A little late to the discussion but i definitely would recommend using
GitHub discussions. It allows for tracking/SEO of discussions so if there
are frequent questions/FAQs, they are easier to bubble up. For some of
the communities I help with, we’ve been actively moving more and more
discussion
INFRA issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-26151
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 7:29 PM Andy Grove wrote:
> Actually, no formal vote is needed, just proof of a mailing list
> discussion with consensus, so I will go ahead and request this.
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 7:25 PM Andy Grove wr
Actually, no formal vote is needed, just proof of a mailing list discussion
with consensus, so I will go ahead and request this.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 7:25 PM Andy Grove wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback so far. I will start a VOTE thread for this. I'll
> need to be able to link to a formal vot
Thanks for the feedback so far. I will start a VOTE thread for this. I'll
need to be able to link to a formal vote when requesting this feature.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 7:11 PM Renjie Liu wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 11:12 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon,
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 11:12 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 7:16 AM Andrew Lamb
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 in my opinion
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 9:50 AM Andy Grove
> wrote:
> >
> > > I only noticed a question about Comet by chance yesterday because it
Sounds good -- thanks Andy
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 1:38 PM Andy Grove wrote:
> Thanks for the extra info. It will come in handy if there are any questions
> on this, but it seems like more information than is needed for the IP
> clearance form, IMO.
>
> I went ahead and started the lazy consensu
Thanks for the extra info. It will come in handy if there are any questions
on this, but it seems like more information than is needed for the IP
clearance form, IMO.
I went ahead and started the lazy consensus IP clearance vote. If there are
no objections then the vote will pass in 72 hours time.
+1
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 7:16 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
>
> +1 in my opinion
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 9:50 AM Andy Grove wrote:
>
> > I only noticed a question about Comet by chance yesterday because it was
> > posted as a discussion in the core DataFusion repository.
> >
> > Perhaps we should
+1 in my opinion
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 9:50 AM Andy Grove wrote:
> I only noticed a question about Comet by chance yesterday because it was
> posted as a discussion in the core DataFusion repository.
>
> Perhaps we should enable discussions in the Comet repository as well.
>
> Please let me kn
I only noticed a question about Comet by chance yesterday because it was
posted as a discussion in the core DataFusion repository.
Perhaps we should enable discussions in the Comet repository as well.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thanks,
Andy.
+1 (binding).
Thanks Andy
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 5:07 PM Vakaris Baškirov <
vakaris.bashki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 5:10 AM vin jake wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks Andy
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 9:27 PM Andy Grove
> wrote:
> >
> > > T
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 5:07 AM Vakaris Baškirov <
vakaris.bashki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 5:10 AM vin jake wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks Andy
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 9:27 PM Andy Grove
> wrote:
> >
> > > There is a disc
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 5:10 AM vin jake wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks Andy
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 9:27 PM Andy Grove wrote:
>
> > There is a discussion [1] about moving the Ray SQL project [2] from the
> > `datafusion-contrib/ray-sql` GitHub repository into a new
> > `
13 matches
Mail list logo
