Hi,
DPDK 1.8.0 removes the data pointer from the mbuf structure, such that the
start of the data in the segment buffer must be calculated (i.e. buf_addr +
data_off = 'data').
Given this, what is the best approach to set the mbuf data to NULL (previously
mbuf.data = NULL)?
As I see it, given a
Hi,
I build a switching application, which links against DPDK shared libraries;
when I run the application, I see throughput of X. I then build the
application again, except this time I link against DPDK shared libraries,
having modified the application's build parameters appropriately. In th
-Original Message-
From: Antti Kantee [mailto:po...@fixup.fi]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 5:37 PM
To: Kavanagh, Mark B; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Performance - linking against DPDK shared vs static
libraries
On 23/07/14 15:58, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
>> Hi,
&
Hi,
The l3fwd sample app contains the default values for the Intel(R) 82599 10 GbE
controller's RX and TX Prefetch, Host, and Write-back registers; said values
are used in the application to configure physical ports for optimal performance.
What values could be used to configure the physical po
Many thanks to all for your help.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Hall [mailto:mh...@mhcomputing.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 10:56 PM
To: Kavanagh, Mark B
Cc: Antti Kantee; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Performance - linking against DPDK shared vs static
libraries
On
Hi,
The recent reimplementation of rte_memcpy in DPDK v2.0.0 seems to have a placed
an implicit floor on the microarchitecture/Instruction set supported by DPDK.
For example, I can't compile head of OVS against DPDK 2.0 with gcc without
passing the 'msse3' flag; this points to an implicit minim
>-Original Message-
>From: Richardson, Bruce
>Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 5:05 PM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B
>Cc: dev at dpdk.org
>Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Minimum Supported x86 microarchitecture
>
>On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 03:09:39PM +, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
>From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yuanhan Liu
>Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 12:24 PM
>To: annou...@dpdk.org
>Subject: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-announce] DPDK 17.05.1 released
>
>Hi all,
>
>Here is a new stable release:
> http://fast.dpdk.org/rel/dpdk-17.05.1.tar.xz
>
>The git tree
>From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Qi Zhang
>Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 8:22 AM
>To: Wu, Jingjing
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; jianfeng.t...@intel.com; Zhang, Qi Z ;
>sta...@dpdk.org; Tan, Jianfeng
>Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix data segment buffer length
>
>Buffer lengt
>
>We, at Juniper Opencontrail have added software support for TCP send offload
>and receive
>offload to DPDK.
>
>If the community is interested, we can publish/upstream it.
>
>Pl let us know what you think of it.
Hi Kiran,
I'd be very interested in this, with a view to integrating your APIs int
>
>Hi All,
>
>
>I'm doing app debug and would like to see device PMD logs, e.g.
>dpdk/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c:1703
> PMD_RX_LOG(...)
Hi Yingzhi,
PMD_RX_LOG is defined in ixgbe_logs.h (see code snippet below).
#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_DEBUG_RX
#define
>
>Hi Liu,
>
>Yes agreed your comment. I will definitely remove the declaration as it is not
>really
>required.
> So the latest patch will look like this . Yes I did rush a bit to submit the
> patch last will
>correct my suite. So sending the patch in a reply if we have more comments we
>can tak
c const struct eth_dev_ops virtio_eth_dev_ops = {
> .promiscuous_disable = virtio_dev_promiscuous_disable,
> .allmulticast_enable = virtio_dev_allmulticast_enable,
> .allmulticast_disable= virtio_dev_allmulticast_disable,
>+ .mtu_set = virtio_mtu_set,
rn 0;
>+}
>@@ -677,7 +685,6 @@ static const struct eth_dev_ops virtio_eth_dev_ops = {
>? ??.allmulticast_enable = virtio_dev_allmulticast_enable,
>??? .allmulticast_disable??? = virtio_dev_allmulticast_disable,
>+?? .mtu_set = virtio_mtu_set,
>??? .dev_infos_ge
+ether_hdr_len));
>>+?? return -EINVAL;
>>+?? }
>>+ ??return 0;
>>+}
>>@@ -677,7 +685,6 @@ static const struct eth_dev_ops virtio_eth_dev_ops
>>= {
>>? ??.allmulticast_enable = virtio_dev_allmulticast_enable,
>>??? .allmulticast_disable??? = vi
>
>
Hi Souvik,
There are some very basic errors in this patch, particularly with respect to
format.
Review comments are inline - please address same and resubmit the patch. I also
recommend running $DPDK_DIR/utilities/checkpatch.py on any future submissions.
Thanks,
Mark
>
As a genera
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio
>
>On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 06:45:05PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:08:38 +
>> "Dey, Souvik" wrote:
>>
>> > Answers inline.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Regards,
>> > Souvik
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > Fr
Hi,
In OvS-DPDK, we support single mbuf-segment jumbo frames.
To date, we've supported this by creating a mempool containing mbufs of size
"~user-defined-MTU", and configured the NIC by crafting an rte_eth_conf
structure with jumbo_frame mode enabled, and the device's max_rx_pkt_len set
accord
>From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yuanhan Liu
>Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 2:08 PM
>To: dpdk stable
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org
>Subject: [dpdk-dev] 17.05.1 patches review and test
>
>Hi all,
>
>I'm doing an unexpected stable release, which is expected to be released
>in about two mont
>From: Hu, Jiayu
>Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 3:56 AM
>To: Ananyev, Konstantin
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Kavanagh, Mark B ; Tan, Jianfeng
>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] gso/lib: add TCP/IPv4 GSO support
>
>Hi Konstantin,
>
>Thanks for your important suggestions. My feedba
>From: Ananyev, Konstantin
>Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 10:59 AM
>To: Ananyev, Konstantin ; Kavanagh, Mark B
>; Hu, Jiayu
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Tan, Jianfeng
>Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/5] gso/lib: add TCP/IPv4 GSO support
>
>
>
>> -Original Message--
>From: Ananyev, Konstantin
>Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 11:49 AM
>To: Hu, Jiayu
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Kavanagh, Mark B ; Tan, Jianfeng
>
>Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/5] Support TCP/IPv4, VxLAN and GRE GSO in DPDK
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From:
>From: Ananyev, Konstantin
>Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 10:38 AM
>To: Hu, Jiayu
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Kavanagh, Mark B ; Tan, Jianfeng
>
>Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 2/5] gso: add TCP/IPv4 GSO support
>
>
>
>> > > +
>> > >
>From: Hu, Jiayu
>Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 2:00 AM
>To: Ananyev, Konstantin ; Kavanagh, Mark B
>
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Tan, Jianfeng
>Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 2/5] gso: add TCP/IPv4 GSO support
>
>Hi Konstantin,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From:
>From: Hu, Jiayu
>Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 7:07 AM
>To: Ananyev, Konstantin
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Kavanagh, Mark B ; Tan, Jianfeng
>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] gso: add TCP/IPv4 GSO support
>
>Hi Konstantin,
>
>On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 06:10:37AM +0800, Anany
>From: Ananyev, Konstantin
>Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 9:40 AM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; Hu, Jiayu
>
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Tan, Jianfeng
>Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 2/5] gso: add TCP/IPv4 GSO support
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: Kavanagh,
>From: Ananyev, Konstantin
>Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 10:11 AM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; Hu, Jiayu
>
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Tan, Jianfeng
>Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 2/5] gso: add TCP/IPv4 GSO support
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: Kavanagh,
>From: Hu, Jiayu
>Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 11:01 AM
>To: Ananyev, Konstantin ; Kavanagh, Mark B
>
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Tan, Jianfeng
>Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 2/5] gso: add TCP/IPv4 GSO support
>
>Hi Konstantin and Mark,
>
>> -Original Message-
>
Thanks for your comments Jiayu - please find responses inline.
Thanks,
Mark
From: Hu, Jiayu
>Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 4:13 AM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Tan, Jianfeng ; Ananyev, Konstantin
>; Yigit, Ferruh ;
>tho...@monjalon.net
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v5
>From: Ananyev, Konstantin
>Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 2:11 PM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Hu, Jiayu ; Tan, Jianfeng ;
>Yigit, Ferruh ; tho...@monjalon.net
>Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 1/6] gso: add Generic Segmentation Offload API
>framework
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Ananyev, Konstantin
>Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 2:36 PM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Hu, Jiayu ; Tan, Jianfeng ;
>Yigit, Ferruh ; tho...@monjalon.net
>Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 2/6] gso: add TCP/IPv4 GSO support
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Ananyev, Konstantin
>Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 2:32 PM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Hu, Jiayu ; Tan, Jianfeng ;
>Yigit, Ferruh ; tho...@monjalon.net
>Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 2/6] gso: add TCP/IPv4 GSO support
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Ananyev, Konstantin
>Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 3:12 PM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Hu, Jiayu ; Tan, Jianfeng ;
>Yigit, Ferruh ; tho...@monjalon.net
>Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 3/6] gso: add VxLAN GSO support
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Ananyev, Konstantin
>Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 3:16 PM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Hu, Jiayu ; Tan, Jianfeng ;
>Yigit, Ferruh ; tho...@monjalon.net
>Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 4/6] gso: add GRE GSO support
>
>
>
>From: Ananyev, Konstantin
>Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 3:49 PM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Hu, Jiayu ; Tan, Jianfeng ;
>Yigit, Ferruh ; tho...@monjalon.net
>Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 2/6] gso: add TCP/IPv4 GSO support
>
>> >> int
>> &
>-Original Message-
>From: Ananyev, Konstantin
>Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 3:12 PM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Hu, Jiayu ; Tan, Jianfeng ;
>Yigit, Ferruh ; tho...@monjalon.net
>Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 3/6] gso: add VxLAN GSO support
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Ananyev, Konstantin
>Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 4:09 PM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Hu, Jiayu ; Tan, Jianfeng ;
>Yigit, Ferruh ; tho...@monjalon.net
>Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 5/6] app/testpmd: enable TCP/IP
>-Original Message-
>From: Ananyev, Konstantin
>Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 5:27 PM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Hu, Jiayu ; Tan, Jianfeng ;
>Yigit, Ferruh ; tho...@monjalon.net
>Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 5/6] app/testpmd: enable TCP/IP
>From: Ananyev, Konstantin
>Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2017 2:23 PM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Hu, Jiayu ; Tan, Jianfeng ;
>Yigit, Ferruh ; tho...@monjalon.net
>Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 0/6] Support TCP/IPv4, VxLAN, and GRE GSO in DPDK
>
>Hi Mark,
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Ananyev, Konstantin
>Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2017 6:12 PM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Hu, Jiayu ; Tan, Jianfeng ;
>Yigit, Ferruh ; tho...@monjalon.net
>Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 0/6] Support TCP/IPv4, VxLAN, and GRE G
FYI - GSO series has been acked, so it will be included in DPDK v17.11 release.
-Mark
>-Original Message-
>From: Ananyev, Konstantin
>Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2017 11:24 PM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Hu, Jiayu ; Tan, Jianfeng ;
>Yigit, Ferruh ; t
>-Original Message-
>From: Ananyev, Konstantin
>Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2017 11:24 PM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Hu, Jiayu ; Tan, Jianfeng ;
>Yigit, Ferruh ; tho...@monjalon.net
>Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 0/6] Support TCP/IPv4, VxLAN
>-Original Message-
>From: Mcnamara, John
>Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 2:35 PM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Hu, Jiayu ; Tan, Jianfeng ;
>Ananyev, Konstantin ; Yigit, Ferruh
>; tho...@monjalon.net; Kavanagh, Mark B
>
>Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev]
>From: De Lara Guarch, Pablo
>Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 3:15 PM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: sta...@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh ;
>ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com; Kavanagh, Mark B
>Subject: RE: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/bnxt: fix compilation
>
>
>
>> -
>From: Yigit, Ferruh
>Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 6:34 PM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/bnxt: fix compilation
>
>On 10/9/2017 2:59 PM, Mark Kavanagh wrote:
>> As of 5ef3b79fdfe6f, compilation of DP
Hi,
This commit renders igb_uio unusable on Fedora 20, kernel version
3.19.8-100.fc20.x86_64.
During the build (make -j 20), a warning is issued for igb_uio regarding a
missing symbol (pci_msi_unmask):
WARNING: "pci_msi_unmask_irq"
[/home//x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/build/lib/librte_ea
>From: Mcnamara, John
>Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2017 4:29 PM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Hu, Jiayu ; Tan, Jianfeng ;
>Ananyev, Konstantin ; Yigit, Ferruh
>; tho...@monjalon.net; Kavanagh, Mark B
>
>Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: minor
>From: Yigit, Ferruh
>Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 3:50 AM
>To: Patrick MacArthur ; Markus Theil
>; dev@dpdk.org; Kavanagh, Mark B
>
>Cc: step...@networkplumber.org; Bob Noseworthy ; Patrick
>MacArthur ; O'Driscoll, Tim
>Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/6] igb_
Hi Maxime,
First off, apologies for the lateness of this reply - I realize that this patch
has already been upstreamed.
Unfortunately, during OvS-DPDK regression testing for DPDK v17.11-rc2 just
today, a regression involving vHost multiq was detected, and pinpointed to this
patch.
Version inf
>From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
>Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 3:35 PM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; y...@fridaylinux.org
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Maxime Coquelin ; Horton, Remy
>; Bie, Tiwei ; m...@redhat.com;
>jfrei...@redhat.com; vkapl...@redhat.com; jasow...@redhat.c
>From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coque...@redhat.com]
>Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 5:58 PM
>To: dev@dpdk.org; y...@fridaylinux.org; Kavanagh, Mark B
>; tho...@monjalon.net; ktray...@redhat.com
>Cc: Maxime Coquelin
>Subject: [PATCH] vhost: disable reply-ack protoco
>From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coque...@redhat.com]
>Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 8:38 PM
>To: dev@dpdk.org; y...@fridaylinux.org; Kavanagh, Mark B
>; tho...@monjalon.net; ktray...@redhat.com
>Cc: Maxime Coquelin
>Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] vhost: disable iommu support
>From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coque...@redhat.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2017 11:05 AM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; dev@dpdk.org;
>y...@fridaylinux.org; tho...@monjalon.net; ktray...@redhat.com
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] vhost: disable iommu support by default
>
>
our use case a data_len of 0 doesn't necessarily indicate a data value
of NULL.
Thanks,
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: Richardson, Bruce
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 4:50 PM
> To: Kavanagh, Mark B
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf: how to set
Hi Bruce,
I figured as much, thanks for confirming.
We'll probably go with a flag.
Thanks again,
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: Richardson, Bruce
> Sent: Monday, February 9, 2015 12:59 PM
> To: Kavanagh, Mark B
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] m
Hi,
Compilation of Open vSwitch fails when linked against current HEAD of DPDK
(f2552cd5).
The source of this issue appears to be commit ID 9144d6b: "eal/x86: optimize
memcpy for SSE and AVX", and can be resolved by passing an additional argument
to OVS when building same (CFLAGS="-march=nativ
>-Original Message-
>From: Mcnamara, John
>Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 12:57 AM
>To: Mcnamara, John; Kavanagh, Mark B; dev at dpdk.org
>Subject: RE: rte_memcpy.h: additional cflags required with OVS
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-
>-Original Message-
>From: Mcnamara, John
>Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 8:27 AM
>To: Qiu, Michael; Kavanagh, Mark B; dev at dpdk.org; Panu Matilainen
>Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] rte_memcpy.h: additional cflags required with OVS
>
>> -Original Message-
>---
> config/common_bsdapp| 6 --
> config/common_linuxapp | 6 --
> config/defconfig_ppc_64-power8-linuxapp-gcc | 2 -
> lib/Makefile| 1 -
> mk/rte.app.mk | 12
> mk/rte.lib.mk
>On 13/03/2015 10:49, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
>>> ---
>>> config/common_bsdapp| 6 --
>>> config/common_linuxapp | 6 --
>>> config/defconfig_ppc_64-power8-linuxapp-gcc | 2 -
>>> lib/Makefile
>-Original Message-
>From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Neil Horman
>Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 4:27 PM
>To: dev at dpdk.org
>Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] ABI: Add abi checking utility
>
>There was a request for an abi validation utilty for the ongoing ABI stabi
>-Original Message-
>From: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
>Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 11:49 AM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B
>Cc: dev at dpdk.org
>Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] mk: Remove combined library and related
>options
>
>On 13/03/2015 11:34, Kavanagh, Mark
>On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:56:59AM +0000, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
>>
>>
>> >-Original Message-
>> >From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Neil Horman
>> >Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 4:27 PM
>> >To: dev at dpdk.
>-Original Message-
>From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
>Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 2:59 PM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B
>Cc: dev at dpdk.org
>Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] ABI: Add abi checking utility
>
>On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 02:25:17PM +
Please disregard this patch - I'll push it again, this time with the correct
subject line format.
Apologies - Mark.
>
>- Fix vhost setup flags
>- Add minor edits to improve readability and consistency
>
>Signed-off-by: Mark Kavanagh
>---
> doc/guides/sample_app_ug/tep_termination.rst | 8 --
>
>Hi Mark,
Hi Jianfeng,
Thanks for your comments - I've responded inline.
Cheers,
Mark
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Mark Kavanagh
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 11:32 PM
>> To: dev at dpdk.org
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: fi
Please disregard - correct version of patch to follow.
Cheers,
Mark
>-Original Message-
>From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Mark Kavanagh
>Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 2:04 PM
>To: dev at dpdk.org
>Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2] doc: fix vhost setup in tep-terminatio
Please disregard this patchset - it was sent erroneously to the incorrect
mailing list.
I've already removed the related patches from Patchwork.
Cheers,
Mark
>-Original Message-
>From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Mark Kavanagh
>Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 3:30 PM
>
>On 11/24/2016 12:47 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/24/2016 01:33 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 09:30:49AM +, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> On 11/24/2016 06:31 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 04:53:05PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>
>Hi All,
> Is there any further comments or modifications required for this patch,
> or what next
>steps do you guys suggest here ?
Hi Souvik,
Some minor comments inline.
Thanks,
Mark
>
>--
>Regards,
>Souvik
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Dey, Souvik
>Sent: Saturday, October 1, 201
from next week.
Thanks,
Mark
>
>--
>Regards,
>Souvik
>
>-Original Message-
>From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Dey, Souvik
>Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 10:05 AM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; yuanhan.liu at
>linux.intel.com;
>stephen at
>
>On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 04:31:30PM -0400, Dey wrote:
>> /*
>> * dev_ops for virtio, bare necessities for basic operation
>> */
>> @@ -677,7 +685,6 @@ static const struct eth_dev_ops virtio_eth_dev_ops = {
>> .allmulticast_enable = virtio_dev_allmulticast_enable,
>> .allmultica
>-Original Message-
>From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 5:01 AM
>To: Kavanagh, Mark B
>Cc: Dey ; stephen at networkplumber.org; dev at dpdk.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio
>
>On
73 matches
Mail list logo
