IF we need two separate builds for the binaries, I can set it up. Either on the builds@a.o machine (which I think has the option for both Java versions), or on the Mustella VM.
EdB On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > Well I use Flexmojos in a lot of Projects being built with Java 7, the only > Thing is that the build of Flexmojos itself seems to fail because of some > incompatabilities in some APIs ... I'll investigate this Problem. > > Chris > ________________________________________ > Von: webdoublefx <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Januar 2014 00:17 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: RE : RE : Java 1.6 > > Im still not clear with the impact of the built sdk on application and I > maybe mis understood for FM but thought it was ok to use it but not to built > it only. > > Thanks. > > > Envoyé depuis un mobile Samsung > > <div>-------- Message d'origine --------</div><div>De : Carlos Rovira > <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> </div><div>Date :21/01/2014 23:08 > (GMT+00:00) </div><div>A : dev@flex.apache.org </div><div>Objet : Re: RE : > Java 1.6 </div><div> > </div> > Right, people using flexmojos, java on server side and so on with Java 6 > will have to migrate all to get all the system in the same version of Java. > But it implies changes to flexmojos to get working with Java 7 (as Chris > said). Maybe people could opt for a gradual migration and start only with > flex, and they eventually can have problems with their departments if the > migration plan is not solid. > > I think it's clear that Java 7 should be conquered, but maybe java 6 should > stay here for a while to avoid disruptive escenarios... > > > 2014/1/21 webdoublefx <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > >> Velocity is the only dependency have seen which made the build failed at >> the moment. >> >> @Carlos, what kind of impact could it be on client applications ? I can >> figure out some issues for FM / IDEs which uses the built java modules but >> not for client app. >> >> >> Envoyé depuis un mobile Samsung >> >> <div>-------- Message d'origine --------</div><div>De : Gordon Smith < >> gosm...@adobe.com> </div><div>Date :21/01/2014 22:35 (GMT+00:00) >> </div><div>A : dev@flex.apache.org </div><div>Objet : RE: Java 1.6 >> </div><div> >> </div> >> Carlos, suppose it turns out that we can't be compatible with both 6 and >> 7. (I hope that's not the case, but I don't think we know yet.) Are you >> saying we have to stick with 6? Rather than do that, we should probably >> instead have two branches and two builds if we can't have compatibility >> with both. >> >> - Gordon >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: carlos.rov...@gmail.com [mailto:carlos.rov...@gmail.com] On Behalf >> Of Carlos Rovira >> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 2:03 PM >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Java 1.6 >> >> I'd like to go Java 7, but in my case we have products in Java 6 that >> can't be upgraded right now. I suppose that many people are in the same >> situation. So I think compatibility with Java 6 is a must. >> >> >> 2014/1/21 Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com> >> >> > We should definitely fix the problems that make us incompatible with >> > Java 7, and then make that our recommended version (and switch out >> > build systems). But staying compatible with Java 6, if that's >> > possible, would also be a good thing. >> > >> > - Gordon >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: aYo [mailto:a...@binitie.com] >> > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 11:41 AM >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > Subject: Re: Java 1.6 >> > >> > The future is Java 7+, but I think we need to be 6 compatible for a >> while. >> > There will be lots of teams out there that will not be pleased if >> > there is a sudden loss of support for 6. As you know, it can be >> > seriously disruptive >> > >> > On Tue 21 Jan 2014 20:35:55 WAT, Alex Harui wrote: >> > > More and more things are requiring Java 7. Java 6 standard support >> > > is over. Should we just move to Java 7 or do we need to remain Java >> > > 6 compatible? BTW, there appears to be errors when you try to get >> > > Flex to build on Java 7. I'm looking into it now. >> > > >> > > Thoughts? >> > > -Alex >> > > >> > >> > -- >> > *aYo* >> > www.ayobinitie.com >> > mrbinitie.blogspot.com >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> Carlos Rovira >> Director de Tecnología >> M: +34 607 22 60 05 >> F: +34 912 94 80 80 >> http://www.codeoscopic.com >> http://www.directwriter.es >> http://www.avant2.es >> > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > Director de Tecnología > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > F: +34 912 94 80 80 > http://www.codeoscopic.com > http://www.directwriter.es > http://www.avant2.es -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
