I concur as I use fb and fdt aYo www.ayobinitie.com mrbinitie.blogspot.com On 29 Jul 2013 09:44, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> Alexander, > > I appreciate your input and I agree that we shouldn't break other IDEs > to fix a FB issue. I would however, as a representative of the > producer of IntelliJ IDEA, be careful to publicly state that you like > best the solution that cripples Flash Builder. > > EdB > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Alexander Doroshko > <alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com> wrote: > > On 27.07.2013 2:03, Alex Harui wrote: > >> > >> For #2: The FB code is assuming that versions in > flex-sdk-description.xml > >> are single digits, so 4.9 parses but 4.10 does not. I'm not sure there > is > >> a way for us to hack FB with a patch, and I don't imagine I can get > Adobe > >> to respond in the timeframe we want. What would be the negative impact > of > >> just lying about the version in flex-sdk-description.xml? We could also > >> rename the release to 4.9.5 or even go to 5.0.0. > > > > Please, don't lie in flex-sdk-description.xml. There's a lot of code > relying > > on this number in IntelliJ IDEA. I guess lying may cause unexpected > errors > > not only in our IDE, but in all other IDEs as well, even in Flash Builder > > itself. Any other solution is ok for IntelliJ IDEA. > > My personal choice would be 4.10 and a note in release notes. My 2nd > > preferred choice is 4.9.X. > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl >
