Hi,
Thanks for the advises from you all.
The latest v7 patch has sent out.
Br,
Mou
On 2019/5/2 17:54, Pattan, Reshma wrote:
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Suanming.Mou
static void
+monitor_primary(void *arg __rte_unused) {
+ if
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Suanming.Mou
> static void
> +monitor_primary(void *arg __rte_unused) {
> + if (quit_signal)
> + return;
> +
> + if (rte_eal_primary_proc_alive(NULL))
> + rte_eal_alarm_set(MO
HI Suanming,
snipped
> >> /* true if x is a power of 2 */
> >> #define POWEROF2(x) x)-1) & (x)) == 0) @@ -413,6 +416,18 @@
> >> struct
> > Can we use ` RTE_IS_POWER_OF_2(n) ' instead of ` POWEROF2`?
>
> I'm sorry, but that line is not add by this patch this time.
>
> Maybe another commit
On 02-May-19 9:32 AM, Suanming.Mou wrote:
On 2019/5/2 16:04, Varghese, Vipin wrote:
Hi Suanming,
snipped
/* true if x is a power of 2 */
#define POWEROF2(x) x)-1) & (x)) == 0) @@ -413,6 +416,18 @@ struct
Can we use ` RTE_IS_POWER_OF_2(n) ' instead of ` POWEROF2`?
I'm sorry, but tha
On 2019/5/2 16:04, Varghese, Vipin wrote:
Hi Suanming,
snipped
/* true if x is a power of 2 */
#define POWEROF2(x) x)-1) & (x)) == 0) @@ -413,6 +416,18 @@ struct
Can we use ` RTE_IS_POWER_OF_2(n) ' instead of ` POWEROF2`?
I'm sorry, but that line is not add by this patch this time.
Hi Suanming,
snipped
>
> /* true if x is a power of 2 */
> #define POWEROF2(x) x)-1) & (x)) == 0) @@ -413,6 +416,18 @@ struct
Can we use ` RTE_IS_POWER_OF_2(n) ' instead of ` POWEROF2`?
> parse_val { }
>
> static void
> +monitor_primary(void *arg __rte_unused) {
> + if (quit_signal
When primary app exits, the residual running pdump will stop the
primary app to restart. Add pdump exits with primary support.
Signed-off-by: Suanming.Mou
---
Change in V6:
- remove "Suggested-by" tags and head line '.' in git log.
- adjust the rte_alarm.h head file position.
- add comment
7 matches
Mail list logo
