Alexander, I appreciate your input and I agree that we shouldn't break other IDEs to fix a FB issue. I would however, as a representative of the producer of IntelliJ IDEA, be careful to publicly state that you like best the solution that cripples Flash Builder.
EdB On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Alexander Doroshko <alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com> wrote: > On 27.07.2013 2:03, Alex Harui wrote: >> >> For #2: The FB code is assuming that versions in flex-sdk-description.xml >> are single digits, so 4.9 parses but 4.10 does not. I'm not sure there is >> a way for us to hack FB with a patch, and I don't imagine I can get Adobe >> to respond in the timeframe we want. What would be the negative impact of >> just lying about the version in flex-sdk-description.xml? We could also >> rename the release to 4.9.5 or even go to 5.0.0. > > Please, don't lie in flex-sdk-description.xml. There's a lot of code relying > on this number in IntelliJ IDEA. I guess lying may cause unexpected errors > not only in our IDE, but in all other IDEs as well, even in Flash Builder > itself. Any other solution is ok for IntelliJ IDEA. > My personal choice would be 4.10 and a note in release notes. My 2nd > preferred choice is 4.9.X. -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
