I think we can do a partial implementation by preprocessing and renaming
functions without runtime changes, but it will have limitations like using
["functionName"]() syntax won't work.
On 1/22/14 10:22 PM, "Avi Kessner" wrote:
>Does function overloading require changes to the runtime?
>On Jan 2
Does function overloading require changes to the runtime?
On Jan 22, 2014 9:30 PM, "Gordon Smith" wrote:
> I looked over the spec to refresh my memory. In addition to user-defined
> namespaces, other things that were dropped were E4X, undefined, prototypes,
> and dynamic classes. Basically, AS4 b
I can see it.
Thank you, Justin !!
2014/1/23 Justin Mclean
> Hi,
>
> I think your issue got recorded:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34057
>
> Justin
>
Summary/Issues not visible for me either
On 23/01/2014 05:34, Shigeru Nakagaki wrote:
Hello
I created an issue. Then I can not see any issues at all.
It said "An unknown error occurred while trying to perform a search."
thanks
Shigeru Nakagaki
--
Lee Burrows
ActionScripter
Hi,
I think your issue got recorded:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34057
Justin
Hi,
Looks like JIRA is having a few issues, I'm sure infra know and are working on
it and it will be back shortly.
Thanks,
Justin
Hello
I created an issue. Then I can not see any issues at all.
It said "An unknown error occurred while trying to perform a search."
thanks
Shigeru Nakagaki
Awesome. I will try that out when I get a chance.
On 1/22/14 5:33 PM, "Darrell Loverin" wrote:
>Found an example in the falcon compiler of using soft dependencies. In
>org.apache.flex.compiler.config.Configuration,
>the below code says -locale must be set before -library-path.
>
>
>@Config(
Found an example in the falcon compiler of using soft dependencies. In
org.apache.flex.compiler.config.Configuration,
the below code says -locale must be set before -library-path.
@Config(allowMultiple = true, isPath = true)
@Mapping({"compiler", "library-path"})
@Arguments(Argument
Hi,
> Definitely looking for ideas for what to do about this. I think more
> folks have to get this far so they can offer their opinions.
Different logos for each product? At the very least the name should change.
> That's because the log is now effectively the ant output. Does it need to
> be
Thanks. Nice to know it worked for someone else besides me.
The Flex SDK install still uses the old code paths so the fact it works
just means I haven't busted anything. I hope to finish the ant script for
the Flex SDK later this week.
Other comments in-line.
On 1/22/14 3:55 PM, "Justin Mclean
Hi,
Installer works on OSX 10.9 as far as I can see for Apache Flex SDK and Flex JS.
There a few minor issues:
- Not defaulting to the latest FP and AIR versions
- FlexJS says it installing Apache Flex 4.0.1
- FlexJS progress bar go outside of window bounds
- FlexJS steps seem a bit arbitrary wit
OK, does the app disappear after the crash? I'm wondering what is in the
log.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 1/22/14 2:47 PM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
>Seems to crash when download FalconJX Dependencies (step 12?),
>
>
>2014/1/22 Alex Harui
>
>> I don't think the attachment made it. Maybe open a JIRA issue
Seems to crash when download FalconJX Dependencies (step 12?),
2014/1/22 Alex Harui
> I don't think the attachment made it. Maybe open a JIRA issue and attach
> it there?
>
> Can you tell from the progress bar what step it is in? Also check memory
> consumption. I've seen it run out of memor
That would be worth a try.
On 1/22/14 2:38 PM, "Chris Martin" wrote:
>In the meantime, I can just manually set it to expressInstall.swf in the
>wrapper to get it to work okay?
>
>
>On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Chris Martin wrote:
>
>> Ahh okay, thanks.Today i'm actually trying to get Flash
I don't think the attachment made it. Maybe open a JIRA issue and attach it
there?
Can you tell from the progress bar what step it is in? Also check memory
consumption. I've seen it run out of memory unpacking the AIR SDK.
Thanks,
-Alex
From: Carlos Rovira
mailto:carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.
In the meantime, I can just manually set it to expressInstall.swf in the
wrapper to get it to work okay?
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Chris Martin wrote:
> Ahh okay, thanks.Today i'm actually trying to get Flash Builder 4.7
> working. I think I still had the beta installed on this computer
Ahh okay, thanks.Today i'm actually trying to get Flash Builder 4.7
working. I think I still had the beta installed on this computer, and the
beta has long since ended :) Now I'm in this odd mode of not being able to
apply the license key. But then again I probably need to get the release
install
Okay, the formatting is a new behavior compared to 4.6
Thanks Alex
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> There was some different behavior in NumericStepper in 4.10 and maybe
> 4.9.1, but 4.11.0 should be working like 4.6. Now if the way it works
> isn't desirable, that's still
Hi,
I try it on Mavericks (FlexJS, FP12, AIR 4.0) two times, but both times it
crash. I attached the crash osx log.
It's very strange since it crash at 50-60% always
2014/1/22 Alex Harui
> When you say it crashed, did it close the installer? If not, try seeing
> if you display the log.
>
>
On 1/22/14 2:05 PM, "Chris Martin" wrote:
>
>Basically I know we are no longer using playerProductInstaller.swf and are
>now using expressInstall.swf. The expressInstall.swf file does get build
>out in the debug and release build folders just fine, but i'm not seeing a
>reference to it in the
There was some different behavior in NumericStepper in 4.10 and maybe
4.9.1, but 4.11.0 should be working like 4.6. Now if the way it works
isn't desirable, that's still worth a JIRA issue to track it.
-Alex
On 1/22/14 1:07 PM, "Chris Martin" wrote:
>Hey everyone,
>
>I logged this ticket yeste
When you say it crashed, did it close the installer? If not, try seeing
if you display the log.
On 1/22/14 1:08 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>I installed 4.11 successfully as well, but... When I tried to install
>FlexJS, it showed version number 4.0.1, some weird progress bars (too
>long, off scr
So I've decided to finally move from Flex 4.6 to the latest Apache Flex
4.11.0. I noted an oddity in my html template file being generated. Well,
it might not be an oddity, I might just not understand how this wrapper
works in detail.
Basically I know we are no longer using playerProductInstalle
I recently upgraded my mac to 10.9 by way of purchasing a new mac, not
upgrading an existing. I installed all the usual XCode, FlashBuilder 4.7,
etc. I noticed that I cannot debug anything on the desktop through ADL.
It just sticks at 57%. I am also unable to debug web apps. The only type
of d
As an update to this, I have the security turned on for Flash Builder 4.7
which does allow me to debug directly onto the iOS simulator, but I still
cannot debug in the AIR simulator. I have a desktop app as well and I can't
connect to the debugger there at all.
--
View this message in context:
I recently upgraded my mac to 10.9 by way of purchasing a new mac, not
upgrading an existing. I installed all the usual XCode, FlashBuilder 4.7,
etc. I noticed that I cannot debug anything on the desktop through ADL.
It just sticks at 57%. I am also unable to debug web apps. The only type
of d
I installed 4.11 successfully as well, but... When I tried to install
FlexJS, it showed version number 4.0.1, some weird progress bars (too
long, off screen) and eventually it crashed the installer (OS X
latest, AIR 4).
I'll try to reproduce tomorrow, maybe catch some more details.
EdB
On Wed,
Hey everyone,
I logged this ticket yesterday thinking there was a bug because of the odd
highlighting behavior that would happen. Namely if you have a
highlighted value of 999 in a numeric stepper and increment it via a
button. Then only the first 3 characters are highlighted. It looked
especial
I was able to run the installer without any problems except I forgot to
un-install the previous version. This gave me the generic, "Sorry, an
error has occurred" dialog. I had to think for a couple of minutes about
what this meant, then I remembered I had to un-install the previous
version.
I inst
Hi,
I just posted a pre-release build of the new Apache Flex Installer to
http://people.apache.org/~aharui/Installer/
There is a .dmg for Mac users and an .exe for Windows. I don't have a way
to create Linux installers right now. The installer will hopefully become
the way you install any Apach
I looked over the spec to refresh my memory. In addition to user-defined
namespaces, other things that were dropped were E4X, undefined, prototypes, and
dynamic classes. Basically, AS4 became more like Java and less like Javascript.
Dropping any of these things would have a large impact on Flex.
> the main thrust of the language was a totally new language geared for
> functional programming, and then some backward compatibility stuff to make it
> seem more like ActionScript.
I wouldn't characterize it that way. To me it felt like incremental change to
AS3. There were still classes an
On 1/22/14 10:55 AM, "Gordon Smith" wrote:
>Adobe designed AS4 to be the language for a new Flash runtime ("V12")
>that it was working on but dropped. (I was working on the AS4 compiler
>then.) Not all features of AS4 can be implemented -- at least not easily
>and efficiently -- on the existing
> Assuming it wasn't in the same direction as ASC 2 which started getting rid
> of things we use.
If I recall correctly, the biggest feature that was dropped was
developer-defined namespaces. I think AS4 just had
public/private/protected/internal. So there would be no more mx_internal.
> Not a
Adobe designed AS4 to be the language for a new Flash runtime ("V12") that it
was working on but dropped. (I was working on the AS4 compiler then.) Not all
features of AS4 can be implemented -- at least not easily and efficiently -- on
the existing Flash runtime. However, some features can be.
Well using the assumption that AS 4 would be an improvement in some area's
from AS3 even if it was an incomplete work. While I haven't looked at it yet,
I would be interested in just seeing the differences and bring over small
pieces that could be an improvement for us. Assuming it wasn't
You can create a "soft dependency" from one configuration variable to
another and get the same effect as this code. I don't have the code in
front of me right now but there should be some examples in the
Configuration classes of the old MXML compiler. In this case library-path
would have a soft dep
I'm not sure what the rules are. The language reference is under Apache
license. The specifications are under CC-NC which is not good. I suppose
I could try to get that changed.
But first, come up with something you do want to cherry pick that doesn't
require implementation in the runtime.
-Al
On 1/22/14 7:49 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>At least as the default. No harm in also offering legacy version(s).
But more work if you are suggesting that the release manager has to
produce convenience binaries in both Java 6 and Java 7. The installer
probably also has to change, and it is anot
Since this is hosted publicly but not donated, I assume we cannot cherry pick
any good changes from as4...
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: bkelley [mailto:brady.kel...@cleantelligent.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:15 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: ActionScript 4? What
Thanks for the info, Brady.
Well the good news is we don't have to start from the ground up to rewrite the
Flex framework.
DarkStone
2014-01-23
At 2014-01-23 00:15:24,bkelley wrote:
>DarkStone wrote
>> I believe Adobe said in the flash runtime roadmap that AS4 was dropped:
>> http://www.adobe
DarkStone wrote
> I believe Adobe said in the flash runtime roadmap that AS4 was dropped:
> http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplatform/whitepapers/roadmap.html
>
> Now they reopen AS4 on GitHub, what does it mean?
>From the read me on the github project: "Adobe is publishing the
ActionScript 4 spe
Also, because most (if not all) components in the 'experimental'
namespace don't have the same exhaustive set of Mustella tests, we
have no way of guaranteeing their continued quality when changes are
made to other parts of the SDK... So, until a component gets a
comprehensive Mustella test suite,
I think it's the other way: IMO, it was decided to use a different namespace
so that developers immediately know that these are "special" components, and
don't have the same expectations.
this was supposed to outweigh the inconvenience of changing namespaces.
HTH
Maurice
-Message d'origi
At least as the default. No harm in also offering legacy version(s).
EdB
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Tom Chiverton wrote:
> We should be setting an example and moving to something that isn't full of
> holes :-)
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 22/01/2014 15:37, Alex Harui wrote:
>>
>> I'm ok with that, b
We should be setting an example and moving to something that isn't full
of holes :-)
Tom
On 22/01/2014 15:37, Alex Harui wrote:
I'm ok with that, but an alternate plan is just to have Jenkins run Java
6.
If components are promoted to top level library,people will need to update
their code to update namespaces
Do you think it could be a problem?
2014/1/22 Maurice Amsellem
> Actually, experimental component have their own namespace:
> http://flex.apache.org/experimental/ns , with no predefined p
On 1/22/14 3:44 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote:
>On 22/01/2014 09:52, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>> IF we need two separate builds for the binaries, I can set it up.
>> Either on thebuilds@a.o machine
>I think that would be best. Then at least we'll know if we broke
>something :-)
I'm ok with that, but a
Actually, experimental component have their own namespace:
http://flex.apache.org/experimental/ns , with no predefined prefix (no
design.xml file)
But this is not documented very well , if at all.
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : carlos.rov...@gmail.com [mailto:carlos.rov...@gmail.c
Flex JS is a good approach to some kind of Flex projects, but a lot of
projects are not to be translated to JS at all... Then... We better think
about a FLEX 5 release out the way JS bullshit world...
2014/1/22 Miguel Ferreira
> Silly ideas are always good ideas
> Let s see where this take
Hi,
maybe this was discussed at some time, but I'd want to know what's the
general thinking about experimental library namespace.
Since new experimental components are based on Spark arquitecture, I'd
expect they use the spark prefix (i.e:
But "spark.components.*" are the spark default package
On 22/01/2014 09:52, Erik de Bruin wrote:
IF we need two separate builds for the binaries, I can set it up.
Either on thebuilds@a.o machine
I think that would be best. Then at least we'll know if we broke
something :-)
Tom
One side note. You should be able to have different versions of Java
installed.
-Mark
Hi Avi,
Well I submitted a proposal for a Tutorial in which I would do this as a
Hands-on session,
but I guess I'll also submit a talk with a Brief overview of that as I guess
this would be more Promotion for using Flex in enterprises.
Chris
Von: Avi Ke
No I'm on Win7 64bit and using Java 1.7 for a while now.
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 6:34 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java 1.6
Hi,
I been compiling with Java 1.7 for about a year on OSX and not run
Christopher, I think that is a topic that needs much more coverage. Great
idea!
On Jan 21, 2014 1:06 PM, "Christofer Dutz"
wrote:
> Reconcidering my last Statement ...
>
> As Maven, Flex, BlazeDS, FlexUnit are all Flex and Apache Technologies (or
> BlazeDS will be pretty soon) ... eventually a t
IF we need two separate builds for the binaries, I can set it up.
Either on the builds@a.o machine (which I think has the option for
both Java versions), or on the Mustella VM.
EdB
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> Well I use Flexmojos in a lot of Projects being built w
Silly ideas are always good ideas
Let s see where this take us, Flex 5 vs Flex JS? or Flex 5 will be Flex JS?
We can enter in a some conspiracy theories that that was always the plan of
Adobe :)
But with some new fresh blood in the web maybe will be also good for the flex
project...
> Subjec
Adobe just committed AS4 specifications and related documents to GitHub:
https://github.com/adobe-research/ActionScript4?files=1
I believe Adobe said in the flash runtime roadmap that AS4 was dropped:
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplatform/whitepapers/roadmap.html
Now they reopen AS4 on GitHub
60 matches
Mail list logo
