Same here:
Permission error on the download and the FB 4.7 location seems to be
"eclipse/plugins/com.adobe.flexbuilder.codemodel_4.7.0.349722"
???
EdB
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:50 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> Same here. Getting a "*Server Problem**Unknown server error.* Try again or
> c
Same here. Getting a "*Server Problem**Unknown server error.* Try again or
contact the server administrator."
Also, the folder in my FB installation
is eclipse\plugins\com.adobe.flexbuilder.codemodel_4.7.0.349722
This is on Windows 7, FB 4.7 64-bit
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:22 PM,
On 7/30/2013 1:04 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
Can a few folks try it so we know it works? I think it will only work
with FlashBuilder 4.7 (and not 4.6). Then we'll discuss what to do next.
just in case you don't already know, this issue shows up in FB4.6 & SDK 4.10.0
as well.
I have tried downloading the file.. but the browser says I have no permission..
Also in your readme the folder that is pointed to is:
eclipse/plugins/com.adobe.flash.codemodel_4.7.0.349722
But on my machine it is:
eclipse/plugins/com.adobe.flexbuilder.codemodel_4.7.0.349722
Regards,
SWEN VAN ZA
Even later update on the "New Project" issue:
I think I have successfully patched a jar in FlashBuilder to get around
this problem.
The patched jar and a readme is up on
http://people.apache.org/~aharui/FlashBuilder/
Can a few folks try it so we know it works? I think it will only work
with Fla
Latest update on the "New Project" issue:
I think I've found the offending code for real this time. There is code
for a version check that checks that the Flex version is less than 5.0.0
by doing:
major * 100 + minor * 10 + micro
This means that we don't have the option to change to Apa
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > So are you okay with calling this bug fixed? ;-)
> No sure it's fixed but not being able to trigger it is good enough for me.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
FWIW, Installer RC1 had this exact issue which I fixed in Installer RC2. I
have a
Hi,
> So are you okay with calling this bug fixed? ;-)
No sure it's fixed but not being able to trigger it is good enough for me.
Thanks,
Justin
Justin is correct in this..
We are using an older version of OSMF than what is currently available.
The version that ships with our version is compatible with the streaming
features that were introduced in FP 10.2, which did not include Multicast.
You need to remove the OSMF.swc from your app's
Hi,
I'm not that familiar with FM4 but what version of OSMF is is expecting? Apache
Flex uses 1.0 and it may be that your code is expecting a later version and
need to use a newer version of osmf.swf.
It looks like that class isn't in the current version of OSMF we use.
Running this:
./swfdump
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 7/29/13 11:32 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Justin Mclean
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> > You are mixing your RCs. Installer does not have an RC3 yet. Please
> >> > clarify?
> >>
> >> Sorry
On 7/29/13 11:32 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Justin Mclean
>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > You are mixing your RCs. Installer does not have an RC3 yet. Please
>> > clarify?
>>
>> Sorry by RC3 I mean current develop ie what will be RC3.
>>
>> Justin
>>
>
>So are
On 7/29/13 11:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>>>
>> >The user still needs to keep track of the index length chrome elements
>>and
>> >regular elements.
>> I don't think I'm understanding this.
>>
>
>If I want to add an element as a chrome, I will need to know the number of
>elements already
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I think FalconJS was going to generate something like:
>
> if (child != undefined &&
> child.$implements["org.apache.flex.core.IChrome"])
>
> Not sure what it was going to do for classes, maybe chase the prototype
> chain?
>
> The othe
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 11:24 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 7/28/13 2:20 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
> >>
> >> At this point, I'm liking flags better, but I'm still not decided.
> >>
> >>
> >Sounds like a good compromise. Although I am not sure if it solves the
> >issue of index managemen
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > You are mixing your RCs. Installer does not have an RC3 yet. Please
> > clarify?
>
> Sorry by RC3 I mean current develop ie what will be RC3.
>
> Justin
>
So are you okay with calling this bug fixed? ;-)
If so, I will go ahead w
I think FalconJS was going to generate something like:
if (child != undefined &&
child.$implements["org.apache.flex.core.IChrome"])
Not sure what it was going to do for classes, maybe chase the prototype
chain?
The other thing that occurred to me about $implements or child.is(IChrome)
is
Hi, first off I want to apologize if you feel this was posted to the wrong list
- it just seemed to me like an SDK issue rather than a general coding issue.
If you think I should post to the other list let me know and I will do so.
Using a custom OSMF player that implements a generic MediaFacto
Looking on it a second time, I guess you have to test it exists in there for
both, so maybe it's a moot issue.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Kessler CTR Mark J [mailto:mark.kessler@usmc.mil]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 1:43 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: [FlexJS] Handling
I've gotten used to being able to do Type checks with "is". It also stands
out as a different format visually. I think the only problem with that change
is, the child couldn't be null/undefined. It would have to be able to run that
method. Whereas the current "is" can compare the datatyp
Ah, the "is" issue.
We don't seem to be able to get out from under a 'helper' method (or
whatever the term-du-jour is for that thing) and a 'storage' property.
Personally I like to go from this AS:
if (child is IChrome)
to this JS:
if (child.is(IChrome))
That would make it relatively easy to
I think a written tutorial with good screenshots is a must. It's also easier to
update the text over the years if something changes.
But the video is definitely a plus and a good guide.
The video should be something like this:
Compiling and Contributing to Apache Flex with IntelliJ by Nicholas
Hi,
> You are mixing your RCs. Installer does not have an RC3 yet. Please
> clarify?
Sorry by RC3 I mean current develop ie what will be RC3.
Justin
On 29/07/2013 14:47, Justin Mclean wrote:
The README could probably do with an addition along the above lines.
Can I submit patches against trunk and/or develop yet or is the merging
still painful ?
Tom
>I am hoping we're going to release something other than RC3 which means we
>have a few more days before we would release. Here's my latest update on the
>3 issues:
>
>1) ResourceModule via FlashVars: Yes it affects a small population of the
>total Flex SWFs in the world, but at least two of f
On Jul 29, 2013 2:31 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I am not sure why it looks like it is downloading RC3 for you. Are
there
> > any specific combination of sdk/fp/air selections you are going through
to
> > hit this bug?
>
> Just tried and via the debugger with latest code and couldn't
Thanks for that. I'm more interested in the runtime use of interfaces.
What is the JS output for this AS?
if (child is IChrome)
It looked like FalconJS was going to create a $implements object on each
class and "is" code would test against that. What should we do for
FalconJX?
Thanks,
On 7/29/13 6:35 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote:
>On 29/07/2013 14:22, Krüger, Olaf wrote:
At a guess you've not installed the optional BazeDS/remoting
libraries.
>>> Ahh... I'm using the "RemoteObjects" to communicate with my PHP
>>>backend.
>>> Have I install the "BazeDS/remoting" in this
Hi,
The installer does state "Remoting support (optional)" and has the information:
"Apache Flex can optionally integrate with remoting providers like BlazeDS,
GraniteDS, WebORB, Red5, AMFPHP, RubyAMF, PyAMF and others. This feature
requires flex-messaging-common.jar from the Adobe Flex SDK. The
On 29/07/2013 14:22, Krüger, Olaf wrote:
At a guess you've not installed the optional BazeDS/remoting libraries.
Ahh... I'm using the "RemoteObjects" to communicate with my PHP backend.
Have I install the "BazeDS/remoting" in this case?
Yes, you must install the BlazeDS option for your applicati
This is the public link to my screenshot that was not attached in my email:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/8496144/swfinspector_starlingapacheflex_491.png
2013/7/29 Carlos Rovira
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to build Starling Framework with flexmojos 6.0.1 upgrading
> the starling pom from 4.6
Hi,
I was trying to build Starling Framework with flexmojos 6.0.1 upgrading the
starling pom from 4.6.0 to 4.9.1 and testing IntelliJ new Cardea EAP where
we finally get the fix to build with flexmojos Apache Flex SDK.
All seems to go ok and I get successful compilation in both ways: running
pom
Hi,
> I am not sure why it looks like it is downloading RC3 for you. Are there
> any specific combination of sdk/fp/air selections you are going through to
> hit this bug?
Just tried and via the debugger with latest code and couldn't reproduce.
Couldn't see any issues in the code either.
I ret
Great idea Jude! Simple and effective.
Rgs,
Sugan
-Original Message-
From: jude [mailto:flexcapaci...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 July 2013 05:41 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [REQUEST] A tutorial on how to fix bugs for the Flex SDK
I have a suggestion on this tutorial writing thing.
And behind door number three is:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?s=flex
;-)
EdB
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Dasa Paddock wrote:
> There's also a mirror on GitHub at:
> https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk
>
> --Dasa
>
> On Jul 27, 2013, at 12:27 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> wrote:
No harm done, I'm sure. And I want re-iterate that I strongly agree
that we shouldn't 'fake' version numbers to work around this issue. A
simple fix is available (changing to single digit version numbering)
and I'm sure we would never fix one IDE by knowingly breaking another.
EdB
On Mon, Jul 2
On 29.07.2013 12:43, Erik de Bruin wrote:
Alexander,
I appreciate your input and I agree that we shouldn't break other IDEs
to fix a FB issue. I would however, as a representative of the
producer of IntelliJ IDEA, be careful to publicly state that you like
best the solution that cripples Flash B
I concur as I use fb and fdt
aYo
www.ayobinitie.com
mrbinitie.blogspot.com
On 29 Jul 2013 09:44, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
> Alexander,
>
> I appreciate your input and I agree that we shouldn't break other IDEs
> to fix a FB issue. I would however, as a representative of the
> producer of IntelliJ
Alexander,
I appreciate your input and I agree that we shouldn't break other IDEs
to fix a FB issue. I would however, as a representative of the
producer of IntelliJ IDEA, be careful to publicly state that you like
best the solution that cripples Flash Builder.
EdB
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:33
On 27.07.2013 2:03, Alex Harui wrote:
For #2: The FB code is assuming that versions in flex-sdk-description.xml
are single digits, so 4.9 parses but 4.10 does not. I'm not sure there is
a way for us to hack FB with a patch, and I don't imagine I can get Adobe
to respond in the timeframe we want.
40 matches
Mail list logo
