Hi Thomas,
In general looks good :), I'm going to test this serie and sounds good the
feedback from other developers, maybe I'm going to send a version number 9 in
order to get a good way together :)
Thanks :)
Mario.
From: Thomas Monjalon [thomas.monja..
On 12/03/2015 07:01 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard
> installation process while keeping compatibility with most of the old
> behaviours.
>
> v2 changes:
> - fix default build dir
> - RTE_TARGET subdir in $(sdkdir).
> - better ker
2015-12-03 15:26, Panu Matilainen:
> On 12/03/2015 07:01 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard
> > installation process while keeping compatibility with most of the old
> > behaviours.
> >
> > v2 changes:
> > - fix default build dir
>
2015-12-03 12:02, Thomas Monjalon:
> 2015-12-03 10:57, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:01:57AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard
> > > installation process while keeping compatibility with most of the old
> >
2015-12-03 10:57, Bruce Richardson:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:01:57AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard
> > installation process while keeping compatibility with most of the old
> > behaviours.
> >
> How compatible are we lo
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:06:41PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-12-03 12:02, Thomas Monjalon:
> > 2015-12-03 10:57, Bruce Richardson:
> > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:01:57AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard
> > >
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:02:42PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-12-03 10:57, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:01:57AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard
> > > installation process while keeping compatib
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:01:57AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard
> installation process while keeping compatibility with most of the old
> behaviours.
>
How compatible are we looking for here. The standard way of compiling up
Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard
installation process while keeping compatibility with most of the old
behaviours.
v2 changes:
- fix default build dir
- RTE_TARGET subdir in $(sdkdir).
- better kerneldir defaults
- fix dpdk_nic_bind symlink
- always install d
9 matches
Mail list logo