[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/12] standard make install

2015-12-03 Thread Arevalo, Mario Alfredo C
Hi Thomas, In general looks good :), I'm going to test this serie and sounds good the feedback from other developers, maybe I'm going to send a version number 9 in order to get a good way together :) Thanks :) Mario. From: Thomas Monjalon [thomas.monja..

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/12] standard make install

2015-12-03 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 12/03/2015 07:01 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard > installation process while keeping compatibility with most of the old > behaviours. > > v2 changes: > - fix default build dir > - RTE_TARGET subdir in $(sdkdir). > - better ker

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/12] standard make install

2015-12-03 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-12-03 15:26, Panu Matilainen: > On 12/03/2015 07:01 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard > > installation process while keeping compatibility with most of the old > > behaviours. > > > > v2 changes: > > - fix default build dir >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/12] standard make install

2015-12-03 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-12-03 12:02, Thomas Monjalon: > 2015-12-03 10:57, Bruce Richardson: > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:01:57AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard > > > installation process while keeping compatibility with most of the old > >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/12] standard make install

2015-12-03 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-12-03 10:57, Bruce Richardson: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:01:57AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard > > installation process while keeping compatibility with most of the old > > behaviours. > > > How compatible are we lo

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/12] standard make install

2015-12-03 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:06:41PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-12-03 12:02, Thomas Monjalon: > > 2015-12-03 10:57, Bruce Richardson: > > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:01:57AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard > > >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/12] standard make install

2015-12-03 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:02:42PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-12-03 10:57, Bruce Richardson: > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:01:57AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard > > > installation process while keeping compatib

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/12] standard make install

2015-12-03 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:01:57AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard > installation process while keeping compatibility with most of the old > behaviours. > How compatible are we looking for here. The standard way of compiling up

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/12] standard make install

2015-12-03 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard installation process while keeping compatibility with most of the old behaviours. v2 changes: - fix default build dir - RTE_TARGET subdir in $(sdkdir). - better kerneldir defaults - fix dpdk_nic_bind symlink - always install d