Hi Thomas, In general looks good :), I'm going to test this serie and sounds good the feedback from other developers, maybe I'm going to send a version number 9 in order to get a good way together :)
Thanks :) Mario. ________________________________________ From: Thomas Monjalon [thomas.monja...@6wind.com] Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 5:34 AM To: Panu Matilainen; Arevalo, Mario Alfredo C Cc: dev at dpdk.org; olivier.matz at 6wind.com; Richardson, Bruce Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] standard make install 2015-12-03 15:26, Panu Matilainen: > On 12/03/2015 07:01 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard > > installation process while keeping compatibility with most of the old > > behaviours. > > > > v2 changes: > > - fix default build dir > > - RTE_TARGET subdir in $(sdkdir). > > - better kerneldir defaults > > - fix dpdk_nic_bind symlink > > - always install doc if generated > > - doc > > - pkg/dpdk.spec > > > > Except for the minor nit about examples location (one could bikeshed on > things like these forever), seems fine to me and quick-n-dirty > conversion of my own spec didn't reveal any nasty surprises. > > It also appears more comprehensive and integrated with other workflows > than the competing patches so FWIW, you have my ACK :) Thank you. I'm going to send a v3. Mario, what is your opinion about this series?
