On 30/05/2013 19:12, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The 82576 has known issues which require the write threshold to be set to 1.
> See:
> http://download.intel.com/design/network/specupdt/82576_SPECUPDATE.pdf
>
> If not then single packets will hang in transmit ring until more arrive.
> Simple te
On 30/05/2013 19:12, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> In many application there are no timers queued, and the call to
> rte_timer_managecan be optimized in that case avoid reading HPET and
> lock overhead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger
Reviewed-by: Vincent Jardin
It is a nice to have for perform
On 30/05/2013 19:12, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Both logging and calls to panic are never in the critical path.
> Use the GCC attribute cold to mark these functions as cold,
> which generates more optimised code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger
Reviewed-by: Vincent Jardin
It does not hurt to
On 30/05/2013 19:12, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> By default, DPDK based applications would only allow logging
> to syslog as "rte", DAEMON; but for any production application more
> control is desired to allow using actual application name and
> overriding the facility.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen He
Hi Stephen,
Overall this patch is very nice. My only comment on this one is why do
you limit the max number of memory resources to 5 ?
The PCI configuration space permits to store up to 6 base addresses.
> +#define PCI_MEM_RESOURCE 5
Please, can you add a log/comment with your patch, too ?
Che
On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:50:03 +0200
Damien Millescamps wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Overall this patch is very nice. My only comment on this one is why do
> you limit the max number of memory resources to 5 ?
> The PCI configuration space permits to store up to 6 base addresses.
>
> > +#define PCI_M
On 06/05/2013 05:49 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:50:03 +0200
> Damien Millescamps wrote:
>
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> Overall this patch is very nice. My only comment on this one is why do
>> you limit the max number of memory resources to 5 ?
>> The PCI configuration space perm
On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 20:05:15 +0200
Damien Millescamps wrote:
> On 06/05/2013 05:49 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:50:03 +0200
> > Damien Millescamps wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Stephen,
> >>
> >> Overall this patch is very nice. My only comment on this one is why do
> >> you limi
The code to do interrupts in the igb_uio is broken on later kernel versions
because pci_cfg_access_lock must not be used from interrupt context. But there
is
a much better way of doing all this now that a generic access to INTX
is available. Use pci_intx routines in later kernels, and provide back
9 matches
Mail list logo