I was rebasing my branch on develop and now the compilation fails in 
ReferenceCompiler

        options.setParseJsDocDocumentation(true);
        options.setExternExports(false);

        options.addCustomPass(CustomPassExecutionTime.BEFORE_OPTIMIZATIONS,
                new CollectTypesPass(model, jscompiler));
        options.addCustomPass(CustomPassExecutionTime.BEFORE_OPTIMIZATIONS,

I've got only that in JXCompilerOptions:

public class JXCompilerOptions extends CompilerOptions
{

    private static final long serialVersionUID = 2021530437904249081L;

    public JXCompilerOptions()
    {
        super();
        
        declaredGlobalExternsOnWindow = false;
    }
    
}

any clue ?

Frédéric THOMAS


----------------------------------------
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 15:44:25 +0100
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> I understand what you did but not sure I could reproduce, I wasn't that far 
> in my experiment but I still miss the complete round trip logic of jBurg, I 
> guess I would need to spend more time on it to get it better.
>
> Whatever, that's awesome, we can now compile and debug without any 
> dependencies on the Flex SDK in IntelliJ :-) big up !!
>
> I will commit soon what I've done too.
>
> Thanks,
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
>> Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 22:19:47 +0000
>>
>> OK, I think I got it. Try my latest commit.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 6/12/15, 12:41 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>>OK, I will work on it. Thanks for trying, it is rather strange stuff.
>>>
>>>On 6/12/15, 9:16 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi Alex,
>>>>
>>>>Well, I've been trying to get why I always get a cost "not feasible" for
>>>>your function but I'm failing to understand the logic of jBurg, maybe
>>>>seing your solution will unligthen me but at the moment I'm totally in
>>>>the dark.
>>
>
                                          

Reply via email to