2589 6577
Russia: +7 495 641 4663
UK: +44 1793 402663
USA/Canada: +1 916 356 2663 or +1-888-875-9370
Bridge: 5
Conference ID: 1264677285
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: O'driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 10:22 AM
> To: dev
nks,
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 3:35 PM
> To: 'dev at dpdk.org'
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st
> October
>
>
At the recent DPDK Userspace event in Dublin, Mohammad Abdul Awal gave a brief
talk on the Hyperscan pattern match software. We said at the time that it
wasn't open sourced yet but it would be soon. It's now available at:
https://01.org/hyperscan and https://github.com/01org/hyperscan.
Tim
At the recent DPDK Userspace event we agreed that we need a body to make
technical decisions for the project. In Dublin we referred to this as a
Technical Steering Committee, but that term is often used on other projects to
describe a body with a more political charter. To avoid confusion, and
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 3:43 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Architecture Board Proposal
>
> Hi Tim,
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Neary [mailto:dneary at redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 7:49 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Architecture Board Proposal
>
> Thanks Tim,
>
> Great to see some momen
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Dave Neary
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 1:11 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Architecture Board Proposal
>
> Hi,
>
> On 10/30/2015
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 9:45 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK 2.2 roadmap
>
> Hello,
>
> The new features for the release 2.2 must be first submitted before 2nd
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:44 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK 2.2 roadmap
>
> 2015-09-09 12:56, O'Driscoll, Tim:
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Declan Doherty
> Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2016 1:10 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] aesni_gcm: PMD to support AES_GCM crypto
> operations
>
> This patch provides the implementation of
lto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 12:25 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] 16.11 Roadmap
>
> We were a little late doing this for 16.07, so we're going to try and
> communicate our roadmap for future releases
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bagh Fares
> Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 6:03 PM
> To: Dave Neary; CHIOSI, MARGARET T; Stephen Hemminger
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Pradeep Kathail (pkathail at cisco.com)
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Proposals from
> -Original Message-
> From: Pradeep Kathail [mailto:pkathail at cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 11:16 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; Bagh Fares; Dave Neary; CHIOSI, MARGARET T; Stephen
> Hemminger
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Proposa
There's been a lot of activity on the mailing list recently on DPDK support for
ARM. It's great to see the project being enhanced to embrace a new architecture.
We have seen some duplication of efforts on this, so we think it would make a
good topic for a community call. This will give everybody
want to make sure that we have agreement on the scope and purpose of the
board. We can address membership once we've finalized that.
Tim
> -----Original Message-
> From: O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 3:22 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: A
er 18, 2015 7:27 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: DPDK Community Call - ARM Support
>
> Tim, et al,
> Thanks for this call to the ARM community to convene to discuss
> what support is out there in ARM ecosystem. I am responsible for
> networ
ing is:
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/535221101. Further details on the meeting
time in other timezones, and dial-in numbers for various countries are included
below.
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent:
As we're nearing the completion of the 2.2 release, I'd like to start a
discussion on plans for 2.3. To kick this off, below are the features that
we're hoping to submit for this release.
If others are prepared to contribute their plans, then we could build a
complete view of the release which
We'd like to announce the release of the new DPDK project logo. Various
versions of the logo are available at: http://dpdk.org/about. This includes
horizontal and vertical versions, versions with and without Data Plane
Development Kit underneath, and versions suitable for a white or black
backg
This is just a reminder that on August 17 the DPDK open source community will
gather in San Francisco for the 2nd annual DPDK Summit. It's a one day event
where the community will share some of their developments, applications, and
usage of DPDK. The event will include talks from HP, IBM Asper
Those of you who have looked at the website for the event
(https://dpdksummit.com/us/en/userspace2015) will have seen that we're planning
to have 3 different types of presentations:
Standard presentation sessions:
- Scheduled for both Thursday and Friday mornings.
- Opportunity to present on a t
Hi Neil,
There have been a few deprecation notices like this one submitted. Since you
drove the ABI policy, it would be good to get confirmation from you that these
are compliant with the policy and that you don't see any issues. Ideally, it
would be great if you can review and ack them. If you
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier MATZ
> Sent: Monday, June 1, 2015 9:15 AM
> To: Zhang, Helin; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 01/18] mbuf: redefine packet_type in
> rte_mbuf
>
> Hi Helin,
>
> +CC Neil
>
> On 06/0
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Harvey (agh)
> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 3:10 AM
> To: Thomas Monjalon; Wang, Liang-min
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ethtool: add new library to provide
> ethtool-alike
As we're nearing the completion of the 16.04 release, I'd like to let the
community know our plans for 16.07. It would be good if others are also willing
to share their plans so that we can build up a complete picture of what's
targeted for 16.07.
These are the features that we're planning to s
We were a little late doing this for 16.07, so we're going to try and
communicate our roadmap for future releases earlier. Our aim is to do this 6
months before a release. Some things will obviously change during
planning/development, so we'll provide an update 4 months before the release.
Afte
Thanks to everybody who attended and provided input at last week's meeting. It
was a good, open discussion, and hopefully is the first step towards
structuring the DPDK project to facilitate its continued growth.
I've included a summary of the discussion below. Please feel free to provide
any a
At the end of each release, we typically hold a retrospective within our
development team to discuss what went well, what could be improved etc. For
16.04, we thought it would be a good idea to try doing this with the open
source community, so that everybody involved in the project can provide t
These are the features that we plan to submit for the 19.11 release:
Intel(r) Ethernet 810 Series Network Adapter Enhancements: Support for loading
of device-specific Dynamic Device Personalization (DDP) profiles to support new
protocols, rte_flow/flow director/switch filter updates to support D
These are the features that we plan to submit for the 19.08 release:
Intel(r) Ethernet 800 Series Network Adapter Enhancements: Enhancements to the
ICE and IAVF PMDs to support rte_flow, ethertype and tunnel filters, and inner
L3/L4 checksum strip/insertion for Intel(r) Ethernet 800 Series Netw
Below are the features that we're planning to submit for the 17.02 release.
We'll submit a patch to update the roadmap page with this info.
Some things will obviously change during planning/development, so we'll provide
a more detailed update in late September/early October. After that, things
Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 12:19 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
>
> At the community call we held on governance in De
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Monkman [mailto:Bob.Monkman at arm.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 4:30 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org; Laura Kempke; Michael Dolan
> Subject: RE: DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
>
> Thanks very much f
> -Original Message-
> From: announce [mailto:announce-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
> Monjalon
> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 3:15 PM
> To: announce at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-announce] call to join Linux Foundation
>
> After few meetings and emails, it has been agreed to
We're delighted to announce that the DPDK Summit USA 2016 will be held on
August 10th & 11th at The Tech Museum of Innovation (http://www.thetech.org),
San Jose.
The DPDK Summit events provide an opportunity for the DPDK community to meet
face-to-face and discuss the future direction of the pro
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Vincent JARDIN
> Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2016 11:41 AM
> To: moving at dpdk.org
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-moving] Draft Project Charter
>
> Tim,
>
> Thanks for your draft, but it
lab
and a lower level contribution for marketing purposes.
Tim
From: Matt Spencer [mailto:matt.spen...@arm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2016 6:18 PM
To: O'Driscoll, Tim ; Vincent JARDIN
; moving at dpdk.org
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] [dpdk-dev] Draft Project Charter
I
This email is being sent on behalf of: Cavium, Cisco, Intel, NXP & Red Hat.
Since its creation as an open source project in 2013, DPDK has grown
significantly. The number of DPDK users, contributors, commercial products that
use DPDK and open source projects that depend on it have all increased
alternative exception path to KNI that does not
require out of tree drivers. This work is still at an experimental stage, so it
may not be included in 17.02.
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Wedn
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
>
> Thanks Tim for the interesting inputs.
> Some of them may require a dedicated thread to continue the discussion
> based on some preliminary specifications or drafts.
Agreed. To avoid me acting as a middle man, I'm going to ask the
> -Original Message-
> From: announce [mailto:announce-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
> Monjalon
> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 12:30 AM
> To: announce at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-announce] important design choices - statistics - ABI
>
> Hi all,
>
> During the development of
After careful discussion with the Governing Board and Technical Board, we've
decided to cancel the Bay Area DPDK Summit planned for September 17-18.
After our successful DPDK Summit in Prague earlier this year, we definitely
intend to continue the DPDK Summit events. We'll be focusing on plans f
101 - 142 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
