wasn't far but lost all my job with my computer
:-(
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
> Btw, what happen when you compile JS.swc stuffs in AS ?
>
Yeah, the only reason for the JS.swc is code completion and compile API.
You know, just tricks the compiler into thinking JS DOM calls are
actionscript and does correct type chec
Ah ok, so, you answer my question :-)
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 11:35:25 -0400
> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> Yes, you catch my dri
Yes, you catch my drift, we need a new output type(PLAINJS) that only runs
the compiler(to make AST from ActionScript) and the emitter to produce the
js, no GCC, no SWF etc.
Mike
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
> > No, no more subclasses what I meant to say is if the ou
Btw, what happen when you compile JS.swc stuffs in AS ?
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 16:31:32 +0100
>
>> No, n
> No, no more subclasses what I meant to say is if the output type is JS, the
> client compiler will automatically configure the FlexJS emitter based on
> the fact it wants to produce clean JS.
I'm fine with that approach as the FLEXJS_DUAL output type re-invokes the
compiler after the swf compil
No, no more subclasses what I meant to say is if the output type is JS, the
client compiler will automatically configure the FlexJS emitter based on
the fact it wants to produce clean JS.
Mike
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Michael Schmalle <
teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Ju
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
> > I really want to try the JS.swc in this new build. :)
>
> Oh yes, I don't want to miss that either, big up for you too Mike !!
>
I'm not kidding myself, there is still a huge amount of work to be done to
get it to work correctly based
> I really want to try the JS.swc in this new build. :)
Oh yes, I don't want to miss that either, big up for you too Mike !!
Thanks,
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 11:06:59 -0400
> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ In
> Great job Fred, so this means we just need the FlexJS SDK and it will work
> right?
Yes :-)
1- We don't have to setup an external tool for the compilation, we can now
directly, make, build, compile swf / swc / js, even in one same build using
-js-output-type=FLEXJS_DUAL and we can use also
Great job Fred, so this means we just need the FlexJS SDK and it will work
right? Do we still have to setup a library for code completion etc.?
I really want to try the JS.swc in this new build. :)
Mike
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> I understand what y
Hi Alex,
I understand what you did but not sure I could reproduce, I wasn't that far in
my experiment but I still miss the complete round trip logic of jBurg, I guess
I would need to spend more time on it to get it better.
Whatever, that's awesome, we can now compile and debug without any depen
Awesome Chris! Thanks for doing this.
:)
Carlos
El viernes, 12 de junio de 2015, Alex Harui escribió:
>
>
> On 6/12/15, 9:05 AM, "Christofer Dutz" > wrote:
>
> >Hi Alex,
> >
> > well the flex-maven-plugin and the flex-sdk-converter both are maven
> >related, but don't have much in common. I was
29 matches
Mail list logo
