Thanks Daniel. I'm sure the many people who've put a lot of time and effort
into building DPDK will really appreciate your kind words.
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of daniel chapiesky
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 9:47 PM
> To: de
I generated the vhost example patch based on vhost library, but find there is
issue with --mergeable feature.
Only thousands of packets could be sent.
Then I tried the latest vhost example, which is just before my vhost lib
patch, I found that not only it has the issue
Which is fixed by the foll
Hi all,
After adding unmap uio resources operations in process signal handler functions,
An new error was found as follows:
Call Trace:
[] uio_release+0x40/0x60 [uio]
[] __fput+0xe9/0x270
[] fput+0xe/0x10
[] task_work_run+0xa7/0xe0
[] do_notify_resume+0x97/0xb0
[] int_signal+0x12/0x17
T
I just watched the closing remarks by Tim Driscol at the dpdk summit
http://youtu.be/r-JA5NBybrs
At time 4:30, he mentioned the "shock to the system" of developers
expecting a pat on the back and instead receiving critiques of their
code.
I realized that I was one of those who failed to
2014-10-13 11:46, Ouyang Changchun:
> Update max RX packet length since virtio PMD has the capability of receiving
> and transmitting jumbo frame.
>
> This following patch provides the above capability:
> [dpdk-dev,v3] virtio: Support mergeable buffer in virtio pmd
> Submitter Ouyang Changchun
> > At least on kernels 3.15 or newer, wrong compiler flags are set when
> > building
> > kernel modules.
> >
> > v2:
> > Remove unnecessary reset of CC when being included from the kernel.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
>
> Acked-by: Pablo de Lara
Applied
Thanks
--
Thomas
2014-10-15 14:08, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy:
> Linux kernel build system requires V=1 to enable verbose output, but
> current DPDK framework just check if V is defined.
>
> Fix: force V=1 when building Linux kernel modules if verbose output is
> enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
A
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jijiang Liu
> Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 6:56 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/8]librte_ether:add a common filter API
>
> Introduce a new filter framewok in librte_ether. As to
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 04:46:41PM -0400, daniel chapiesky wrote:
> At time 4:30, he mentioned the "shock to the system" of developers
> expecting a pat on the back and instead receiving critiques of their
> code.
>
> I realized that I was one of those who failed to acknowledge the incredible
> > This patch adds incoming packet error statistics in the i40e_ethdev.c file.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jijiang Liu
>
> Acked-by: Helin Zhang
Applied
Thanks
--
Thomas
Helin,
As you are in charge of i40e, here are 2 tips to acknowledge patches:
1) title should take this format:
i40e: add Rx error statistics
> Acked-by: Helin Zhang
2) This line should be added right after the Signed-off-by.
And the rest of the email (patch body) can be removed.
This w
Linux kernel build system requires V=1 to enable verbose output, but
current DPDK framework just check if V is defined.
Fix: force V=1 when building Linux kernel modules if verbose output is
enabled.
Signed-off-by: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
---
mk/rte.module.mk | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(
Linux kernel build system requires V=1 to enable verbose output, but
current DPDK framework just check if V is defined.
Fix: force V=1 when building Linux kernel modules if verbose output is
enabled.
Signed-off-by: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
---
mk/rte.module.mk | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(
Sergio,
I'd like to see a v2 patch with your explanations in commit log
and with a Signed-off-by.
> > - CROSS_COMPILE=$(CROSS)
> > + V=$(if $(V),1,0) CROSS_COMPILE=$(CROSS)
Minor nits:
- paren is not needed for one letter variable
- V option should go to the end to keep thing
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Sergio Gonzalez
> Monroy
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 2:08 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Set V=1 when building kernel modules
>
Self-NACK.
Please ignore as I forgot to add v2 pref
ME TOO, I HAVE A BUG WITH CAPS LOCK ;)
2014-10-15 11:06, Dey, Souvik:
> In DPDK1.6 do we support overlapped fragments while doing reassembly.
> Also why we don't consider the first or last fragment to be out-of-order.
> Are this known limitations in DPDK or they are not working due to some
> bugs
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 1:05 PM
> To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo; Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Pass verbose flag to kernel module
>
> Sergio,
>
> I'
Any plans to support this in future in DPDK fragmentation code ?
-Original Message-
From: Ananyev, Konstantin [mailto:konstantin.anan...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 5:49 PM
To: Dey, Souvik; Thomas Monjalon
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Patil, PraveenKumar
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] F
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Dey, Souvik
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 12:53 PM
> To: Thomas Monjalon
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Patil, PraveenKumar
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] FW: BUG in IP FRAGMENTATION
>
> We have not directly tried to
2014-10-15 09:47, Chen, Jing D:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > 2014-10-15 06:59, Chen, Jing D:
> > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > > > > enum rte_eth_rx_mq_mode {
> > > > > - ETH_MQ_RX_NONE = 0, /**< None of DCB,RSS or VMDQ
We have not directly tried to use the 1.7 code with fragmentation apis, but we
did run through the 1.7 code and did not find any much difference between 1.6
and 1.7 code.
I had wrongly mentioned out-of-order in my previous mail. Actually out-of-order
is working fine but we are facing issues wit
Hi Helin,
2014-09-19 03:43, Zhang, Helin:
> My idea on it could be,
> 1. Write a script to use ?setpci? to configure pci configuration.
> End user can decide which PCI device needs to be changed.
> 2. Add code to change that PCI configuration in i40e PMD only, as
> it seems nobody else
This patch adds incoming packet error statistics in the i40e_ethdev.c file.
Signed-off-by: Jijiang Liu
---
lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 11 +--
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
b/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
i
Fix one issue in virtio TX: it needs one more vring descriptor to hold the
virtio
header when transmitting packets, it is used later to determine whether to
free
more entries from used vring.
It fixes failing to transmit any packet with 1 segment in the circumstance of
only
1 descripto
Hi,
In DPDK1.6 do we support overlapped fragments while doing
reassembly. Also why we don't consider the first or last fragment to be
out-of-order. Are this known limitations in DPDK or they are not working due to
some bugs in the code ?
--
Regards,
Souvik
2014-10-15 06:59, Chen, Jing D:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > > enum rte_eth_rx_mq_mode {
> > > - ETH_MQ_RX_NONE = 0, /**< None of DCB,RSS or VMDQ mode */
> > > -
> > > - ETH_MQ_RX_RSS, /**< For RX side, only RSS is on */
> > > - ETH_MQ_RX_DCB, /**<
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Lilijun
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 10:43 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org; stephen at networkplumber.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] kernel panic when stop my test demo
>
> Hi all,
>
> After adding unmap uio r
2014-10-13 12:42, Zhan, Zhaochen:
> > It fixes the compile error as below on gcc version 4.3.4.
> > cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-unused-but-set-
> > variable"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Helin Zhang
>
> Tested-by: Zhaochen Zhan
Applied
Thanks
--
Thomas
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 4:11 PM
> To: Chen, Jing D
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6] ether: enhancement for VMDQ support
>
> 2014-10-15 06:59, Chen, Jing D:
> > From:
2014-10-15 11:11, Ouyang Changchun:
> Fix one issue in virtio TX: it needs one more vring descriptor to hold the
> virtio
> header when transmitting packets, it is used later to determine whether to
> free
> more entries from used vring.
> It fixes failing to transmit any packet with 1 se
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 10:25 PM
> To: Chen, Jing D
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/6] i40e: macaddr add/del enhancement
>
> 2014-09-23 21:14, Chen Jing D:
> > +
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 10:10 PM
> To: Chen, Jing D
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6] ether: enhancement for VMDQ support
>
> 2014-09-23 21:14, Chen Jing D:
> > The chan
Acked-by: Helin Zhang
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jijiang Liu
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 11:15 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Add Rx error statistics for Fortville
>
> This patch adds incoming packet erro
Hi Huawei,
I have v5 patch for this comment.
Thanks,
Changchun
> -Original Message-
> From: Xie, Huawei
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 12:26 AM
> To: Ouyang, Changchun; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] virtio: Fix vring entry number issue
>
>
>
> > -Original
Fix one issue in virtio TX: it needs one more vring descriptor to hold the
virtio
header when transmitting packets, it is used later to determine whether to
free
more entries from used vring.
It fixes failing to transmit any packet with 1 segment in the circumstance of
only
1 descripto
35 matches
Mail list logo
