On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > I really want to try the JS.swc in this new build. :) > > Oh yes, I don't want to miss that either, big up for you too Mike !! > I'm not kidding myself, there is still a huge amount of work to be done to get it to work correctly based on externals that are more complicated then the ones I did right now. I think I managed to get packages(js namespaces) working but I really haven't tested them. On top of this, the FlexJS emitter needs a bunch of configuration added through it's emitter stage (to not produce GCC comments, inherits etc). What will probably happen is there will just be a JS output type that subclasses the FlexJS emitter and turns everything off, then it's not a rats nest of config arguments. Mike > > Thanks, > Frédéric THOMAS > > > ---------------------------------------- > > Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 11:06:59 -0400 > > Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > > > Great job Fred, so this means we just need the FlexJS SDK and it will > work > > right? Do we still have to setup a library for code completion etc.? > > > > I really want to try the JS.swc in this new build. :) > > > > Mike > > > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Frédéric THOMAS < > webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Alex, > >> > >> I understand what you did but not sure I could reproduce, I wasn't that > >> far in my experiment but I still miss the complete round trip logic of > >> jBurg, I guess I would need to spend more time on it to get it better. > >> > >> Whatever, that's awesome, we can now compile and debug without any > >> dependencies on the Flex SDK in IntelliJ :-) big up !! > >> > >> I will commit soon what I've done too. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Frédéric THOMAS > >> > >> > >> ---------------------------------------- > >>> From: aha...@adobe.com > >>> To: dev@flex.apache.org > >>> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ > Integration > >>> Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 22:19:47 +0000 > >>> > >>> OK, I think I got it. Try my latest commit. > >>> > >>> -Alex > >>> > >>> On 6/12/15, 12:41 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>>OK, I will work on it. Thanks for trying, it is rather strange stuff. > >>>> > >>>>On 6/12/15, 9:16 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>Hi Alex, > >>>>> > >>>>>Well, I've been trying to get why I always get a cost "not feasible" > for > >>>>>your function but I'm failing to understand the logic of jBurg, maybe > >>>>>seing your solution will unligthen me but at the moment I'm totally in > >>>>>the dark. > >>> > >> > >> > >
